Visual C++ 1.52c is the last version that could generate 16-bit code, which is needed to compile part of the boot loader for full disk/system encryption. The other solution would have been to write all the thing in assembly (or replaced the portion with the pre-compiled code instead), but that wouldn't have made more people happy to reverse-engineer more assembly, would it?
I meant, v7.1a is not backdoored *by the TrueCrypt developers between the sources and the binaries*, nothing more. I'll edit the sentence to make it clear.
Nop, but now you know this has to be sorted out by code auditing, not by speculations about the official binaries. Baby steps.
Visual C++ 1.52c is the last version that could generate 16-bit code, which is needed to compile part of the boot loader for full disk/system encryption. The other solution would have been to write all the thing in assembly (or replaced the portion with the pre-compiled code instead), but that wouldn't have made more people happy to reverse-engineer more assembly, would it?
I meant, v7.1a is not backdoored *by the TrueCrypt developers between the sources and the binaries*, nothing more. I'll edit the sentence to make it clear.
Haha, sorry I wrote that too fast.