I just bought my Sim a large flatscreen TV to hang on the wall. I don't think he's set it up properly though, because it looks like it's just stretching out the picture to fit the wider screen.
Can anyone else's Sim advise him on what to do? I think he's depressed about it because he's talking to a large, pink bunny.
If the kid says that video games made him kill, it's approximately as believable as when David Berkowitz says the demons in dogs said he should kill.
When did we start taking the opinions of killers as sane evidence?
Re:String theory is "religion" for scientists
on
The Fabric of the Cosmos
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
What's 1+1? Have you ever seen a 1? Then how do you know two 1s make a 2?
What's a zero? What's the very concept of nothing? Have you ever seen nothing? Then how do you know it exists?
I'm sure the scientists both in favor of and against String theory would have a few choice bits of evidence to offer up in support of their theory.
Instead of reciting the scientific method like a third-grade science teacher to a class, why not offer something more substantial, and, dare I say, SCIENTIFIC to support your hypothesis?
Slashdot Mirror
I just bought my Sim a large flatscreen TV to hang on the wall. I don't think he's set it up properly though, because it looks like it's just stretching out the picture to fit the wider screen.
Can anyone else's Sim advise him on what to do? I think he's depressed about it because he's talking to a large, pink bunny.
This sounds ripe for a "Conan O'Brien" "If they made it" sketch, complete with pictures of hideous Adobe GoWeaver pictures.
If the kid says that video games made him kill, it's approximately as believable as when David Berkowitz says the demons in dogs said he should kill.
When did we start taking the opinions of killers as sane evidence?
What's 1+1? Have you ever seen a 1? Then how do you know two 1s make a 2?
What's a zero? What's the very concept of nothing? Have you ever seen nothing? Then how do you know it exists?
I'm sure the scientists both in favor of and against String theory would have a few choice bits of evidence to offer up in support of their theory.
Instead of reciting the scientific method like a third-grade science teacher to a class, why not offer something more substantial, and, dare I say, SCIENTIFIC to support your hypothesis?