Basically U Fsck-tard. It's not a fault of the CCD for the video camera (there is plenty of cheap CCDs with enough resolution to do HD). It's the lack of stoage space is why consumers do not have HD video cameras. Tape in your camera isn't going to keep up with the data rates. DIVX and other compression technologys will allow HD for the consumer at home.
But I'm sure you have your HDTV with a direct feed it's not mpeg-2:rolleyes: And I hear you complaining... Once again another datarate problem with high resolution video.
Sorry you can't see past 1st base. HD resolutions require a lot of storage space. DIVX compression allows one to store HD resoltions in a small space with excellent quality.
I can see your a purist by your "Recording in MPEG-4 is about as bright as music studios recording CD masters in MP3"
However your a moron. Your HD comes to you VERY compressed... MPEG-2. Can't get it any other way... DOH. And for home use, which is what I was talking about. A little compression would mean shit, if you could play with HD at home.
LOL, ya, with analog signals, when you startwith shit, VHS, you end with SHIT. I don't care what you convert it too.
Ever see why they have problems making IMAX recordings. It's because of the huge camera required for filming. Once again if this was done digitally, which at the moment I don't believe is possible in a portable until. DIVX and or better compression technologys will allow things like this to be possible. Or mabye some new storage medium. And then compression will mean shit. However companys seem to like you owning these magnetic devices that break down.
Actually quite a few years older than that. Since your the one posting anonymously, I would assume you are the younger one. Time to lay off the coffee...
Sorry you can't handle your job, or the reality that you work in an industry filled with "certified morons". Maybe you should consider a career change? You obviously have a obfuscated view on realty. However I do agree I have been reading about the immigrants taking US jobs. So what are you doing about it accept ranting and raving to me in a thread about video camera that support MPEG-4? Sounds kinda pathetic to me.
You don't even know what I do for a living. Maybe I am the doctor at the mental insitute. You are running on asumptions... I have been in my carrer for 8+ years. So if I was 18... Guess I started at 10 eh?
I highly suggest some yoga lessons for you. And maybe switch to decaf.
It doesn't support DVD,VHS, BETA, Compact Flash, PCMCIA...
Good you enjoy your old technology. Move aside and let the rest of us who want the better stuff ahead of you. MPEG-4 products will eventually allow us consumers to record at HD resolutions cheap. I'm all for products using the new technology. Your probably one of those guys who still likes VCD(s), and thinks DIVX/SVCD is not much better. Things like this take baby steps as it takes time to be accepted to the masses. So shaddup and go back to your hole.
I would have to agree. I listen to most of my music on A pair of STAX electrostatic headphones, with a Class-A tube amp. All of my D/A is done on a ALTIS reference converter. Most people don't realize the ammount of bandwidth on vinyl is far superior to the 44kz of a CD. In fact really not comparable. Though I must admit in my listenings I have found vinyl to have a much better reproduction of high frequency tones vs. a CD which seems to reproduce low frequencys much better than vinyl would.
CDs were created for convenience mainly, not sound quality. A direct to vinyl recording will knock any AAD or ADD anyday... To anyone with a good ear and an excellent sound reproduction device. As most posts on here are consumer grade audio reproduction. Having Class-A amplifiers, and a set of near field studio monitors are night and day to the higher percentage of equipment listed in this thread. As most people could not hear the difference. Especially any idiot listening to music on a 5.1 system!:-P
I'm sure those 5.1 systems are +/- 1db from 100-20kz... LOL
Being a audio purist myself. I'm sure not going to pay full price for an MP3 album. As they just do not sound as good. So I hope they discount a bit for quality too... Or do they just plan to send ya the whole 600MB or so.;)
Slashdot Mirror
Basically U Fsck-tard. It's not a fault of the CCD for the video camera (there is plenty of cheap CCDs with enough resolution to do HD). It's the lack of stoage space is why consumers do not have HD video cameras. Tape in your camera isn't going to keep up with the data rates. DIVX and other compression technologys will allow HD for the consumer at home.
:rolleyes: And I hear you complaining... Once again another datarate problem with high resolution video.
But I'm sure you have your HDTV with a direct feed it's not mpeg-2
Sorry you can't see past 1st base. HD resolutions require a lot of storage space. DIVX compression allows one to store HD resoltions in a small space with excellent quality.
I can see your a purist by your "Recording in MPEG-4 is about as bright as music studios recording CD masters in MP3"
However your a moron. Your HD comes to you VERY compressed... MPEG-2. Can't get it any other way... DOH. And for home use, which is what I was talking about. A little compression would mean shit, if you could play with HD at home.
LOL, ya, with analog signals, when you startwith shit, VHS, you end with SHIT. I don't care what you convert it too.
Ever see why they have problems making IMAX recordings. It's because of the huge camera required for filming. Once again if this was done digitally, which at the moment I don't believe is possible in a portable until. DIVX and or better compression technologys will allow things like this to be possible. Or mabye some new storage medium. And then compression will mean shit. However companys seem to like you owning these magnetic devices that break down.
Actually quite a few years older than that. Since your the one posting anonymously, I would assume you are the younger one. Time to lay off the coffee...
Sorry you can't handle your job, or the reality that you work in an industry filled with "certified morons". Maybe you should consider a career change? You obviously have a obfuscated view on realty. However I do agree I have been reading about the immigrants taking US jobs. So what are you doing about it accept ranting and raving to me in a thread about video camera that support MPEG-4? Sounds kinda pathetic to me.
You don't even know what I do for a living. Maybe I am the doctor at the mental insitute. You are running on asumptions... I have been in my carrer for 8+ years. So if I was 18... Guess I started at 10 eh?
I highly suggest some yoga lessons for you. And maybe switch to decaf.
It's either sink or swim. Your more than welcome to watch the world run past you. However its not going to stop and wait you to catch up.
It will not be $10240142814562751725
It doesn't support DVD,VHS, BETA, Compact Flash, PCMCIA...
Good you enjoy your old technology. Move aside and let the rest of us who want the better stuff ahead of you. MPEG-4 products will eventually allow us consumers to record at HD resolutions cheap. I'm all for products using the new technology. Your probably one of those guys who still likes VCD(s), and thinks DIVX/SVCD is not much better. Things like this take baby steps as it takes time to be accepted to the masses. So shaddup and go back to your hole.
Maximum operating distance of at least 12 m (40 feet).
guess I missed this part... OOPS
Still wish it was RF based instead of IR.
Infrared sensing distance approximately 2 cm to 30 cm (1 inch to 12 inches).
:rollyes:
Why bother if you have to be within a foot of the receiver...
NEXT!
Actually... the quality of your DAC (digital analog converter) will make the night and day difference in sound quality!!!
most CDROMs have cheap DACs in them.
The best way is to run everything digital to an external DAC converter. But they re expensive anywhere from $500-$15,000.
A tube DAC is definetly a good choice for smooth high end frequencys.
-Cul8rz
I would have to agree. I listen to most of my music on A pair of STAX electrostatic headphones, with a Class-A tube amp. All of my D/A is done on a ALTIS reference converter. Most people don't realize the ammount of bandwidth on vinyl is far superior to the 44kz of a CD. In fact really not comparable. Though I must admit in my listenings I have found vinyl to have a much better reproduction of high frequency tones vs. a CD which seems to reproduce low frequencys much better than vinyl would.
:-P
CDs were created for convenience mainly, not sound quality. A direct to vinyl recording will knock any AAD or ADD anyday... To anyone with a good ear and an excellent sound reproduction device. As most posts on here are consumer grade audio reproduction. Having Class-A amplifiers, and a set of near field studio monitors are night and day to the higher percentage of equipment listed in this thread. As most people could not hear the difference. Especially any idiot listening to music on a 5.1 system!
I'm sure those 5.1 systems are +/- 1db from 100-20kz... LOL
-Cul8rZ
Being a audio purist myself. I'm sure not going to pay full price for an MP3 album. As they just do not sound as good. So I hope they discount a bit for quality too... Or do they just plan to send ya the whole 600MB or so. ;)