What about the 486 ? I believe NPR ran a story and explained that the 486, though old, is less sensitive to radiation ? Does that sound reasonable ? http://hstsci.gsfc.nasa.gov/host/486computer.html There's also a link on Hughes Electronics that mentions the 486.
Yes! Yes! Now if some emacs-guru would write us an oracle-mode for emacs that will access ora's data dictionary to do tab-completion of schema, table and column names...that'd be TOO COOL!
If Oracle Inc's got any sense, they'd kick in some $$$ to fund it too!
The ONLY decent way to run sql*plus is through emacs. If you use emacs "shell-mode" to run sql*plus, it makes up for the sql*plus' short-commings you mention. Actually makes it kinda nice... Now if somebody would write an emacs mode to interface to the oracle data dictionary so we'd have tab completion of table and column names...that'd be REAL sweet!!!
Slashdot Mirror
What about the 486 ? I believe NPR ran a story and explained that the 486, though old, is less sensitive to radiation ? Does that sound reasonable ? http://hstsci.gsfc.nasa.gov/host/486computer.html There's also a link on Hughes Electronics that mentions the 486.
Yes! Yes! Now if some emacs-guru would write us an oracle-mode for emacs that will access ora's data dictionary to do tab-completion of schema, table and column names...that'd be TOO COOL!
If Oracle Inc's got any sense, they'd kick in some $$$ to fund it too!
The ONLY decent way to run sql*plus is through emacs.
If you use emacs "shell-mode" to run sql*plus, it makes up for the sql*plus' short-commings you mention.
Actually makes it kinda nice...
Now if somebody would write an emacs mode to interface to the oracle data dictionary so we'd have tab completion of table and column names...that'd be REAL sweet!!!