Slashdot Mirror


User: briansmith

briansmith's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
107
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 107

  1. Re:NAT is not a protocol on Choosing a Router/Firewall for the Home LAN · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that. The information I posted is the specification sheet for the router as supplied by D-Link, not anything I compiled myself.

  2. Re:For $51, just get a router! on Choosing a Router/Firewall for the Home LAN · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have heard similar stories. Did you register the product with them? I heard that they will absolutely ignore you until you register, but then they are often very helpful.

  3. For $51, just get a router! on Choosing a Router/Firewall for the Home LAN · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure, you can build one out of an old computer and spare parts. But, think about the physical size, noise of the fans, and electrical consumption. Plus, you could use that old computer for something else. I got a D-Link DI-804 for $51 from Amazon.com this week. $80.00 - $30.00 rebate - $10.00 online coupon + 11.00 S/H. It seems to have all the features you want. It has a simple web interface for basic stuff but it also has a telnet interface for more advanced features. Look at the D-Link site for the product (http://www.dlink.com/products/broadband/di804/).

    Note: The picture on the D-Link and Amazon.com websites is of an older design where the four switch ports are on the front, and the WAN port is on the back. On the one I received yesterday, all ports are on the back (much less messy). I emailed them telling them that the picture didn't look anything like the actual product and so they apparently pulled the webpage for the product temporarily.

    The setup was painless (basically, just plugged it in, attached network cables, renewed my IP leases, and changed the admin password). I even upgraded the firmware in less than a minute. It is also silent (no fan) and it is about the size of the area of a keyboard between the [ESC] and the right-alt key. It is working great.

    It has four ports in the built-in switch. Port one can be used either as a normal switch port or as an uplink. It also has a serial port that you can attach an external modem to share as a backup for then your cable/dsl connect goes out.

    For $51, it is basically the same price as the 486 solution that someone else cited as $45, and it even comes with a one-year warrenty (apparently, D-Link used to have a lifetime warrenty but I guess they don't do that for the consumer stuff any more).

    CPU 32bits ARM RISC CPU
    Memory 512 Kbytes Flash Memory
    4 Mbytes SDRAM
    Standards IEEE 802.3 10Base-T Ethernet
    IEEE 802.3u 100Base-TX Fast Ethernet
    IEEE 802.3x Flow Control
    ANSI/IEEE 802.3 NWay Auto-Negotiation
    Protocols Supported
    TCP/IP
    NAT
    DHCP
    UPD
    PAP
    CHAP
    MSCHAP
    RIP1/RIP2
    PPPoE
    Virtual Server

    VPN Pass Through Function*
    PPTP
    L2TP
    IPSec

    Firewall Protection: Built in NAT firewall using stateful packet inspection

    Management: Web-Based - requires a PC, Mac, or Linux based computer with a Web Browser capable of running Java script.

    Firmware Upgrade: Web-Based - requires a PC, Mac, or Linux based computer with a Web Browser capable of running Java script.

    Ports:
    4 x NWay 10BASE-T/100BASE-TX Fast Ethernet LAN
    Port 1 has Uplink/Normal switch
    1 x 10Base-T WAN
    1 x RS-232 (230 Kbps, male DB-9) - for back-up analog modem connection

    LED's
    Power
    WAN
    Console
    Link/Act. (Link / Activity)
    10/100 Mbps

    Power DC 5V 2A
    Operating Temperature 0 C ~ 40 C
    Storing Temperature -20 C ~ 70 C
    Humidity Max 95% Non-condensing
    EMI Certification FCC part 15 Class B in US

  4. Re:The Better Quest Site on Mozilla Moves Into 2002? Maybe. · · Score: 1

    It is XHTML. You must have an XHTML-capable browser to see it. Apparently IE 5.5 is not XHTML-capable.

  5. Re:If? on Could Eminent Domain Break The RIAA Stranglehold? · · Score: 1

    Have these things been challenged in court? I would guess that they would not stand. I don't know the law very well, but I would think that this is basically a company bribing the government to let it gain land at a discount. I don't see how that following the spirit of eminent domain, but rather is just an abuse of power.

    Could you please post some links to information about these two cases? Thanks!

  6. Re:OS Oracle - it COULD happen on The Open Sourcing of Oracle · · Score: 1

    The rumor is that Oracle's developers are afraid to touch it for fear of breaking something, so all new features are bolted on using PL/SQL packages.) This is not true. There are some serious low-level behind-the-scenes changes coming in Oracle 9i. For example: each tablespace can have its own block size, it will be able to automatically manage file allocation (creating and resizing data files automatically within limits set by the DBA), better manage temporary segments and rollback segments. Like you said, in 8i they integrated Java into the Oracle server, with an almost-completely-new JVM that supports session-oriented "Virtual JVM"'s for efficiency. They didn't do that in PL/SQL. Most JVM vendors can't seem to do that in ANY language. That's just a few. None of that happened with PL/SQL. They haven't changed the core because the core is "mature". They've been working on it for 20 years, after all. If you have a METALINK account then you can look at all the bugs they fix in the the "low-level" C code within days or weeks of having them reported. That makes me doubt that they "fear" anything. And, the fact that they use PL/SQL for MANY features is a tribute to the designers and implementers of PL/SQL at Oracle. In fact, I wish there was a freely-avaialable embedded PL/SQL engine. Finally, Oracle is buddies with Sun and at one point they had an product called Oracle Appliance that ran on a custom tripped-down version of Sun Solaris and the OS and Oracle came pre-installed as a package. That is probably as close to "Oracle OS" as you will get.

  7. Oracle: #1 Shareware Company on The Open Sourcing of Oracle · · Score: 1

    If you sign up at http://otn.oracle.com you can download literally millions of dollars of software from their site. Their software doesn't have any timers or nag screens. You can even get free "Developer" licenses for many of their products. So, for all intents and purposes, Oracle has become a Shareware company, although they don't advertise it. And, in fact, I would say that they are the biggest and the best Shareware company there is. Can anybody think of anybody bigger or better?

    However, Oracle won't let you see bug reports for products that you aren't "supported" for on their support site (http://metalink.oracle.com) which requires a valid support contract even to get onto. So, I doubt they are going to become anything like an "Open Source" company.