And you'll be violating the providers' rights. Deal with it.
Consumers are getting their fair use rights violated by the providers. Who's rights are worth more?
like "copyright"? That little thing that lets the BSD license have any legal force?
Copyright cannot stop you from making duplicate copies of a copyrighter work so long as it falls under fair use. Time Shifting for as long as I have known is fair use. There really is no comparison to the original poster's BSD work.
It's their bundle of rights to hand out as they wish, and if they don't want you, in particular, to record or even receive such material, that's your problem. It's simple, really; comply with the provider's terms, or just don't use the material.
The flaw in this statement is that broadcasters transmit radio waves onto your property regardless of you accepting terms of a license or not. Those waves once entering your property become your property. Much like receiving an unsolicited CD from AOL. You can extract the broadcast from the signal if you wish and do whatever you like with it so long as it complies with fair use.
There is one fatal flaw in your assessment of freedom of speech. Companies are not individuals, they do nor should not have the rights of an individual. They are powerful enough as is.
Slander only applies if what he was saying was:
(a) Unfactual - Since he was relating his personal experience I doupt that was the case
(b) Deiberately used to hurt the company - This was not the case as he apears to be posting his opinion to counter the opinions of others.
The problem is that unless the character and items are completely new, they are considered derived works. You cannot sell characters based on Sony's models. It's the same reason you cannot take a book, copy it adding an new introduction and then sell it for your own profit. Unless the group made the characters from the ground up, I see little defense to this. There is a difference between PhotoShop and Sega Dreamcast. The Dreamcast save-game is indirectly made by the game itself, whereas Photoshop files are directly representational of the artist work. Two very different things.
However I don't think the issue here is copyright, though it could be. It's a contract law, which the gamers supposable agreed to before joining the service Sony provides. They have every right to kick someone they don't like off their service, so long as they refund their payment not used.
There is something in copywrite law known as derivitive work. Since the character is derived from a copywrited work (the game) they are well in thier right to do as they chose.
My favorite teacher in life was not employed by any board of education. He was my father. He taught me the value of money early in my life by helping me find a job. He taught me integrity and how to laugh even in the darkest situations. When his job was cut by a multinational corperation he started his own business. He taught me the power of forgivness when he became the top distributer for the company he was cut from for 3 years in a row. He taught me about perserverance when he helped take a business of 3 people into a corperation with 3 businesses. To whomever mesures money as a form of sucess my father is a millionare now. But probably one of the most important lessons my father taught me is that money is no substitute for family.
Slashdot Mirror
And you'll be violating the providers' rights. Deal with it.
Consumers are getting their fair use rights violated by the providers. Who's rights are worth more?
like "copyright"? That little thing that lets the BSD license have any legal force?
Copyright cannot stop you from making duplicate copies of a copyrighter work so long as it falls under fair use. Time Shifting for as long as I have known is fair use. There really is no comparison to the original poster's BSD work.
It's their bundle of rights to hand out as they wish, and if they don't want you, in particular, to record or even receive such material, that's your problem. It's simple, really; comply with the provider's terms, or just don't use the material.
The flaw in this statement is that broadcasters transmit radio waves onto your property regardless of you accepting terms of a license or not. Those waves once entering your property become your property. Much like receiving an unsolicited CD from AOL. You can extract the broadcast from the signal if you wish and do whatever you like with it so long as it complies with fair use.
There is one fatal flaw in your assessment of freedom of speech. Companies are not individuals, they do nor should not have the rights of an individual. They are powerful enough as is.
Slander only applies if what he was saying was:
(a) Unfactual - Since he was relating his personal experience I doupt that was the case
(b) Deiberately used to hurt the company - This was not the case as he apears to be posting his opinion to counter the opinions of others.
And we all know how acurate website counters are.
"Scot Hacker is a stockholder in Be, Inc. "
Woah no bias in that article
The problem is that unless the character and items are completely new, they are considered derived works. You cannot sell characters based on Sony's models. It's the same reason you cannot take a book, copy it adding an new introduction and then sell it for your own profit. Unless the group made the characters from the ground up, I see little defense to this. There is a difference between PhotoShop and Sega Dreamcast. The Dreamcast save-game is indirectly made by the game itself, whereas Photoshop files are directly representational of the artist work. Two very different things.
However I don't think the issue here is copyright, though it could be. It's a contract law, which the gamers supposable agreed to before joining the service Sony provides. They have every right to kick someone they don't like off their service, so long as they refund their payment not used.
There is something in copywrite law known as derivitive work. Since the character is derived from a copywrited work (the game) they are well in thier right to do as they chose.
My favorite teacher in life was not employed by any board of education. He was my father. He taught me the value of money early in my life by helping me find a job. He taught me integrity and how to laugh even in the darkest situations. When his job was cut by a multinational corperation he started his own business. He taught me the power of forgivness when he became the top distributer for the company he was cut from for 3 years in a row. He taught me about perserverance when he helped take a business of 3 people into a corperation with 3 businesses. To whomever mesures money as a form of sucess my father is a millionare now. But probably one of the most important lessons my father taught me is that money is no substitute for family.