Slashdot Mirror


User: PohlioVirus3

PohlioVirus3's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7

  1. Re:Saboteurs, *not* terrorists. on First (proof-of-concept) .NET virus · · Score: 1

    Forget the terrorist stuff for now. You won that one, OK. :) I used the word pretty loose. Virus-writers are losers. Scum of the earth. It's futile to try and convince me otherwise. I'm offended by any argument defending such cruel actions by such filth, so I refuse to dignify a response to this post by reading it. But go ahead if it makes you feel good.

    AP

  2. Re:Saboteurs, *not* terrorists. on First (proof-of-concept) .NET virus · · Score: 1

    Lousy word, so what? You sound like a lawyer. Yuck. Bottom line: Virus-writers are truly horrible people that don't deserve to use technology.

    AP

  3. Re:The virus. on First (proof-of-concept) .NET virus · · Score: 1

    You're right. I'm sick of hearing the word too. :)

    AP

  4. Re:The virus. on First (proof-of-concept) .NET virus · · Score: 1, Troll

    > Well, this virus really does not do anything interesting.

    They are *never* interesting. When I get the flu and feel miserable for a week, I don't think that's very "intersting". Virus writers are terrorists. They may not kill people, but peoples' lives have been seriously damaged by them. I think of the simple newspaper reporter who gets a virus just before an important deadline. The newspaper publishes a day later than the rival paper, and the reporter gets fired. Extreme example, but stuff like that happens.

    AP

  5. Who are these people? on Fight Virus With Virus? · · Score: 1

    I've been using computers for 15 years now, for fun, for work, etc. I have never understood why viruses are created. Maybe people hate microsoft, so maybe they write a virus to exploit windows computers. I don't know. Do any of you slashdot people know virus-writers personally? I would really love to know what their motivations are. I know several people, good people, whose lives have been devastated by a computer virus, and I think it's quite unfair.

  6. Re:Why a neural network? on Neural Networks In The Home? · · Score: 1

    Obviously no clue. I'll try to help. Neural networks are more properly known as artificial neural networks, and are a topic in the field of artificial intelligence. ANNs are sort of a theoretical model for a statistical process of learning sets of outputs for sets of inputs.

  7. Re:Okay - sounds good to me... on Neural Networks In The Home? · · Score: 1

    Expert systems are out of fashion. Too logistically expensive. They haven't been taught at my school for 5 years. Better are stochastic solutions.