That would be redundant. It already says the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This includes hyper-velocity railguns, AK47s, and muzzle loaders. Of course, it's not very practical to own a railgun now is it. I reckon they're a bit expensive.
Instead of trying to come up with a new way to to secure personal property against undue search and seizure, why don't we start respecting the Constitution.
Now someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think there was something in the Bill of Rights about this...
The 4th Amendment perhaps?
He's also trying to get John Ashcroft, who (I've heard) is an opponent of the UN based on the soveiregnty issue that come with that, into the position of Attorney General.
I have the same feelings about government, and I'm aware of the place the Bush family has in the scheme of 1 world government by the UN. I must admit the nomination of someone to Attorney General who believes the one worlders are a threat shakes things up a little. Either the theory is bunk, or GW is his (gasp) his own man and actually believes in the Constitution.
At any rate, I'd have to know more about Ashcroft and his opinions on the UN to make a decision about him and Bush, but as it stands now I think things are looking up for the freedom-inclined.
Slashdot Mirror
That would be redundant. It already says the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This includes hyper-velocity railguns, AK47s, and muzzle loaders. Of course, it's not very practical to own a railgun now is it. I reckon they're a bit expensive.
Instead of trying to come up with a new way to to secure personal property against undue search and seizure, why don't we start respecting the Constitution. Now someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think there was something in the Bill of Rights about this... The 4th Amendment perhaps?
He's also trying to get John Ashcroft, who (I've heard) is an opponent of the UN based on the soveiregnty issue that come with that, into the position of Attorney General.
I have the same feelings about government, and I'm aware of the place the Bush family has in the scheme of 1 world government by the UN. I must admit the nomination of someone to Attorney General who believes the one worlders are a threat shakes things up a little. Either the theory is bunk, or GW is his (gasp) his own man and actually believes in the Constitution.
At any rate, I'd have to know more about Ashcroft and his opinions on the UN to make a decision about him and Bush, but as it stands now I think things are looking up for the freedom-inclined.
He fears the free exchange of ideas, and seeks a way to squelch that which endangers his survival.
Salon.com is the online equivalent of the NY Times. Both are socialist rags.