I agree about the OA-only review stance. However, isn't the idea of a curated journal still better than independently-posted articles of questionable quality? At least, how do I find such articles when looking for related work, or how do I know a given article is reputable? I suppose if it's been reviewed by reputable reviewers, but I'm still a little sceptical of the infrastructure (or lack of it).
Having said that, I'm also for “breaking the system” – just not sure how to go about it yet...
Slashdot Mirror
I agree about the OA-only review stance. However, isn't the idea of a curated journal still better than independently-posted articles of questionable quality? At least, how do I find such articles when looking for related work, or how do I know a given article is reputable? I suppose if it's been reviewed by reputable reviewers, but I'm still a little sceptical of the infrastructure (or lack of it). Having said that, I'm also for “breaking the system” – just not sure how to go about it yet...