AND it's obvious it was written by a pythonazi
while everyone has a favorite language, pythonazi's can't see anywhere beyond theirs. they can't even admit the possibility that there may be a better language than python.
the 'zoo of language' piece would have been better off written with a 'right tool for the right job' theme even if it was written by a member of pythonology.
Re:The book was a dissappointment too.
on
Hannibal's Return
·
· Score: 1
> roundly smashed by the critics and was
> viewed as a great dissappointment.
that's because the book sucked. Hannibal isn't a jack of all trades he is the MASTER of all trades. there wasn't anything he couldn't do in the book.
i assume they took a lot of that out for the movie to keep the audience from laughing...
Slashdot Mirror
AND it's obvious it was written by a pythonazi while everyone has a favorite language, pythonazi's can't see anywhere beyond theirs. they can't even admit the possibility that there may be a better language than python. the 'zoo of language' piece would have been better off written with a 'right tool for the right job' theme even if it was written by a member of pythonology.
> roundly smashed by the critics and was > viewed as a great dissappointment. that's because the book sucked. Hannibal isn't a jack of all trades he is the MASTER of all trades. there wasn't anything he couldn't do in the book. i assume they took a lot of that out for the movie to keep the audience from laughing...