Then don't. If you're not happy with a product, buy something else. Buy ATI. Buy Matrox. If I bought a Honda Civic and I wanted to go off road, I'd not complain. I'd sell it and buy a Jeep. End of story.
That's kind of like saying, "I have a Jeep Cherokee and a Corvette. I raced them and the 'Vette surprisingly kicked the shit out of the Jeep. Must be because Chevy's engines are open sourced."
I work for Cisco. I think the reason that they haven't enforced their patents is that they truely are out for the betterment of the industry. But I'm not saying that they're not out to make a dollar. That would be stupid. I would argue that they let stuff like the NAT thing go because it creates competetion in the industry. Which just allows them to show everyone that their product is better, while granted more expensive:)
Never trust a monkey.
Slashdot Mirror
Then don't. If you're not happy with a product, buy something else. Buy ATI. Buy Matrox. If I bought a Honda Civic and I wanted to go off road, I'd not complain. I'd sell it and buy a Jeep. End of story.
That's kind of like saying, "I have a Jeep Cherokee and a Corvette. I raced them and the 'Vette surprisingly kicked the shit out of the Jeep. Must be because Chevy's engines are open sourced."
I work for Cisco. I think the reason that they haven't enforced their patents is that they truely are out for the betterment of the industry. But I'm not saying that they're not out to make a dollar. That would be stupid. I would argue that they let stuff like the NAT thing go because it creates competetion in the industry. Which just allows them to show everyone that their product is better, while granted more expensive :)
Never trust a monkey.