A definition of what a monoply is is irrelevant? Hmmm.
www.bing.com, www.google.com, www.search.yahoo.com, www.ask.com - I can freely use any of the these sites (and many more) to search the web, yet only one of them is a monopolist. How does it work again?
When you have this kind of power you can basically break capitalism, profiting from lack of innovation.
So what you are saying is, Google should stop innovating because it stifles innovation? Because that's how they got their "search market share" (what a dumb term, by the way), not by some shady anti-competitive practices.
Slashdot Mirror
This is completely irrelevant.
A definition of what a monoply is is irrelevant? Hmmm. www.bing.com, www.google.com, www.search.yahoo.com, www.ask.com - I can freely use any of the these sites (and many more) to search the web, yet only one of them is a monopolist. How does it work again?
When you have this kind of power you can basically break capitalism, profiting from lack of innovation.
So what you are saying is, Google should stop innovating because it stifles innovation? Because that's how they got their "search market share" (what a dumb term, by the way), not by some shady anti-competitive practices.