Photoshop isn't really professional, its a 'tool', not really a major rendering suite. Compared to some of software Ive seen for doing 3D, photoshop is a cheap ripoff compared to them.
So your comparing a 2d graphics editor to 3d modelling software? I don't get it. What other 2d image editing software do you consider 'professional'? Is it not fair to say in respect to the Gimp, as *it* being a cheap ripoff of Photoshop? Have a look at it's tools for example, everyone of them has been lifted from Photoshop, from the filters to the brush based tools like the magic wand and blur tool.
Slashdot Mirror
Photoshop isn't really professional, its a 'tool', not really a major rendering suite. Compared to some of software Ive seen for doing 3D, photoshop is a cheap ripoff compared to them.
So your comparing a 2d graphics editor to 3d modelling software? I don't get it. What other 2d image editing software do you consider 'professional'? Is it not fair to say in respect to the Gimp, as *it* being a cheap ripoff of Photoshop? Have a look at it's tools for example, everyone of them has been lifted from Photoshop, from the filters to the brush based tools like the magic wand and blur tool.