Slashdot Mirror


User: kraut

kraut's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
810
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 810

  1. Re:makes you wonder what the gov't has been thinki on U.S. Government Encryption Irony · · Score: 1

    because americans have the inalienable right to keep and arm bears ... or something along those lines.

  2. Re:Gutted on Links to Defamatory Sites are Defamatory? · · Score: 1

    Well, you pays your money (or not, in the case of freeserve), you takes your choice:)

    Personally, I prefer to pay my ISP direct; that way I know they are working for me, and not for whatever telco they are getting their revenues from.

    It's a shame they've had to take this action - but AFAIK the guy has won at least one of his lawsuits already, and demon would be foolish not to protect themselves.

  3. Re:What's wrong with Object-Relational DBs? on Ask Slashdot: Pure Object Databases in Linux? · · Score: 1

    The newer offerings of the commercial vendors also offer query facilities using the OQL (Object Query Language) - approximately a superset of SQL, I believe. There are relevant standards for OQL and various language bindings

    http://www.odmg.org/ would be the place to look

  4. Unnecessary and pointless on UN wants to stop "cybersquatting" · · Score: 1

    What's the point? If you own a trademark that's important enough to be on the list, you already have the legal resources to defend / reclaim your domain name.

    So the net benefit of this proposal is what, exactly?

  5. Possible motives, possible solutions on The Public & The Internet: Open Forum · · Score: 1

    Interesting stuff in here, some of which I agree with. And some which I disagree with:

    For one, I believe gun control is useful - but then I'm not American :)

    Secondly, the death penalty doesn't work, has never worked, and will never work.



    Especially not against people who are planning to kill themselves at the end of their crime spree anyway.



    Also, do you really think that people think about the consequences of their actions? If so, would there be so many murders, so much drunk driving etc?

  6. The Internet has nothing to do with this! on The Public & The Internet: Open Forum · · Score: 1

    True, guns don't kill people, people kill people.

    With guns, usually.

  7. It *IS* the Media! on The Public & The Internet: Open Forum · · Score: 1

    Well, I agree to a degree: There is much more violence in the media than there used to be, and I am not sure that this is a good thing.
    I never did understand why people seem so keen to censor sex in the media while allowing graphic brutality - but that's a different matter. Anyway, I'm not in favour of censorship for adults, but we should certainly keep some of the violence away from kids.

    I also agree with you on the propaganda issues; what I disagree with is the gun issue:
    Regardless of how f**cked up a youngster is, without a gun it will be difficult to start shooting people. Simple as that. Without easy access to guns, this would not have happened.

  8. Where did they get the guns?? on The Public & The Internet: Open Forum · · Score: 1

    Did guns protect your freedom of expression under McCarthy?

    Thought not.

    Britain - where I live now - has been a democracy for a lot longer than the US has existed. And guess what - very very few people have access to guns. Firearms are neither sufficient nor necessary for protecting democracy.

    Funnily enough, we don't have many random shootings in Britain either. Could there be a cause / effect relationship here?
    Oh, and by the way, the Nazis were elected into power; it seems highly unlikely that having guns would have prevented anything.

  9. strcmp on Review:The Practice of Programming · · Score: 1

    strcmp is also a standard C function... compare_string is not.

    Knowing the language doesn't stop at the syntax - you should also make use of the standard libraries, rather than rewriting the same tools all the time.

  10. Linux needs no such thing on Impact of Windows Programmer Hordes on Linux? · · Score: 1

    Horses for courses.

    Yes, large systems are difficult to write - whatever the language. But not all systems are large systems. And for small, fast, throwaway projects, VB is not that bad. It also makes a good prototyping tool - as, I'm sure, do lots of other tools.

    I agree on the problems of the RAD concept though - to a degree. Sometimes quick and dirty is the right approach; sometimes careful design is. It depends on the application and the requirements.