Slashdot Mirror


User: Russ+Nelson

Russ+Nelson's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,476
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,476

  1. Shhhhhh! on Robert X. Cringely Weighs in on 2006 · · Score: -1, Troll

    Shhhhhh! I'm reading TFA, so don't anybody post until I'm done.
    -russ

  2. The erosion of freedom on Real ID Act Poses Technical Challenges · · Score: 1

    So, they're going to make provision for names only as long as 128 characters? What are they going to do with the people whose names are longer than that? It's not legal to use abbreviations or nicknames. What if I change my name to "Russsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss sssssssssssssssssssssssss
    Nelson"? Oh, but I won't have the freedom to do that, because they'll make it illegal (rather than doing the obvious and allowing for database fields of unlimited length). Why do I want such a stupid freedom? Because that is what freedom is all about: the freedom to do stupid things. Freedom is not about the actions other people don't mind. Freedom is about being able to do things that Other People Object To.

  3. Re:No Open Source Community? on There is No Open Source Community · · Score: 1

    I have no record that you donated $100 to the Open Source Initiative. If you had, then surely you would have received your membership card by now.
    -russ

  4. there really is no such thing as society on There is No Open Source Community · · Score: 1

    If society exists, what is its address? How do I send it email? Society exists in the same sense that air exists. But air is not an entity. It doesn't have needs, goals, dreams, or any other attributes that you hear "society" has. Anything that "society" wants is exactly equal to what the individuals living in a society want; there is nothing left over to attribute to "society". The whole is exactly the sum of its parts; no more.
    -russ

  5. Re:I agree one 100% on There is No Open Source Community · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um ... the original design of the US (small central government with most laws enacted by states) doesn't exist anymore. That ball stopped rolling a long time ago.
    -russ

  6. Software isn't sentient yet on There is No Open Source Community · · Score: 1

    Perhaps software will want to be free when software has feelings. Until then, we need to consiider what is best for users. If free software isn't being produced in an area, is it still "software hoarding"?
    -russ

  7. David is right, but the road is rocky on The Choice Between DRM and Security · · Score: 1

    David is right, but dinosaurs do not die prettily. There is no obvious path from here to a world where all digital data is freely copyable AND people are compensated for producing it.
    -russ

  8. DRM inherently disrupts proper operation on The Choice Between DRM and Security · · Score: 1

    The problem with DRM is that it inherently disrupts proper operation of your computer. A general purpose computer cannot both stop you from playing digital data off media, and copying it. DRM is incompatible with reliability.
    -russ

  9. Because otherwise I'll puke. on 'The IT Crowd' UK Sit-com · · Score: 1

    If I see one more 9 track tape in a movie involving computers, I'm gonna puke.
    -russ

  10. Re:Devouring? on Beginning Python: From Novice to Professional · · Score: 1

    You forgot "Open Source is not Free Software", as long as we're listing silly ideas.
    -russ

  11. Re:Devouring? on Beginning Python: From Novice to Professional · · Score: 1

    you realize, of course, that you just increased the hit count for each of those strings, meaninglessly.
    -russ

  12. How about not issuing invalid patents? on Open-source Overhauls Patent System · · Score: 1

    It would be a good start if the USPTO could start by not issuing invalid patents. For example, patents which are patently obvious, or patents with well-known but not published prior art, or patents for devices that don't work, or patents which rely on techniques that haven't been invented yet -- but when they are, this patent will have priority.

    For example, you could require that a functioning device which implements the claims of the patent must be sold within a year of the granting of the patent.

  13. 5 hours of sleep?? on Computers, Long Hours and Vision Problems? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're only getting 5 hours of sleep a night?? And you think there's something wrong with your monitor or glasses?
    -russ

  14. Re:gates following in Rockefeller's footsteps on The Softening of a Software Man · · Score: 1

    So ... they funded leftists in order to reduce leftism?? Are you confused or just confused?
    -russ

  15. Re:eBook on Nokia 770 Alive and Well · · Score: 1

    You'll not soon find an open source GPS receiver with routing like TomTom. The routing databases sell for substantial amounts of money and even if you could buy them as a stand-alone product, they're in a proprietary undocumented format.

    I'm going to port pygps to the 770, but it uses pixmaps, not vector maps. Then again, I WANT pixmaps and not vector maps.
    -russ

  16. Competition on Google to Transform Television Advertising? · · Score: 1

    No company EVER wants to lower their margins. They ONLY reason they do it is because competition in a free market forces them to. All hail free markets!
    -russ

  17. Re:but some idiots say there is no such thing on (Yet) Another Year End List · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see you express the idea that we have everything to fear from the people with guns, including the people nominally protecting us. For many people, their worst enemy is their own government. We have it good in democratic countries. Non-free governments have killed hundreds of millions of their own citizens (documented fact, not statistic pulled from my butt).
    -russ

  18. Re:but some idiots say there is no such thing on (Yet) Another Year End List · · Score: 1

    Sorry, your EDIT is wrong. You can see this by comparing the poor in societies with free markets to the poor in societies without free markets.

    And your second paragraph is also wrong. In a truly free market, the participants will create rules. Do some research on "law merchant". Or don't, but you'll continue to post nonsense.
    -russ

  19. what is he taking OUT? on Bjarne Stroustrup Previews C++0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's much more interesting to me to hear about what Barne will be taking OUT of C++. Adding features is the easy, wimpy part of the job. Removing them is the part that takes cohones.
    -russ

  20. Re:Free markets make plenty sense... on (Yet) Another Year End List · · Score: 1

    Maybe we should call them Open Markets instead? But then RMS would start inveighing against that, saying "Free Markets are not Open Markets!"
    -russ

  21. but some idiots say there is no such thing on (Yet) Another Year End List · · Score: 1

    The trouble with that joke ("I went to the free market but nothing was free") is that some idiots say that there is no such thing as a free market. In essence that's true just as there is no such thing as an object at absolute zero. Markets are never "free"; they are always more or less free than other markets. As you observed, markets which are more free produce more wealth for the participants than markets which are interfered with to achieve some nominally desirable purpose like equality or justice.
    -russ

  22. Re:Yawn... Nothing here, move along please. on Google Talk Targeted In Patent Lawsuit · · Score: 1

    class-based analysis of society leads to misconceptions.
    -russ

  23. Re:Yawn... Nothing here, move along please. on Google Talk Targeted In Patent Lawsuit · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding me? It's called "least cost call routing" and is pretty much a no-brainer.

    You don't understand how this scam works: first, get a patent. It should be something broadly written so that everything plausibly infringes it. Then you go to a small company and say "You infringe this patent. We will sue you, or you can settle for $100." Obviously the small company settles; it would be insane to do anything else. You keep going go more and more companies, increasing the settlement offer; but always keeping it below the price of winning a lawsuit.

    One of these days some Attorney General planning to run for Governor will wise up to this scam, and go after these firms for criminal extortion.
    -russ

  24. Re:sure, if by nowadays, you mean on Google Talk Targeted In Patent Lawsuit · · Score: 1

    The trouble is that so often these days, the "invention" is obvious, or has prior art.
    -russ

  25. cash settlement and free downloads?? on Sony Settlement Start of DRM Protection Act? · · Score: 3, Funny

    "cash settlement and free downloads?" How much do you want to bet that the lawyers will get the cash settment, and the much buyers (aka victims) will get the free downloads?
    -russ
    p.s. yes, I AM that cynical.