Ok, nothing happened, please move on with your lives and buggy programs. Main thing is, you do not have to learn from anyones mistakes.
Or what?
Have a look here: RFC2550: Y10K and beyond. Would not it be cool to say that my fave' os is Y10K compliant. (sp?)
This RFC is mostly humour oriented, but the solution it gives is worth thinking about. (197x Cobolhead would take the y2k bug also with humour...)
BTW: I do not know the visions of BSDers, but I recall that for Linus it is ok, that Linux is replaced by 'something better' in ~30 years... How much have I heard sayings like this?
Slashdotters like to whine... (Thank god they are not intellectuals:)
In any case, this is just typical whining by somebody who doesn't like the answers he's getting from organized religion and therefore assumes that there are no good answers.
Yeah, and definitely you do not get your answers from Jon Katz.
Actually this was a quite polite comment in style JonKatzIsACompleteIdiot. But hey, this is what we deserve! Most original articles on Slashdot come from Jon Katz. (ee, or is it half? ee, anyway quite many..;) Seems like he is one of the few contributing more than a link-with-a-smart-comment or comment-saying-you-dont-have-a-clue Yeah sure, he is not perfect. But if you feel his articles are clueless/incorrect/he-made-no-research-type, then do yourself some research and compose a groundbreaking (heh) article yourself. Slashdot standars are not that high that you should worry about rejecting.
You are afraid that some AC will say you-dont-have-a-clue? (heheh)
I mean: we see that so-called mainstream media is quite clueless about some topics. But only thing on slashdot is commenting about them? (Mostly whining though) What about original ThisArticlTalksTheRightThing type articles? I can understand that this kind of a articles does not sell on mainstream media. But why-oh-why they do not appear here? Nobody likes to write them too? But then you get what you deserved.
Maybe we should apply some show-me-code principle here too? Or is this only for those weird-ass-kernel-developers?
On slashdot there must be some clueful people who have something to write about. Or are the responses Jon Katz recieves horrifing them away?
(Yeah here it goes: Where are you own articles? - I am not a article-writer type. I am no comment poster either. But here definitely are persons who are. (JonKatz is proof) (Those hundred good comments are also proof.) I try to encourage them.)
-- Yeah, this comment sucks. It is not my fault, anyway. And this is as much english as I managed.
Slashdot Mirror
MFC: Merge From -Current
I may be wrong, but isnt this 'BSD does not corrupt / Linux corrupts fs' because Linux mounts by default filesystems in async mode, BSD in sync mode?
Or what?
Have a look here: RFC2550: Y10K and beyond. Would not it be cool to say that my fave' os is Y10K compliant. (sp?)
This RFC is mostly humour oriented, but the solution it gives is worth thinking about. (197x Cobolhead would take the y2k bug also with humour...)
BTW: I do not know the visions of BSDers, but I recall that for Linus it is ok, that Linux is replaced by 'something better' in ~30 years... How much have I heard sayings like this?
(serious tone not intended)
Slashdotters like to whine... (Thank god they are not intellectuals :)
In any case, this is just typical whining by somebody who doesn't like the answers he's getting from organized religion and therefore assumes that there are no good answers.
Yeah, and definitely you do not get your answers from Jon Katz.
Actually this was a quite polite comment in style JonKatzIsACompleteIdiot. But hey, this is what we deserve! Most original articles on Slashdot come from Jon Katz. (ee, or is it half? ee, anyway quite many.. ;) Seems like he is one of the few contributing more than a link-with-a-smart-comment or comment-saying-you-dont-have-a-clue Yeah sure, he is not perfect. But if you feel his articles are clueless/incorrect/he-made-no-research-type, then do yourself some research and compose a groundbreaking (heh) article yourself. Slashdot standars are not that high that you should worry about rejecting.
You are afraid that some AC will say you-dont-have-a-clue? (heheh)
I mean: we see that so-called mainstream media is quite clueless about some topics. But only thing on slashdot is commenting about them? (Mostly whining though) What about original ThisArticlTalksTheRightThing type articles? I can understand that this kind of a articles does not sell on mainstream media. But why-oh-why they do not appear here? Nobody likes to write them too? But then you get what you deserved.
Maybe we should apply some show-me-code principle here too? Or is this only for those weird-ass-kernel-developers?
On slashdot there must be some clueful people who have something to write about. Or are the responses Jon Katz recieves horrifing them away?
(Yeah here it goes: Where are you own articles? - I am not a article-writer type. I am no comment poster either. But here definitely are persons who are. (JonKatz is proof) (Those hundred good comments are also proof.) I try to encourage them.)
--
Yeah, this comment sucks.
It is not my fault, anyway.
And this is as much english as I managed.
Solutions:
* restrict access to security weaknesses (net censoring/eavesdropping/illegalizing reverse engineering/etc...)
*