hehehehehhe, ever mounted swap across a network? or to a tape drive? *thats* style. Or maybe a tad excessive. Oh well... You have to be a tad crazy to be a true hacker...
I personally think that Slackwares Menu based install is almost as beautiful as my gf. Its easy to use, straight forward, not to mention simple. It doesn't assume jack about you or your system, and doesn't fight you when you try to do things that are off the beaten path like *cough*redhat*cough.
Heheheh, screw 80mb! I have gotten Slackware + X + networking in 40mb of space (and *still* have free space). With 20MB of swap it ran fairly slow on a 386SX-25 laptop w/ 3.5mb of ram and a 60mb hdd... heheheheh Smallest install of RedHat was about 50MB in 5.1, without X or networking...
No, what they are saying is that you resolder a few traces *and* replace the memory chip with a larger capacity one. *Not* an easy thing to do when you have heat sensitive chips right next to it.
Slashdot Mirror
hehehehehhe, ever mounted swap across a network? or to a tape drive? *thats* style. Or maybe a tad excessive. Oh well... You have to be a tad crazy to be a true hacker...
-DGhost
I personally think that Slackwares Menu based install is almost as beautiful as my gf. Its easy to use, straight forward, not to mention simple. It doesn't assume jack about you or your system, and doesn't fight you when you try to do things that are off the beaten path like *cough*redhat*cough.
-DGhost
Heheheh, screw 80mb!
I have gotten Slackware + X + networking in 40mb of space (and *still* have free space). With 20MB of swap it ran fairly slow on a 386SX-25 laptop w/ 3.5mb of ram and a 60mb hdd... heheheheh
Smallest install of RedHat was about 50MB in 5.1, without X or networking...
-DGhost
No, what they are saying is that you resolder a few traces *and* replace the memory chip with a larger capacity one. *Not* an easy thing to do when you have heat sensitive chips right next to it.