Even if it is different (I did not see any mention
on the gPulp site of an intent to make the
location protocol compliant with 'SLP'), I fail
to see why the need to invent another protocol
that I believe fulfills the same need of the
existing one.
How about if slashdot postings are mux-ed to a usenet newsgroup (comp.tech.slashdot / alt.slashdot /... ) ?
It would give instantly more visibility and distribution.
Optionally, how about a slashdot enhancement that allows the posting (or the thread) to be routed to Usenet as well ? (a check button on the 'Post Comment' dialog).
What many seem not to have noticed is that the withdrawal from the ECMA standardization effort is accompanied with the royalty-free release of the Java 2 standard edition.
In my view (and I am not speaking for my employer) this should assuage the developer's fears of not having the standards body oversee the process.
No better way to detract from the interest that Microsoft may have generated than to divert back the efforts of the linux community to a more worthy cause - improving the security of our own systems.
If not a friend, how would one qualify being a member of Linux International - certainly before SGI or HP.
What about the help given to do the JDK 1.2 port to Linux ?
What about the hardware lent to the linux sparc port ?
The reason why HP (don't know about SGI) offer Linux courses is because they want to sell their Intel boxes, certainly not for their PA-RISC, MIPS processors. In that context, Sun sells no Intel-based hardware. That is my explanation why linux instruction is not offered by Sun.
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.engineergirl.org/nae/cwe/egmain.nsf/(we blinks)/ESER-5JBKQD?opendocument
This URL indicates that the Royal Gorge bridge,
outside Canon City, Colorado, USA is
higher than the one mentioned
>Why don't you learn proper English grammer and spelling before posting, eh moron?
Before jumping on others look at yourself.
s/grammar/grammer/
about this, is - in the context of the location
protocol -,
'How is this different than the proposed
IETF Service Location Protocol ?'
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/svrloc-charte
Even if it is different (I did not see any mention
on the gPulp site of an intent to make the
location protocol compliant with 'SLP'), I fail
to see why the need to invent another protocol
that I believe fulfills the same need of the
existing one.
Arieh
I actually like the idea (of posting to Usenet).
... ) ?
How about if slashdot postings are mux-ed to
a usenet newsgroup (comp.tech.slashdot /
alt.slashdot /
It would give instantly more visibility and
distribution.
Optionally, how about a slashdot enhancement
that allows the posting (or the thread) to be
routed to Usenet as well ? (a check button on
the 'Post Comment' dialog).
Arieh
I did not see that IE was releasing the source.
In my view (and I am not speaking for my employer) this should assuage the developer's fears of not having the standards body oversee the process.
This URL has more information.
Kudos to the PPC guys.
No better way to detract from the interest that
Microsoft may have generated than to divert back the efforts of the linux community to a more
worthy cause - improving the security of our own systems.
Let's eat our own (dog)food.
Arieh
I wonder whether steganography (hiding the messages inside of other data) would be in violation of the proposed limitations.
Arieh
If not a friend, how would one qualify being a member of Linux International - certainly before SGI or HP.
What about the help given to do the JDK 1.2 port to Linux ?
What about the hardware lent to the linux sparc port ?
The reason why HP (don't know about SGI) offer Linux courses is because they want to sell their Intel boxes, certainly not for their PA-RISC, MIPS processors. In that context, Sun sells no Intel-based hardware. That is my explanation why linux instruction is not offered by Sun.
My conclusion: yes a friend and an ally.
--
I work for Sun. But my opinions are mine.