updated to reflect real world: [root@kjell root]# host crl.verisign.net crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.206 crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.200 crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.201 crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.202 crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.205
as of
serial = 2004010701 Thu Jan 8 23:17:57 CET 2004
This might not seem important, but if you (read:/.) want to be taken seriously by the (printing) press, you might want to have your acronyms straight...
a good friend of mine told me a log time ago 2 qustions ought to be enough
1) do you like to be called a nerd
2) do you have a network at home
both answers should be yes ofcource.
the later questions should also be changed during time. nowadays every win-me boy [m/f] has a network at home, so you might want to change this towards
"do you have 802.11b at home"
or "do you have more than 1 os at home"
> Of course, CICSO will charge an arm and a leg for that "feature"...
in fact CAR has been arround for some time and can help you here. Note however that if one weird protocol wants to talk on ICMP you will filter (or al least dampen) this protcol. The same holds true fro UDP and others. Also note that against a smurf attack you cant easaly protet yourself.
see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/so ftware/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c/qcpart4/qcpolts.htm>cis c o's car
As an Amercian with a decent grounding in Dutch, let me say that it IS an obscure language.
Dutch might have been a "world" language. When the USoA had to decide what language to pick as their national language (no, the Americans didn't invent English:-) the senate was one vote short for Dutch being the primary language in the USoA.
My God, the Dutch language would have rich words like "moederneuker"...
It's not THAT surprising that an American doesn't know
Good for yo, Canadians! Anyway, I dont get it. It seems that MessyDos has a *far* better PR department than my employer has (suprise:-). In the Netherlands KPN has a fully redundant 2.4 Gb network between 4 cities for internet connections already. See dutch kpn site
> Interesting observation - can a phone book listing be copyrighted?
According to Dutch law, it seems that phone book listings are indeed (sort of) copyrighted. KPN (the former state owned telco) has successfully frightened companies that put data online that they will go to court regarding online phone book data.
A number of companies have tried to copy the data. Some of them claimed that people in China handcopied all entries in the phone book (which is legal). However, KPN put phoney phone numbers in their digital database and could show that the data was digitally copied.
Strange, a written version is without copyright, a digital is not.
Has anybody printed out the whois database in the Netherlands?:-)
Slashdot Mirror
updated to reflect real world:
[root@kjell root]# host crl.verisign.net
crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.206
crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.200
crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.201
crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.202
crl.verisign.net has address 198.49.161.205
as of
serial = 2004010701
Thu Jan 8 23:17:57 CET 2004
note the 01 in 2004010701
feedster has been doing that for along time. more intelligent i might add, based on images in rdf newsfeeds.
see my dutch page regaring this: //willy dobbe
as in liquid crystal Display Display?
This might not seem important, but if you (read:
a good friend of mine told me a log time ago 2 qustions ought to be enough
1) do you like to be called a nerd
2) do you have a network at home
both answers should be yes ofcource.
the later questions should also be changed during time. nowadays every win-me boy [m/f] has a network at home, so you might want to change this towards
"do you have 802.11b at home"
or "do you have more than 1 os at home"
just my dime
> Something about the session ID seems to be ..
/. community.
> broken here
weird indeed. On the other hand, think about it when something like that will hapen to the
Will people behave differnt logged in as someone else? Flame? Troll?
Actually it would be an interesting social experiment to let people log in as someone else on aprils fool!
Hi, /. community to know who he is, but gives his (real?) name to theeconomist.
its seems that Philip Gross doensnt want the
I think theeconomist will get a lot of hist from him today. "Logged in as Philip Gross "
This raises another point: Why isnt theeconomist using cookies and puts the userid in the URI?
> Of course, CICSO will charge an arm and a leg for that "feature"...
o ftware/ios120/12cgcr/qos_c/qcpart4/qcpolts.htm>cis c o's car
in fact CAR has been arround for some time and can help you here. Note however that if one weird protocol wants to talk on ICMP you will filter (or al least dampen) this protcol. The same holds true fro UDP and others. Also note that against a smurf attack you cant easaly protet yourself.
see http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/s
As an Amercian with a decent grounding in Dutch, let me say that it IS an obscure language.
:-) the senate was one vote short for Dutch being the primary language in the USoA.
:-)
Dutch might have been a "world" language. When the USoA had to decide what language to pick as their national language (no, the Americans didn't invent English
My God, the Dutch language would have rich words like "moederneuker"...
It's not THAT surprising that an American doesn't know
no comments
Good for yo, Canadians! Anyway, I dont get it. It seems that MessyDos has a *far* better PR department than my employer has (suprise :-). In the Netherlands KPN has a fully redundant 2.4 Gb network between 4 cities for internet connections already. See dutch kpn site
... to get into the networksolutions.com account ;o)
> Interesting observation - can a phone book listing be copyrighted?
:-)
According to Dutch law, it seems that phone book listings are indeed (sort of) copyrighted. KPN (the former state owned telco) has successfully frightened companies that put data online that they will go to court regarding online phone book data.
A number of companies have tried to copy the data. Some of them claimed that people in China handcopied all entries in the phone book (which is legal). However, KPN put phoney phone numbers in their digital database and could show that the data was digitally copied.
Strange, a written version is without copyright, a digital is not.
Has anybody printed out the whois database in the Netherlands?