I would assume that they would be addressed by the mechanizm that created them inside the quantom computer. they would have to be sent in a physical direction by some sort of navigation device that shoots them in a streem of particals.
doesn't the article suggest that the tungston core makes the buckyball stronger while giving it trasport properties base on the spin of the tungston atom?
you have a market where on one side you have the sparc and on the other you have the Itanium.
an Itanium workstation would most likly cost around 2k. with a sparc station, which runs better than the Itanium, at half the price, buissness owners in need of a 64-bit system will likly go with Sun and not Dell.
on the Sun system the OS market is much more competitive than on the intel platform. there is Solaris, Linux,NetBSD, and NT4(which is a joke in comparison to the others)
Microsoft will get hurt more now because more people are buying Sun systems and in that market they have a vary week hand hold.
so they could end up losing bigtime when it comes to buissness profits.
I mean if you are going to buy a sun workstation why would you buy winblows and ruin the system?
hey even if it is agenst the law to hold illegal data it will never be illegal to transmit data. the packets are moving at the physical, transport, and network level, they do not supply anything to the data.
if illegal materials were moving through anarport does the airport and airline staff stop it or do the police stop it?
yeah and reading the Guru article a few posts earlier I get the feeling that this tech will still alow a copy from the original but not one from the copy of the original.....if that is what it ends up to be then its not that bad.....since to be able to get a boot leg one would have to run an operation out of his or her house making it a much more conspicuous activity than p2p or IRC and such.....I could live with that as long as I can make unlimited copies from the original.
do you realy want to depened on the average computer user?
do you know who that is?
it is the millions who use AOL and think they are realy on the internet. then when you tell them that they aren't, they look at you like you are on crack.
tell me if I am wrong but the article seemed to suggest that a copy was possable but one could not copy from the removable media that the first copy was made. i.e. third generation copies would not be possable.
dude, I don't care if the creators of a particular work want to protect there work or not, keeping people from copying it is there problem not the problem of Hard drive manufacturers.
by blocking the media or worse the MOBO data buses they are restricting my rights, I should have the right to break the law in protest of that said law. when I do, it is then my responsability to suffer any ramifications.
spin only has 2 states. if it had infinit states then QM would not be able to make predictions and would therefore never have been created.
I would assume that they would be addressed by the mechanizm that created them inside the quantom computer. they would have to be sent in a physical direction by some sort of navigation device that shoots them in a streem of particals.
:)
but i AM MOSTLIKLY WRONG ON ALL ACCOUNTS
no....a buckyball is a moleculare structure, a fullerene is a sub-atomic particle.
two seperate size scales.
doesn't the article suggest that the tungston core makes the buckyball stronger while giving it trasport properties base on the spin of the tungston atom?
------------
We need to develop sub-space comunication so we can quake with people on Mars in real time.
This could end up hurting M$ in the long run.
,NetBSD, and NT4(which is a joke in comparison to the others)
you have a market where on one side you have the sparc and on the other you have the Itanium.
an Itanium workstation would most likly cost around 2k. with a sparc station, which runs better than the Itanium, at half the price, buissness owners in need of a 64-bit system will likly go with Sun and not Dell.
on the Sun system the OS market is much more competitive than on the intel platform. there is Solaris, Linux
Microsoft will get hurt more now because more people are buying Sun systems and in that market they have a vary week hand hold.
so they could end up losing bigtime when it comes to buissness profits.
I mean if you are going to buy a sun workstation why would you buy winblows and ruin the system?
Do you live outside the United States?
:)
Equal speech is not the same as free speech.
Equal Speech just means that everyone can say what everyone else can say.
that does not guarantee a persons right to say what he or she wants when they want it(which is freedom of speech)
I could say that no one can say the word "Cat" and eveyone would have equal speech because no one can say "Cat".
sorry just a bit nit-pickie
otherwise, the rest of the statment is good.
-------------------
yeah and in a clump of shit there are carbon chains but guess what it is still a clump of shit
-----------
all that is is a flashy MC.
umm linux is multi tasking man not task switching like Winblows and i guess BEOS if what your post said was acurate
ummm....do you know anything? peer to peer?
how the fsck would that work?
I'm not Jewish but wtf is your problem? I hope that it is a joke!!! and if it is a joke, it is in vary bad tast.
sombody Mod this guy down so low no one will see this post!!!!
good point...the recording industry wants to maintain the value of there product and to do that they must restrict the number of "good" copies
hey even if it is agenst the law to hold illegal data it will never be illegal to transmit data. the packets are moving at the physical, transport, and network level, they do not supply anything to the data.
;)
if illegal materials were moving through anarport does the airport and airline staff stop it or do the police stop it?
A: the police
yeah and reading the Guru article a few posts earlier I get the feeling that this tech will still alow a copy from the original but not one from the copy of the original.....if that is what it ends up to be then its not that bad.....since to be able to get a boot leg one would have to run an operation out of his or her house making it a much more conspicuous activity than p2p or IRC and such.....I could live with that as long as I can make unlimited copies from the original.
umm since when is a HARDWARE access control an implementation of SOFTWARE
that you tell them so they know why there profits decresed .000000001% from the lack of slashdoters buying there products :)
do you realy want to depened on the average computer user?
do you know who that is?
it is the millions who use AOL and think they are realy on the internet. then when you tell them that they aren't, they look at you like you are on crack.
yep real dependable.
that vaporware only seems to be somthing that we think is realy cool but companies always come through with the tech that we hate.
tell me if I am wrong but the article seemed to suggest that a copy was possable but one could not copy from the removable media that the first copy was made. i.e. third generation copies would not be possable.
but not by controling the media or buses that it is transmited along. that is what has no legal basis
hey mabye this will lead open source companies to make more hardware!!!
dude, I don't care if the creators of a particular work want to protect there work or not, keeping people from copying it is there problem not the problem of Hard drive manufacturers.
by blocking the media or worse the MOBO data buses they are restricting my rights, I should have the right to break the law in protest of that said law. when I do, it is then my responsability to suffer any ramifications.
my decision not theirs.
and how does that chainge my reasoning?
Puting speed control devices into Cars so that it forces everyone to move at the posted speed limit.
IMHO it is mor dangerouse to do this because somone will learn how to diable it and many people will get hurt when he flies through traffic
CPRM is just bad