Ahh, [current year]. The year of everyone that doesn't agree with me is a Russian-bot. I can't wait for the next [current year], just to see what kind of pathetic meme idiots like you try to use next.
I really think you're overvaluing Google and Amazon. Plus the NRA has been kind of cucked for years, but at least they provide an easy target for idiotic leftist that don't realize other well funded gun rights groups with teams of lawyers do the real legwork of fighting for gun rights in the courts in the courts.
Well that's because the NRA is OBVIOUSLY responsible for EVERY SINGLE shooting that happens. Just like every Cloud Flair is responsible for every act of piracy that happens, Ford is responsible for every car crash, pharmaceutical manufacturers are responsible for every single OD, every single Mullah is responsible for every act of Islamist terror, and every single white male is reasonable for pretty much everything.
It's the [Current Year] and no one has any time for reasonable discussion. Just ban everything and you're a racist for not knowing this already.
They actually want to get rid of the Nazis and are looking for ways to do it effectively.
Yes, because there totally is a real problem with 1930s style socialism loving German nationalist on Twitter. Oh, of course I know that's what you mean. What you mean to say that everyone you don't agree with is Hitler.
Hey, if you're going to go full blown Godwin's law right off the bat that I'm not going to treat you with any respect or credibly. Especially when you're going to start citing every single retarded trope and accusation against other communities and platforms that the left has declared to be 'literally Hitler'. Hell, I don't even like most social media. Twitter, Gab, or Reddit. Some parts of 4Chan are fun, but I don't actually like Nazi memes. They're kind of dumb.
But as a final point I'll also point out that the idea of no-platforming any social out-group has literally zero chance of working in the long run. You'll just drive them underground and build more more social resentment towards to the point you actually end up invigorating these extremest groups. It's just basic human psychology.
And that's exactly the problem right there. Politically driving assholes trying to use their positions of power to suppresses view points they don't like.
After all, a clearly laid out TOS that get's evenly reinforced would solve 90% of your problems. But the moment when you begin to give an unaccoutable secretive group of enforces power over the rest of the platform you will eventually end up with some levels of abuse.
What I just said about Drudge isn't even from the abstract. It's from the Online Supplement that came with it. I did in fact read through this tripe, which is why I understood the very serious flaws in it. Specially about how this study laid out a list arbitrary attributes about what constitutes 'junk news'. Many of which are absolutely pointless in terms of the quality of the reporting itself. It should also be noted in the list of websites that the author of this BS declares as 'junk' seem to be entirely right wing.
Beyond that, to think that there are no left wing junk news sites is laughable. By the standards set in this study sites like Slate, Buzzfeed, Raw Story, and the Huffington Post would all be 'junk news'. Yet not a single one of these websites are labeled as junk news in this study. And if you think these sites are not junk news by the standard set in the study then you yourself are beyond partisan.
So you took statements about problematic study methodology and try to deflect away with an example of an isolated example of a nut that bought into some actual fake news.
Well actually there is an example that's somewhat like that. The 2017 shooting in Alexandria, Virginia, of Republican politicians by a far left partisan at a congressional baseball game.
There's so much wrong with this study that it could be a study itself in how bad research is done. The most glaring is that the author of this tripe laid out an arbitrary categories of what the author believes to be what is and is not a legitimate news site. Many of which have little to do with what the information reports actually is, but the style in which it is presented. One of the most glaring examples of which is that The Drudge Reported is considered fake news. Drudge is little more than a basic news aggregator. It's also very questionable that while there is a list of sites that are considered 'junk' it does not say why exactly each site is considered 'junk'.
Google isn't even trust worthy enough to handle my email without (trying) to monetizing it. So I sure as hell aren't going to give them access to my financial services.
Given that any real economic assessment of the so called wage game has systematically disproven it we're now left with the parts of the EU just using this as an excuse to pass any new regulation they want. That can't possible end in economic catastrophe when people are legally required to hire people passed on their physical gender instead of weather or not they're worth a damn.
Of course. After all far left academia have been rewriting the definitions of everything for years now. Be it the idea of what is racism to the very concept of gender. All while the news media covers for them by writing puff piece after puff piece proclaiming the virtues of these bat-shit and abjectly false notions.
Twitter is little more than a digital version of some a-hole writing something on the wall of a public restroom. Mostly a collection of advertisements and banal BS. It's not like we have someone writing profound tresses on the human condition there.
Hell.. personally I really believe that the entire act of doing this was nothing more than a giant advertising campaign for Twitter using former President Obama's connection to the media.
And why shouldn't we? No one wanted to be tracked. And even more corporatist a-holes like Google have persistently gone out of their way to obscure the end users ability to even know how the system works. Screw them. It's our hardware, and it's our data. If you have a problem with this then Google should release a version of their OS that you can pay and doesn't track us and avoid the situation entirely.
Personally I've just never upgraded beyond Windows 7, as I just don't see any utility for any of the latest updates. Yes, I a am concerned about keeping my security updated. But other than that I just don't care. And of all the people I know that do use 10 I have not yet met a single person that gives a damn about the S version at all. The two people I know that had a device with S eventually got ride of the device entirely thanks to their dislike of the product as a whole.
One of the things that people don't really know about how news is produced is that the large news outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox are just glorified middle men. All they do is collect reporting from local affiliates, the Associated Press, and other more independent journalist to create glorified talk shows where well polished pundits comment open it. It's been that way since the major TV networks began to hand their news gather wings over to the entertainment departments.
Okay now your just flat out lying. And as such I'm not going to response to anything you say beyond this.
ALL solar systems are very much affected by particulate matter in the air, that shit does NOT just 'blow off'. In fact most of them require large amount of water to constantly clean the fucking things. There's also the problem that Solar panels are not eternal. In fact temperature changes in them is why the eventually start to fail. And then you also have the nice problem with disposing of large amount of toxic materials that are used in the construction of the damn things.
Again, everything has a cost. And right wow China is going to use coal, and it's going to keep using coal for generations. In fact they're probably just going to refine their own emissions control systems before they waste resources on building solar technology that will never meet their own rapidly growing energy demand.
And also I guess we're just supposed to forget that China has rampant problems with air quality and particular matter. All of which really fucks with solar power efficient. And you're just not going to ramp up one enough to displace the other.
Of course at all assumes that the Chinese government isn't just lying about their plans and capability to even do this. Something that the government of that nation has systemic problems with doing both historically and today. yeah that whole 'Great Leap Forward' thing is kind of a big deal. Killed a few tens of millions of people, you know. Maybe you should look into it.
I did notice that your graph mentions that only about 4% of that power comes from Wind and only 1.1% comes from solar. The next biggest chuck of it is coming from hydroelectric at 19.7% I guess you think building a shit load of new dams doesn't come with it's own serious problems. And that's before we get into the major issue that Chinese construction techniques and poor safety records.
Every single bit of industrial development requires creation of pollution. Be it CO2 from burning carbon or extracting large amounts of lithium to build these pieces of shit. And you'll never be able to replace these power systems with solar or wind enough to make this fiction of electric cargo ships be worth the time compared to conventional systems.
Why the fuck would I lock myself into an computing eco-system that keeps forces me to buy over priced crappy hardware and over prices services that I will never want to use to begin with? So towards that, yeah. I don't know exactly what Apple music has it it's catalog and I never will. Because Apple as a company can get fucked and die in a fire.
But beyond that I fucking hated Spotify for the same reason I hate Apple in general. A closed Ecosystem that required me to use an app to listen to music. And I'm not going to use that. Full fucking stop. The artist that I listen to are found from better services like Band Camp, where I don't have to go through some POS third party corporation to access my music constantly through my devices. There's also the issue where that I don't use my own phone like a fucking toy, so I don't waste my battery life on entertainment. So my Phone never gets used for streaming.
As pretty much everyone already knows many people use YouTube to play music in the background while doing various things. But at the same time I don't listen one single mail stream artist out there. Not at all. I listen exclusively to small independent musicians and people that do remixes of other works. Not to mention 'Chillstep' mixes that are great for my anxiety condition. Will there be a place for these people, are we to be subjected to the same old garbage corporate music that infests Spotify? Because I quit that service specially because I got sick and damn tired of the crap from major labels that I never liked to begin with.
Well people are going to have different tastes as well as different views on any one work of fiction, and this basic personal bias' always going to be a thing. But it's also very suspicions when there is such a wild discrepancies between the critic reviews and the fan reviews of any show. Something that has been rife when it comes to Warner Brother's DC comic movies.
Slashdot Mirror
Ahh, [current year]. The year of everyone that doesn't agree with me is a Russian-bot. I can't wait for the next [current year], just to see what kind of pathetic meme idiots like you try to use next.
Hey, have a free gift on your way out the door. A link to a PDF on how to build your own AR-15 lower receiver.
I really think you're overvaluing Google and Amazon. Plus the NRA has been kind of cucked for years, but at least they provide an easy target for idiotic leftist that don't realize other well funded gun rights groups with teams of lawyers do the real legwork of fighting for gun rights in the courts in the courts.
Well that's because the NRA is OBVIOUSLY responsible for EVERY SINGLE shooting that happens. Just like every Cloud Flair is responsible for every act of piracy that happens, Ford is responsible for every car crash, pharmaceutical manufacturers are responsible for every single OD, every single Mullah is responsible for every act of Islamist terror, and every single white male is reasonable for pretty much everything.
It's the [Current Year] and no one has any time for reasonable discussion. Just ban everything and you're a racist for not knowing this already.
They actually want to get rid of the Nazis and are looking for ways to do it effectively.
Yes, because there totally is a real problem with 1930s style socialism loving German nationalist on Twitter. Oh, of course I know that's what you mean. What you mean to say that everyone you don't agree with is Hitler.
Hey, if you're going to go full blown Godwin's law right off the bat that I'm not going to treat you with any respect or credibly. Especially when you're going to start citing every single retarded trope and accusation against other communities and platforms that the left has declared to be 'literally Hitler'. Hell, I don't even like most social media. Twitter, Gab, or Reddit. Some parts of 4Chan are fun, but I don't actually like Nazi memes. They're kind of dumb.
But as a final point I'll also point out that the idea of no-platforming any social out-group has literally zero chance of working in the long run. You'll just drive them underground and build more more social resentment towards to the point you actually end up invigorating these extremest groups. It's just basic human psychology.
And that's exactly the problem right there. Politically driving assholes trying to use their positions of power to suppresses view points they don't like.
After all, a clearly laid out TOS that get's evenly reinforced would solve 90% of your problems. But the moment when you begin to give an unaccoutable secretive group of enforces power over the rest of the platform you will eventually end up with some levels of abuse.
Well, I guess the #MeToo movement stops when the OP can't get any under age nookie.
And trying to poke fun at the 2nd Amendment too while you're at it. Classy.
Speaking of shit-fucks that didn't read the study
What I just said about Drudge isn't even from the abstract. It's from the Online Supplement that came with it. I did in fact read through this tripe, which is why I understood the very serious flaws in it. Specially about how this study laid out a list arbitrary attributes about what constitutes 'junk news'. Many of which are absolutely pointless in terms of the quality of the reporting itself. It should also be noted in the list of websites that the author of this BS declares as 'junk' seem to be entirely right wing.
Beyond that, to think that there are no left wing junk news sites is laughable. By the standards set in this study sites like Slate, Buzzfeed, Raw Story, and the Huffington Post would all be 'junk news'. Yet not a single one of these websites are labeled as junk news in this study. And if you think these sites are not junk news by the standard set in the study then you yourself are beyond partisan.
So you took statements about problematic study methodology and try to deflect away with an example of an isolated example of a nut that bought into some actual fake news.
Well actually there is an example that's somewhat like that. The 2017 shooting in Alexandria, Virginia, of Republican politicians by a far left partisan at a congressional baseball game.
There's so much wrong with this study that it could be a study itself in how bad research is done. The most glaring is that the author of this tripe laid out an arbitrary categories of what the author believes to be what is and is not a legitimate news site. Many of which have little to do with what the information reports actually is, but the style in which it is presented. One of the most glaring examples of which is that The Drudge Reported is considered fake news. Drudge is little more than a basic news aggregator. It's also very questionable that while there is a list of sites that are considered 'junk' it does not say why exactly each site is considered 'junk'.
So I guess the 'Alt-Right' have been around since the 1800s then? Given that Marry Shelly wrong that novel in 1818... in England.
No, don't even bother trying to make up some line in response. You're just a fuckin' idiot that's not worth any more of anyone's time.
Google isn't even trust worthy enough to handle my email without (trying) to monetizing it. So I sure as hell aren't going to give them access to my financial services.
Given that any real economic assessment of the so called wage game has systematically disproven it we're now left with the parts of the EU just using this as an excuse to pass any new regulation they want. That can't possible end in economic catastrophe when people are legally required to hire people passed on their physical gender instead of weather or not they're worth a damn.
Of course. After all far left academia have been rewriting the definitions of everything for years now. Be it the idea of what is racism to the very concept of gender. All while the news media covers for them by writing puff piece after puff piece proclaiming the virtues of these bat-shit and abjectly false notions.
Twitter is little more than a digital version of some a-hole writing something on the wall of a public restroom. Mostly a collection of advertisements and banal BS. It's not like we have someone writing profound tresses on the human condition there.
Hell.. personally I really believe that the entire act of doing this was nothing more than a giant advertising campaign for Twitter using former President Obama's connection to the media.
And why shouldn't we? No one wanted to be tracked. And even more corporatist a-holes like Google have persistently gone out of their way to obscure the end users ability to even know how the system works. Screw them. It's our hardware, and it's our data. If you have a problem with this then Google should release a version of their OS that you can pay and doesn't track us and avoid the situation entirely.
Personally I've just never upgraded beyond Windows 7, as I just don't see any utility for any of the latest updates. Yes, I a am concerned about keeping my security updated. But other than that I just don't care. And of all the people I know that do use 10 I have not yet met a single person that gives a damn about the S version at all. The two people I know that had a device with S eventually got ride of the device entirely thanks to their dislike of the product as a whole.
One of the things that people don't really know about how news is produced is that the large news outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox are just glorified middle men. All they do is collect reporting from local affiliates, the Associated Press, and other more independent journalist to create glorified talk shows where well polished pundits comment open it. It's been that way since the major TV networks began to hand their news gather wings over to the entertainment departments.
Okay now your just flat out lying. And as such I'm not going to response to anything you say beyond this.
ALL solar systems are very much affected by particulate matter in the air, that shit does NOT just 'blow off'. In fact most of them require large amount of water to constantly clean the fucking things. There's also the problem that Solar panels are not eternal. In fact temperature changes in them is why the eventually start to fail. And then you also have the nice problem with disposing of large amount of toxic materials that are used in the construction of the damn things.
Again, everything has a cost. And right wow China is going to use coal, and it's going to keep using coal for generations. In fact they're probably just going to refine their own emissions control systems before they waste resources on building solar technology that will never meet their own rapidly growing energy demand.
And also I guess we're just supposed to forget that China has rampant problems with air quality and particular matter. All of which really fucks with solar power efficient. And you're just not going to ramp up one enough to displace the other.
Of course at all assumes that the Chinese government isn't just lying about their plans and capability to even do this. Something that the government of that nation has systemic problems with doing both historically and today. yeah that whole 'Great Leap Forward' thing is kind of a big deal. Killed a few tens of millions of people, you know. Maybe you should look into it.
I did notice that your graph mentions that only about 4% of that power comes from Wind and only 1.1% comes from solar. The next biggest chuck of it is coming from hydroelectric at 19.7% I guess you think building a shit load of new dams doesn't come with it's own serious problems. And that's before we get into the major issue that Chinese construction techniques and poor safety records.
Every single bit of industrial development requires creation of pollution. Be it CO2 from burning carbon or extracting large amounts of lithium to build these pieces of shit. And you'll never be able to replace these power systems with solar or wind enough to make this fiction of electric cargo ships be worth the time compared to conventional systems.
Because at least check China produces about 80% of it's power generation from burning coal.
http://www.chinafaqs.org/issue/coal-electricity
Remember: never trust some bullshit click bail green washing headline when you can easily check the facts for yourself.
Why the fuck would I lock myself into an computing eco-system that keeps forces me to buy over priced crappy hardware and over prices services that I will never want to use to begin with? So towards that, yeah. I don't know exactly what Apple music has it it's catalog and I never will. Because Apple as a company can get fucked and die in a fire.
But beyond that I fucking hated Spotify for the same reason I hate Apple in general. A closed Ecosystem that required me to use an app to listen to music. And I'm not going to use that. Full fucking stop. The artist that I listen to are found from better services like Band Camp, where I don't have to go through some POS third party corporation to access my music constantly through my devices. There's also the issue where that I don't use my own phone like a fucking toy, so I don't waste my battery life on entertainment. So my Phone never gets used for streaming.
As pretty much everyone already knows many people use YouTube to play music in the background while doing various things. But at the same time I don't listen one single mail stream artist out there. Not at all. I listen exclusively to small independent musicians and people that do remixes of other works. Not to mention 'Chillstep' mixes that are great for my anxiety condition. Will there be a place for these people, are we to be subjected to the same old garbage corporate music that infests Spotify? Because I quit that service specially because I got sick and damn tired of the crap from major labels that I never liked to begin with.
Well people are going to have different tastes as well as different views on any one work of fiction, and this basic personal bias' always going to be a thing. But it's also very suspicions when there is such a wild discrepancies between the critic reviews and the fan reviews of any show. Something that has been rife when it comes to Warner Brother's DC comic movies.