Not IRCOPS, but channel ops. I agree with you totally, except I would not stoop to a DDoS to pay them back, nor do I want to be chanel op. I just hink we nees responsible channel ops, and not some over hyped, prebubesent demi-god.
Read the article on "WIRED NEWS."
Would not suprise me at all if the DDoS wasn't started because some arrogant channel op kickbanned someone.
While I can sympathize will Undernet and, indeed all IRC networks, I feel at least half of the blame lies with the arrogant channel operators who are on meglomaniac ego trips, acting like little demi-gods who feel and, in fact, do anything to anyone whenever they feel like it, with no explaination or recourse (except possibly a DDoS against the whole network)from the person they did it to. Maybe what is needed is responsible channel ops.
Slashdot Mirror
I find your reply to be offsenive, in poor taste, and totally lacking in any constructive way.
Not IRCOPS, but channel ops. I agree with you totally, except I would not stoop to a DDoS to pay them back, nor do I want to be chanel op. I just hink we nees responsible channel ops, and not some over hyped, prebubesent demi-god. Read the article on "WIRED NEWS." Would not suprise me at all if the DDoS wasn't started because some arrogant channel op kickbanned someone.
Read the atricle on "WIRED NEWS."
While I can sympathize will Undernet and, indeed all IRC networks, I feel at least half of the blame lies with the arrogant channel operators who are on meglomaniac ego trips, acting like little demi-gods who feel and, in fact, do anything to anyone whenever they feel like it, with no explaination or recourse (except possibly a DDoS against the whole network)from the person they did it to. Maybe what is needed is responsible channel ops.