Yeah I've used this as an opportunity for free therapy with a stranger. Be inventive. Cry, practice being Schizophrenic or even just repeat everything they say but sarcastically:) Loads of free fun to be had here.
Interesting points. I always thought the 5th was more aimed at protecting someone from a crime or evidence of a crime they committed while witnessing another. So if I witness a murder while driving a stolen car, the Question "Where did you get the car?" is not relevant to the murder case, but if you admit it you open yourself up to an investigation tangential to the real line of questioning. Might not be the best example but there are others, like witnessing a murder while buying drugs. What were you doing there, should not be part of the testimony of the murder trial. My two cents.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah I've used this as an opportunity for free therapy with a stranger. Be inventive. Cry, practice being Schizophrenic or even just repeat everything they say but sarcastically :) Loads of free fun to be had here.
If a government agency violates the law and demands that you allow them to, it is not treason to hold them accountable. We shall see this play out.
Interesting points. I always thought the 5th was more aimed at protecting someone from a crime or evidence of a crime they committed while witnessing another. So if I witness a murder while driving a stolen car, the Question "Where did you get the car?" is not relevant to the murder case, but if you admit it you open yourself up to an investigation tangential to the real line of questioning. Might not be the best example but there are others, like witnessing a murder while buying drugs. What were you doing there, should not be part of the testimony of the murder trial. My two cents.
Anonymous please step in here. This is BS, we needyour help.