You could always do both. W3C specifications only go so far - and CSS is often manipulable to the point where you can make stuff work on all browsers (obviously using some conditional markup comments and NOT the holly hack).
If you don't conform to W3C standards, it's likely that come the next release of The Internet (nice post, I nearly cried), there will be no middle ground from which to start when fixing layout problems.
Slashdot Mirror
They could at least spell XHTML correctly...
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Falpha.search.wikia.com%2F
Fox has its shows online with fewer ads than on TV, and they download a lot faster than a torrent.
You're welcome!
Synaptic in Ubuntu does most of those. Though, I'm guessing by your extreme demands that you aren't a GUI fan.
Not sure why you'd want to use a cgi library directly...
Rails everything! Yes, almost.
You obviously haven't discovered the advanced options for Google Images...
Send me an 'internets' sometime!
That's not HTML, though it could parse as XML, despite the lack of declaration.
Yeah, I always did want @compuserve.com...
Graphical submit buttons should always have a 'title' attribute, that way, some text will appear before the image loads.
I hope this becomes mandatory in XHTML1.2 (or whatever comes next). Not that half the world validate their HTML...
You could always do both. W3C specifications only go so far - and CSS is often manipulable to the point where you can make stuff work on all browsers (obviously using some conditional markup comments and NOT the holly hack).
If you don't conform to W3C standards, it's likely that come the next release of The Internet (nice post, I nearly cried), there will be no middle ground from which to start when fixing layout problems.
I'd feel much more comfortable copying the game and giving £3 to charity.
http://www.pinetreeline.org/photos/pagwa/pagwa109. jpg