Slashdot Mirror


User: Squeeze+Truck

Squeeze+Truck's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,086
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,086

  1. Yes, I think so. on European OSS Advantage? · · Score: 1

    Countries worried about US technical dominance, and that have no real operating system industry to speak of have nothing to lose and everything to gain from OSS.

    Also, anyone who might have a potential run-in with the US government (in theory, that could be anyone) should be leary of accepting closed-source programs from the US, especially after that Iraq-printer trojan thing.

    I expect in the near future the edge belongs to Europe, but beyond that I'd say India and China.


    --

  2. Why, yes! on Russian E2k CPU at 135 SPECint95 / 350 SPECfp95 ??? · · Score: 1

    RISC chips have traditionally larger caches to be able to cope with the larger number of instructions. Newer Alphas have 4+ meg of L2 cache.


    --

  3. The Ming Micro! on Russian E2k CPU at 135 SPECint95 / 350 SPECfp95 ??? · · Score: 1

    "Pentium" is just a marketing name.


    --

  4. Russia, who knew? on Russian E2k CPU at 135 SPECint95 / 350 SPECfp95 ??? · · Score: 1

    I was unaware of any computer hardware coming from Russia.


    --

  5. Where? on Ask Slashdot: How Powerful is Your Computer? · · Score: 1

    www.dcginc.com

    It's only an SX, and they told me I got one of only 2 remaining. They have LX's and up as well, but for a little more money.


    --

  6. I bought an Alpha 533 this morning. on Ask Slashdot: How Powerful is Your Computer? · · Score: 1

    Not delivered yet, but I only paid $475 for it (Mobo and chip, both new).

    I hope I can find memory for the bastard.


    --

  7. "Shallow bugs" on The Economist notes Linux and Open Source · · Score: 1

    Isn't this quote attributed to Linus?
    'Course how can I expect the Economist to know that...


    --

  8. Somehow, I don't anticipate a backlash. on The Economist notes Linux and Open Source · · Score: 1

    MS is doomed, and the Economist acknowledges this. Most pieces I've seen lately emphasize the economic benefit of using the software, not the economic peril to proprietary software producers. A suprisingly mature reaction, especially considering similar situations (ie, mp3 and the RIAA) that are being handled so badly.


    --

  9. Very clueful. on The Economist notes Linux and Open Source · · Score: 1

    Articles this well researched are rare.


    --

  10. The POINT of Slashdot? on Excerpt:Running to the Mountain · · Score: 1

    The point of Slashdot is whatever Rob wants the point to be, wether it's Katz, Star Wars, or the world spinning record. NOT what you think should be posted here. It's his site.

    Know who invited Katz to stay? Rob.

    Oh, and the rest of us too. We put it to a vote, remember?


    --

  11. Quickies aren't fluff? on Excerpt:Running to the Mountain · · Score: 1

    Or polls, or star wars, or t.o?


    --

  12. How about some OctobrX bashing? on Excerpt:Running to the Mountain · · Score: 1

    HE DOESN'T WRITE CODE!! HE JUST DRAWS PICTURES!

    NOT ONE OF US!!!

    Please people. Does everyone have to be a coder to help the movement?


    --

  13. Tux with nipples! on Hump Day Quickies · · Score: 1

    Bad Australians! Bad bad bad!!


    --

  14. So much for the universal constant. on Light Traveling at 38 Miles an Hour · · Score: 1

    Any fun time dialation involved?


    --

  15. Multiprocessor Quake! Drool... on QuakeII Coming to BeOS · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but for anything to run on Be, doesn't it have to support the "pervasive multithreading" Be touts?

    If I'm right, and I think I am, that means you could have Quake II running on 8+ processors.

    No lag here.


    --

  16. Psst... Don't look now... on A tiny protest makes a big noise · · Score: 1

    But the Microserfs are here. Can you hear them?

    MS is still on trial.
    They are still trying to convince the DOJ that there is no vendor lock-in, and that there is customer choice. In that regard, this protest was enormously harmful to them.

    If I were MS, and a conniving bastard, I would be in here trying to convince us that the protest harmed Linux more than it helped.

    These people are moles, not trolls.


    --

  17. That's not the point. on A tiny protest makes a big noise · · Score: 1

    Of course you can build your own system. The point was not to go spanging at Microsoft, the trip alone probably cost the protestors about as much as any windows refund.

    The point of any protest is to get attention, provoke a response, and expose your "oppressors" to the world as the amoral hypocrites they really are.

    I built both by systems though. No refund for me.


    --

  18. We lost? on A tiny protest makes a big noise · · Score: 1

    What's the value of crappy unused software compared to prime-time news coverage? This is our biggest win yet.


    --

  19. Well yes, but... on A tiny protest makes a big noise · · Score: 1

    That is how the EULA is worded, but the OEM is not part of the contract. It is a contract between MS and you, the Valued Customer.

    Compaq didn't help draft it, didn't review it, didn't sign it, and probably hadn't seen it. They're just obliged to ship it.

    Honestly, if anyone at Compaq ever saw that clause back in 1995, they probably never thought anything of it.
    Return Windows? In favor of what? OS/2? Linux 1.2.13? CPM? Be serious. :-)


    --

  20. Good Article! on A tiny protest makes a big noise · · Score: 0

    Still with the smart quotes, but social pieces like this is what Katz does best.

    I always wished I were aroung for the protests of the '60s. If someone plans something in Portland or Seattle, could they please post it in advance?


    --

  21. Yes, we should all get over it. on PIII - dead end technology? · · Score: 1

    We should allow the technology-illiterate public to be duped by the Intel marketing machine into believing that the PIII will speed up their internet connections, and that they are the best price-performance chips on the market.

    Pricing based on actual value? Get outa here! Companies should be able to slide by on market share, advertising, and backward-compatibility.

    Whats the point in getting our collective nickers in a twist? Let's all relax, take some soma, and enjoy reruns of Friends! If you haven't seen it 2-3 times already its almost sorta new to you!!!


    --

  22. The Bill on PIII - dead end technology? · · Score: 1

    They wanted to call it the "Bill", but decided it was too obvious. A little whiteout and an exacto-knife, an voila! The "P!!!" !


    --

  23. I have to concur with the first caller. on PIII - dead end technology? · · Score: 1

    This is the pentium processor that fits in the PC that runs the CDROM that enables you to play Monopoly with some dude in Italy.

    Here at intel, trained dancers are busy putting FUN into the processor! Shake it!




    --

  24. Pentium98 on PIII - dead end technology? · · Score: 1

    I was likening it to Windows98. Small benefit, full upgrade price == Pentium 98! Get it? Get it?

    Aw... nevermind.


    --

  25. Eww. on PIII - dead end technology? · · Score: 2

    Intel is turning into as much or more of a marketing company than MS.

    Can you say Pentium98?


    --