I think that templates are fixed, I know that MFC are finished, design wise, the only updates will be bug fixes.
They plan something new, which will be fully template based, which mean that they either have to go OS or fix the compiler.
Guess what will they do?
Non seem very active at the moment, though.
However, the entire C# specification can be downloaded (for free) from MS' site, so it can't be *too* hard to do it.
The main problem, I think, is that C# doesn't really have a library system, such as C++, it has all the.NET for this, so you have to implement.NET, which is not fully done, let alone published, yet.
Speaking about platform independent, both MS and OSS are supposed to be working on porting.NET (and hence C#) to other OS.
If they want to get EMCA approved standards, they *have* to do it on at least two platforms.
And here is one link to OSS CLI &.NET, which will gives you C# as well.
Office XP has speech recognition.
But I disagree with you strongly about giving developers the Mhz, *test* it on a 120Mhz, and then force the developer to use it for a couple of hours, you are certain to have someone eager to efficinate code.
But to try to develop on too few Mhz is a pain.
Of course, 333Mhz is good enough, but I just came out of a 120Mhz + 32MB, running win98 & VC6, I'll have nightmares about it for years, I think.
Tech Support: Hello, may I help you?
Customer: Yes, I have a problem with my P4 system, there is smoke coming out of it, and it won't boot.
TS: Did you use the Intel Grill(R) option?
C: Yes, that is why I bought it.
TS: Your CPU is stained with fat, clean it up, and it will work.
We classify protocols by their heading (http://, ftp://, news://, not by their domain.
What do you make of this?
http://joe@user.com.email ?
http://news.myisp.com.news ?
I'm not saying that it's a bad idea, only that it would be *much* better served if you created a plug-in/stand alone program that allows you to do it.
I'm not sure how you go around registering protocols handler for linux, but in Windows, you can do it quite easier, witness napster://, frex.
You can download any of the free compotents to do it for you, get online and do a little search on how to do it yourself.
Here is one of many:
http://www.asp101.com/articles/jacob/scriptuploa d. asp
And what about CDONTS? Or any of the many other components to send emails via ASP?
And *please*, remember, ASP is a *frame work* it's not a language.
You can write ASP code in any language that you desire.
I don't like the way he did it.
.free domains? Why on earth would I want that?
Why not just:
freenet:// ?
Since both IE & Mozilla support protocols extentions, he should've no problems with it.
Then you write a plugin that handles it, and that is *it*.
Are you insane?
Netscape is by no means a good example of commercial software.
It got to the point when/netscape.com/ looked better in non-Netscape browser!
For a long time, MS was the one that provided an Oracle ODBC driver, because Oracle wouldn't provide one.
Oracle doesn't *care* about PHP integration. If you buy oracle, you won't be worrying that connecting to it with PHP will take few extra minutes (hours?) to set it up.
Win ME has advocates?
Exactly where?
I don't think that I've ever heard about 9x advocates. I know that some people had good experiance with them, but not enough to *advocate* them.
Win95 shipped with IE 2.0, IE1.0 was a sad joke.
IE3.0 was already usable, but no match to NS3.
IE 4.0 was when it became the better browser.
And by Q3 this year, MS is going to release IE6.0
As a note, IE crashing (quite rare, I might add) usually don't take down the shell. If they do, what happens is that you have to wait a second, and everything returns to normal, the only bad side affect is that usually, the icons in the notification area (near the watch) are gone.
What happens on linux when the WM crashes?
I'm running Whistler Advance Server on a P3 500 with 384MB, no problems whatsoever.
Another machine run whistler pro on Celeron 450 with 80MB, noticebly slower.
If you've enough memory (128MB, which is *cheap* today) the CPU doesn't really matter.
And 700Mhz isn't that old.
Slashdot Mirror
I think that templates are fixed, I know that MFC are finished, design wise, the only updates will be bug fixes.
They plan something new, which will be fully template based, which mean that they either have to go OS or fix the compiler.
Guess what will they do?
Here are a couple more:
.NET for this, so you have to implement .NET, which is not fully done, let alone published, yet.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ocsdnet/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencsharp/
Non seem very active at the moment, though.
However, the entire C# specification can be downloaded (for free) from MS' site, so it can't be *too* hard to do it.
The main problem, I think, is that C# doesn't really have a library system, such as C++, it has all the
Speaking about platform independent, both MS and OSS are supposed to be working on porting .NET (and hence C#) to other OS.
.NET, which will gives you C# as well.
If they want to get EMCA approved standards, they *have* to do it on at least two platforms.
And here is one link to OSS CLI &
http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-net/
C# was submitted to EMCA, it's going through the standards as you read it.
C# doesn't require a virtual machine, it should be compiled to IL, which is then compiled to native binary.
I'm sure there are others, but SmartFTP is sciptable.
Office XP has speech recognition.
But I disagree with you strongly about giving developers the Mhz, *test* it on a 120Mhz, and then force the developer to use it for a couple of hours, you are certain to have someone eager to efficinate code.
But to try to develop on too few Mhz is a pain.
Of course, 333Mhz is good enough, but I just came out of a 120Mhz + 32MB, running win98 & VC6, I'll have nightmares about it for years, I think.
Tech Support: Hello, may I help you?
Customer: Yes, I have a problem with my P4 system, there is smoke coming out of it, and it won't boot.
TS: Did you use the Intel Grill(R) option?
C: Yes, that is why I bought it.
TS: Your CPU is stained with fat, clean it up, and it will work.
Nevertheless, it's not good design desicion.
We classify protocols by their heading (http://, ftp://, news://, not by their domain.
What do you make of this?
http://joe@user.com.email ?
http://news.myisp.com.news ?
I'm not saying that it's a bad idea, only that it would be *much* better served if you created a plug-in/stand alone program that allows you to do it.
I'm not sure how you go around registering protocols handler for linux, but in Windows, you can do it quite easier, witness napster://, frex.
Well, since you asked for it... here are couple of links.
, 12 249,2646052,00.html
s ht ml
1 a. html?tw=programming
http://www.zdnet.com/enterprise/stories/linux/0
http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/030200-1.
This I *highly* recommend:
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/99/46/index
You can download any of the free compotents to do it for you, get online and do a little search on how to do it yourself.a d. asp
Here is one of many:
http://www.asp101.com/articles/jacob/scriptuplo
And what about CDONTS? Or any of the many other components to send emails via ASP?
And *please*, remember, ASP is a *frame work* it's not a language.
You can write ASP code in any language that you desire.
On NT, PHP can be used as CGI, or ISAPI, which is the more common case.
I don't like the way he did it.
.free domains? Why on earth would I want that?
Why not just:
freenet:// ?
Since both IE & Mozilla support protocols extentions, he should've no problems with it.
Then you write a plugin that handles it, and that is *it*.
Are you insane? /netscape.com/ looked better in non-Netscape browser!
Netscape is by no means a good example of commercial software.
It got to the point when
Sure, when those Sun will cost like a 286 today.
For a long time, MS was the one that provided an Oracle ODBC driver, because Oracle wouldn't provide one.
Oracle doesn't *care* about PHP integration. If you buy oracle, you won't be worrying that connecting to it with PHP will take few extra minutes (hours?) to set it up.
Did they ever seriously tried?
Win ME has advocates?
Exactly where?
I don't think that I've ever heard about 9x advocates. I know that some people had good experiance with them, but not enough to *advocate* them.
Imagine MS doing the same?
There wouldn't be a single non-MS APP that you could run on Windows legally.
At first they came for... doesn't ring a bell?
In a country with no civil rights, it's not such a big deal to make sure that drug use is very close to zero.
There is no *reason* to buy it.
When what you have is more than enough, what would you buy more?
Win95 shipped with IE 2.0, IE1.0 was a sad joke.
IE3.0 was already usable, but no match to NS3.
IE 4.0 was when it became the better browser.
And by Q3 this year, MS is going to release IE6.0
As a note, IE crashing (quite rare, I might add) usually don't take down the shell. If they do, what happens is that you have to wait a second, and everything returns to normal, the only bad side affect is that usually, the icons in the notification area (near the watch) are gone.
What happens on linux when the WM crashes?
I'm running Whistler Advance Server on a P3 500 with 384MB, no problems whatsoever.
Another machine run whistler pro on Celeron 450 with 80MB, noticebly slower.
If you've enough memory (128MB, which is *cheap* today) the CPU doesn't really matter.
And 700Mhz isn't that old.