Ideally, the two should align; unfortunately not everything works that way, even when there is a general consensus on what's 'right' and 'wrong'(in the US, not as easy as it sounds). In this case, whatever makes them money is 'right' to the **AA's.
correction- there's plenty of others out there that will work well, but they tend to be in the 2 grand range... paying 2-3 times the price of this nano-pc seems a bit much to me.
There's three wearable displays out there that I saw- Sony Glasstron ($499), Display Systems I-glasses lc ($499), and Olympus Eye-Trek W150($799). Unfortunately, they apparently don't have the resolution of a computer monitor- think old projection screen TV. Having experimented with big-screen TVs as displays, I wouldn't suggest it.
Sig? who needs a sig?
You would think so, but a quick check of Apple's website about OSX apps says otherwise. Check it out, if you're skeptical.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/applications/index.htm l
-says a mac user looking hard at linux
Slashdot Mirror
Ideally, the two should align; unfortunately not everything works that way, even when there is a general consensus on what's 'right' and 'wrong'(in the US, not as easy as it sounds). In this case, whatever makes them money is 'right' to the **AA's.
correction- there's plenty of others out there that will work well, but they tend to be in the 2 grand range... paying 2-3 times the price of this nano-pc seems a bit much to me.
There's three wearable displays out there that I saw- Sony Glasstron ($499), Display Systems I-glasses lc ($499), and Olympus Eye-Trek W150($799). Unfortunately, they apparently don't have the resolution of a computer monitor- think old projection screen TV. Having experimented with big-screen TVs as displays, I wouldn't suggest it. Sig? who needs a sig?
You would think so, but a quick check of Apple's website about OSX apps says otherwise. Check it out, if you're skeptical. http://www.apple.com/macosx/applications/index.htm l
-says a mac user looking hard at linux