If you read carefully (the Wired article isn't written very clearly), the judge denied AOL's request for "a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction" against AT&T--i.e., forcing AT&T to stop using these alleged trademark violations pending a final court decision. This judge clearly did not buy AOL's initial presentation of the story, which doesn't bode well for AOL--but nothing has been finalized yet.
Slashdot Mirror
If you read carefully (the Wired article isn't written very clearly), the judge denied AOL's request for "a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction" against AT&T--i.e., forcing AT&T to stop using these alleged trademark violations pending a final court decision. This judge clearly did not buy AOL's initial presentation of the story, which doesn't bode well for AOL--but nothing has been finalized yet.