And the founding fathers were poor Irish immigrants.
The death tax has no real purpose other than raising tax money. SOP, tax what won't piss off the plebs.
Plus, don't you realize the heirs just blow it on toys and coke? Someone builds the toys and someone who builds the toys buys food. The coke helps to easy the economic hardships of third world producers.
All the government uses it for is funding the machine. Funny that both candidates this round were second-generation politicians, isn't it?
Power wasn't earned there, it was inherited, death tax or not.
Better yet, just kill all the children of the powerful. They're the enemy any ways, right?
- smoke that, hippies.
By your logic, once that is explained, It won't mean anything because people will say that we don't know what happened before the big bang, and before that, etc.
True, hence it is impossible to prove humans were not created by some god via what we "enlightened" humans call evolution. Like I said, agnostic. I don't disbelieve evolution at all, but for one to say that they can know without doubt that a god didn't create what we evolved from, etc, is just as ignorant as those that have faith that a god created man in the last ~6000 years. My only point. And, you are right, people will that we don't know what happened before the big bang. But who should care but the most hardcore of both arenas? Christianity, etc, aren't going to disappear no matter what someone says, unless of course god came to them and told them he does not exist.
Hell, right now we don't know what actually makes gravity, does that mean our theory of flight is incomplete?
First off, if it wasn't incomplete, it wouldn't be a theory.:)
But, none the less, without a doubt. Just as we can agree that evolution happens without having to know from what it all began. The theory of evolution is incomplete, just as flight is.
Point is, the quality of all we know is basically regulated by the quality of our maxims.
What's so funny about this is your inability to see their point of view.
I'm pretty much agnostic, no real faith, but smart enough to know I can't disprove it.
Anyways, evolution requires a parent, and bacteria is noted as a parent of the human, at least in the article. So, where did the bacteria come from? Spontaneous generation? Rather complicated thing to just spontaneously appear.
So, until your ilk can explain the evolution of the bacteria from the big bang, you don't get your cookie.
Slashdot Mirror
And the founding fathers were poor Irish immigrants. The death tax has no real purpose other than raising tax money. SOP, tax what won't piss off the plebs. Plus, don't you realize the heirs just blow it on toys and coke? Someone builds the toys and someone who builds the toys buys food. The coke helps to easy the economic hardships of third world producers. All the government uses it for is funding the machine. Funny that both candidates this round were second-generation politicians, isn't it? Power wasn't earned there, it was inherited, death tax or not. Better yet, just kill all the children of the powerful. They're the enemy any ways, right? - smoke that, hippies.
By your logic, once that is explained, It won't mean anything because people will say that we don't know what happened before the big bang, and before that, etc.
:)
True, hence it is impossible to prove humans were not created by some god via what we "enlightened" humans call evolution. Like I said, agnostic. I don't disbelieve evolution at all, but for one to say that they can know without doubt that a god didn't create what we evolved from, etc, is just as ignorant as those that have faith that a god created man in the last ~6000 years. My only point. And, you are right, people will that we don't know what happened before the big bang. But who should care but the most hardcore of both arenas? Christianity, etc, aren't going to disappear no matter what someone says, unless of course god came to them and told them he does not exist.
Hell, right now we don't know what actually makes gravity, does that mean our theory of flight is incomplete?
First off, if it wasn't incomplete, it wouldn't be a theory.
But, none the less, without a doubt. Just as we can agree that evolution happens without having to know from what it all began. The theory of evolution is incomplete, just as flight is.
Point is, the quality of all we know is basically regulated by the quality of our maxims.
What's so funny about this is your inability to see their point of view. I'm pretty much agnostic, no real faith, but smart enough to know I can't disprove it. Anyways, evolution requires a parent, and bacteria is noted as a parent of the human, at least in the article. So, where did the bacteria come from? Spontaneous generation? Rather complicated thing to just spontaneously appear. So, until your ilk can explain the evolution of the bacteria from the big bang, you don't get your cookie.