Actually this process is the standard process for claiming privilege over data for any reason permited by the courts or rules of evidence (professional privilege - ie legal/medical and similar, and in some cases reasons of national security or contractual obligation) under processes for discovery in civil cases in Australia.
The only thing that the various open source RDBMS systems do not do is scale nicely to supprt large - really large databases - like say 200,000,00 - 300,000,000 tupules (entries for those not versed with DB theory). When the open source DB's like Postgres/MySQL and such do large data-sets and ave the same data recovery features like Oracle, then wwe'll be looking at taking over the world. until then sure a small business with 20,000 entries will run fine on Postgres on MySQL. But finacials for a large company - no.
Thers is what? 300 million citizens in the USA? There is 6 billion people in the world. The USA produces 10 to 25 % of world's food and 25% of world's pollution while being only about 5% of the popullation. Where does all that energy go? Why is there so much waste?
Nanotechnology would basically reduce the manufacturing industry to the same state (economically) as the software industry is at today, that is the whole cost id borne in the R&D and making of the first "instance" of an object. After that you have an army of self replicating workers that conjure the new item out of raw material, so your only cost is that of procuring the material (much like getting cds for the burning farm at a software maker's factory).
Even packaging is reduced to the supply of raw materials.
Thin on what that woudl do to the labor markes and economies. Especially if all you have to do to make something is to steal some nanotech, point them at alump of foo program them to make foo into bar and here you go. You just foo-bared the standard economic model.
The original article states ther is supports Linux... not so say the people at bitboys. I have e-mailed them about this, and the issue of linux supports is "undecided"...
Why should the news outlets let the trusth stand in the way of sensationalism and greater profits that provides?
Actually this process is the standard process for claiming privilege over data for any reason permited by the courts or rules of evidence (professional privilege - ie legal/medical and similar, and in some cases reasons of national security or contractual obligation) under processes for discovery in civil cases in Australia.
after reading the news article I expect that he will be charged with extorion type offences, not with 'SPIMinning". Bu that remains to be seen...
Very good, but _shite_ I did not expect to see this...
The only thing that the various open source RDBMS systems do not do is scale nicely to supprt large - really large databases - like say 200,000,00 - 300,000,000 tupules (entries for those not versed with DB theory). When the open source DB's like Postgres/MySQL and such do large data-sets and ave the same data recovery features like Oracle, then wwe'll be looking at taking over the world. until then sure a small business with 20,000 entries will run fine on Postgres on MySQL. But finacials for a large company - no.
Have fun with yer Data Bases
Yes...
Thers is what? 300 million citizens in the USA? There is 6 billion people in the world. The USA produces 10 to 25 % of world's food and 25% of world's pollution while being only about 5% of the popullation. Where does all that energy go? Why is there so much waste?
Same goes for Europe...
Hmm. interseting idea occured to me...
Nanotechnology would basically reduce the manufacturing industry to the same state (economically) as the software industry is at today, that is the whole cost id borne in the R&D and making of the first "instance" of an object. After that you have an army of self replicating workers that conjure the new item out of raw material, so your only cost is that of procuring the material (much like getting cds for the burning farm at a software maker's factory).
Even packaging is reduced to the supply of raw materials.
Thin on what that woudl do to the labor markes and economies. Especially if all you have to do to make something is to steal some nanotech, point them at alump of foo program them to make foo into bar and here you go. You just foo-bared the standard economic model.
TMC
The original article states ther is supports Linux... not so say the people at bitboys. I have e-mailed them about this, and the issue of linux supports is "undecided"...
So much for the linux support hype....