I run as user, and I've programs that require file access that can't be (normally) run as User. (Babylon, Getright, SmartFTP, etc)
What I do, is give users access to their directory, and all is well.
Why can't you do the same with Netscape?
Runas command from the CLI.
Shift+Right Click from the GUI
Both let you the equilent of su in windows.
Tip: runas/user:administrator cmd
will open a new shell windows that will let you admin privileges.
I would also suggest you would install Terminal Services, which I find easier to use than runas. (Avoid the confustion, what is my windows, and what are the other user's windows.)
JS/VBS are platform independent, OS-dependent.
Assembler is platform dependent and OS independent.
Assembler is not below compiled code, btw. It is on the same level as compiled code.
And what non-x86 instruction do you think that the virus would use, that make it Intel dependent? I think that it would use x86 instruction set, and thus make AMD, Cyrix, etc... also vulnerable.
It use up all the memory, and you've to kill it, and all the resources it took will be freed.
I like this better, BTW.
void main (void) {while (malloc(0xFFFF)); }
> When the article starts talking about the things that are really important, like stability and speed, the results of their findings are instantly dismissed because it's beta software. Well, um, beta should have a few bugs, granted, but it's not alpha software, where the entire thing crashes at every turn! It should have atleast _some_ stability.
I'm using XP 2296 (when it was called Whistler).
My uptime is 22 days, 18 hours, 44 minutes, 46 seconds.
Since registry is just for data storage, you can change the APIs pretty easily.
/Registry
/HKCU
/HKLM
Etc, with text files for the values.
Shouldn't be a problem to implement.
It's fully customizable.
It takes about 5 minutes to find & customize it to the old look. And unlike what people said, it's just as useful as Win 2K is.
Nice feature in XP (And probably IE6) is the ability to mascarade your IE browser.
It's neccecary, because some stupid websites actually tells you to "go get IE5.5" if you browse to them with IE 6.
Um, not.
ASP is a framework, for which you can write in every language that you want.
Perl, for instance, is one of them.
And IIRC, there are some examples of perl ASP scripts that are installed with IIS.
JScript, VBScript (Don't used this!), Perl, and a lot of other languages can be used to write ASP pages.
Actually, most of the components that you reffers to are usually accessed via COM objects.
It's pretty routine to do the real work in COM objects in ASP, btw.
ASP+ (which became ASP.NET) has made large improvements in adding more COM objects, so now ASP has as wide or wider set of components as PHP.
Yeah, what I can't understand is why Sun isn't pushing for compiled Java in some situations (User land programs, frex.)
How long does it take to make a.class file into a native code, anyway? I would think that upon install, Java programs need to be compiled to native code, so there would be no performance penalty.
Windows 2000 already has this, you can do Open, which default to the file type openner, and open with (right click), which gives you a list of all the programs that you open this file with.
Slashdot Mirror
I run as user, and I've programs that require file access that can't be (normally) run as User. (Babylon, Getright, SmartFTP, etc)
What I do, is give users access to their directory, and all is well.
Why can't you do the same with Netscape?
Runas command from the CLI. /user:administrator cmd
Shift+Right Click from the GUI
Both let you the equilent of su in windows.
Tip: runas
will open a new shell windows that will let you admin privileges.
I would also suggest you would install Terminal Services, which I find easier to use than runas. (Avoid the confustion, what is my windows, and what are the other user's windows.)
JS/VBS are platform independent, OS-dependent.
Assembler is platform dependent and OS independent.
Assembler is not below compiled code, btw. It is on the same level as compiled code.
And what non-x86 instruction do you think that the virus would use, that make it Intel dependent? I think that it would use x86 instruction set, and thus make AMD, Cyrix, etc... also vulnerable.
Good News Unlimited Image Manipulation Program Tool Kit :-> :->
It use up all the memory, and you've to kill it, and all the resources it took will be freed.
I like this better, BTW.
void main (void) {while (malloc(0xFFFF)); }
> When the article starts talking about the things that are really important, like stability and speed, the results of their findings are instantly dismissed because it's beta software. Well, um, beta should have a few bugs, granted, but it's not alpha software, where the entire thing crashes at every turn! It should have atleast _some_ stability.
I'm using XP 2296 (when it was called Whistler).
My uptime is 22 days, 18 hours, 44 minutes, 46 seconds.
Stick CD in the drive, follow instructions...
Done.
About the hardest part is choosing the partition to install on.
2K & XP are extremely similar to each other.
XP is not even NT6.
If it's going to work on XP, it's likely to work on 2K as well.
Um, yes it does.
It's the home version we are talking about, but it's still based on the same kernel as XP Server & XP Advance Server will be.
Press ALT, and you'll see it, you can also change it so you will always see the underlines.
You are talking about services, which you need to kill from the services MMC.
Since registry is just for data storage, you can change the APIs pretty easily.
/HKCU
/HKLM
/Registry
Etc, with text files for the values.
Shouldn't be a problem to implement.
Why would you need 2K emulation? XP *is* 2K, in any way that means something.
It's fully customizable.
It takes about 5 minutes to find & customize it to the old look. And unlike what people said, it's just as useful as Win 2K is.
No, it's text editors (notepad, pico, etc) that makes compact code.
Nice feature in XP (And probably IE6) is the ability to mascarade your IE browser.
It's neccecary, because some stupid websites actually tells you to "go get IE5.5" if you browse to them with IE 6.
Aside from connection speed, you already can get this information.
JS & VBS only for Chillisoft, sorry.
You confuse ASP with VBScript, which is very limited.
And ASP+VBS can do file uploads on its own, the rest it can't, though.
ASP is not very good with sessions, ASP+ is much better handling them.
Um, not.
ASP is a framework, for which you can write in every language that you want.
Perl, for instance, is one of them.
And IIRC, there are some examples of perl ASP scripts that are installed with IIS.
JScript, VBScript (Don't used this!), Perl, and a lot of other languages can be used to write ASP pages.
Actually, most of the components that you reffers to are usually accessed via COM objects.
It's pretty routine to do the real work in COM objects in ASP, btw.
ASP+ (which became ASP.NET) has made large improvements in adding more COM objects, so now ASP has as wide or wider set of components as PHP.
Yeah, what I can't understand is why Sun isn't pushing for compiled Java in some situations (User land programs, frex.) .class file into a native code, anyway? I would think that upon install, Java programs need to be compiled to native code, so there would be no performance penalty.
How long does it take to make a
What market? Server? Java wasn't supposed to be on server on the beginnning.
Windows 2000 already has this, you can do Open, which default to the file type openner, and open with (right click), which gives you a list of all the programs that you open this file with.