Well, sound really great! and even it migh have some drawbacks, but hey, everything must have, especially in the first stage! It will get better, and sound well enough now! Means there is no need for an 'dedicated' admin! hehe, great!:-A
BT's Openworld turned out to be an absolute disaster for about £40 (US$60,cheapest in UK!) + £150 connection fee you would get an abosolutelly disgraced service, with plenty of packet loss (that's what pple would say!) and Cable service turned out a much better alternative with better pings and about the same download speeds (~70kb/s)
for under £25.
KDE 1 ROCKS, it even runs on my 486 machine happily!#
to secret that kde2 is a bloated slow desktop environment, which in no way compares to the first one.
my p2-450mhz/256mb is not even enough for kde2 to run smoothly!!!
SHAME FOR YOU, KDE(2) DEVELOPERS!!!?
I wouldnt call this device computer: it is rather complex electronic device. Everything, including CPU was optimised for its purpose.
Sometimes it is much better to do stuff electronicaly, rather than by the means of software: that simple, software is not reliable enough
Slashdot Mirror
Absolutely! the only reason why to use BSD over LInux is that perl is properly supported and such features like perlcc works
..or free to take the gun out and 'frag' some1..? :-/
..well, that's what you are about to learn when u go to Uni, isnt it?!?
Well, sound really great! and even it migh have some drawbacks, but hey, everything must have, especially in the first stage! It will get better, and sound well enough now! Means there is no need for an 'dedicated' admin! hehe, great! :-A
BT's Openworld turned out to be an absolute disaster for about £40 (US$60,cheapest in UK!) + £150 connection fee you would get an abosolutelly disgraced service, with plenty of packet loss (that's what pple would say!) and Cable service turned out a much better alternative with better pings and about the same download speeds (~70kb/s)
for under £25.
Quake3!? I thought it only ran in Linux,win ans mac!
Maybe you meen quake1?
wicked!! where can i get those?!?!?
KDE 1 ROCKS, it even runs on my 486 machine happily!# to secret that kde2 is a bloated slow desktop environment, which in no way compares to the first one. my p2-450mhz/256mb is not even enough for kde2 to run smoothly!!! SHAME FOR YOU, KDE(2) DEVELOPERS!!!?
I wouldnt call this device computer: it is rather complex electronic device. Everything, including CPU was optimised for its purpose.
Sometimes it is much better to do stuff electronicaly, rather than by the means of software: that simple, software is not reliable enough
exT