Perhaps it isn't possible to prove we aren't in a simulation from within that same simulation but does this prove that we ourselves could never create a simulation as complex as the one we (possibly) live in?
So we have an ongoing court case currently in N.Ireland where a christian bakery refused to make a cake with a pro-gay slogan since it went against their beliefs: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-n...
It isn't that they would refuse all service to a gay couple, rather that they refuse to bake items against their beliefs.
On the radio they were discussing the story and comparing it to forcing a muslim owned business to publish a cartoon mocking Muhammad.
If you say it is illegal to refuse then you essentially aren't you putting them out of business unless they are willing to forego their beliefs.
Not happening anytime soon but when we have fusion power stations then what will be the best distributed fuel source?
Would hydrogen not be a good choice then?
Perhaps it isn't possible to prove we aren't in a simulation from within that same simulation but does this prove that we ourselves could never create a simulation as complex as the one we (possibly) live in?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-n...
It isn't that they would refuse all service to a gay couple, rather that they refuse to bake items against their beliefs.
On the radio they were discussing the story and comparing it to forcing a muslim owned business to publish a cartoon mocking Muhammad.
If you say it is illegal to refuse then you essentially aren't you putting them out of business unless they are willing to forego their beliefs.
Not happening anytime soon but when we have fusion power stations then what will be the best distributed fuel source? Would hydrogen not be a good choice then?