That was one of the things I liked about the movie was the fact that some of the funnier lines were not revealed in the trailer (group hug everybody...you'd have to see it to understand). There is so much to this movie that contributed to the laughter. From the (I assume) stoned engineer to Weaver's repeating of the computer, to a certain line about a shirt in the movie I liked it beginning to end.
Now I know that Mudge has a painting (can't remember who by) hanging around, and I was wondering what artist everyone at L0pht enjoys as well as composers (if any there are into classical music).
Exactly, look at the boxer/briefs question in the CDC interview. I'm sure none of them looked at the question and thought, "That is way to personal...I can't believe they would ask such a thing." Of course then again the Cow Crew isn't the most serious group around to begin with.:)
As I heard it (I haven't seen a mirror site yet), it was a picture of her out of a highschool yearbook that was grabbed from another site ran by a friend of JP's.
I definately agree. Working for a news (I don't report it, I just make sure they can.) organization myself I get to see the process that a story goes through all of the time. If a reporter can only get a hold of a single source then that is what they normally go with. When you have the editor breathing down your neck screaming for your story and threatening your job, you tend to get at least something out the door. If it is wrong, that is what they invented retractions for. I will admit that I would much rather see the story go out right the first time, but the underground scene isn't the easiest to break into. It is harder when you say you are a reporter. It tends to scare people away. The folks over at HackerNewsNetwork and Net-Security.Org are doing a great job working from the inside out and have been doing their best to inform the media as a whole. They are acting as a go between for the media and the people that the media want to talk to. That way the "hacker" doesn't have to reveal themselves directly, but can still get their story out.
While it is true the people over at attrition don't exactly care for CM, it is hard to find anything in their evidence against her to be wrong (I looked into everything that they have posted and haven't found anything yet.). Cult Hero and crew would be severely embarrassed if they had put up false information since that is their greatest complaint against CM & JP. They, unlike the two, are more than happy to change anything that anyone finds wrong with their site and thank the people who help correct them. EK
Slashdot Mirror
"Does Shatner recognize himself (and his toupee) in Tim Allen?" And the loss of a shirt.
That was one of the things I liked about the movie was the fact that some of the funnier lines were not revealed in the trailer (group hug everybody...you'd have to see it to understand). There is so much to this movie that contributed to the laughter. From the (I assume) stoned engineer to Weaver's repeating of the computer, to a certain line about a shirt in the movie I liked it beginning to end.
Now I know that Mudge has a painting (can't remember who by) hanging around, and I was wondering what artist everyone at L0pht enjoys as well as composers (if any there are into classical music).
Exactly, look at the boxer/briefs question in the CDC interview. I'm sure none of them looked at the question and thought, "That is way to personal...I can't believe they would ask such a thing." Of course then again the Cow Crew isn't the most serious group around to begin with. :)
Not only that but he has expressed in one of the weekly mailbags that he simply deletes most email that he doesn't recognize who it is from.
As I heard it (I haven't seen a mirror site yet), it was a picture of her out of a highschool yearbook that was grabbed from another site ran by a friend of JP's.
I definately agree. Working for a news (I don't report it, I just make sure they can.) organization myself I get to see the process that a story goes through all of the time. If a reporter can only get a hold of a single source then that is what they normally go with. When you have the editor breathing down your neck screaming for your story and threatening your job, you tend to get at least something out the door. If it is wrong, that is what they invented retractions for. I will admit that I would much rather see the story go out right the first time, but the underground scene isn't the easiest to break into. It is harder when you say you are a reporter. It tends to scare people away. The folks over at HackerNewsNetwork and Net-Security.Org are doing a great job working from the inside out and have been doing their best to inform the media as a whole. They are acting as a go between for the media and the people that the media want to talk to. That way the "hacker" doesn't have to reveal themselves directly, but can still get their story out.
While it is true the people over at attrition don't exactly care for CM, it is hard to find anything in their evidence against her to be wrong (I looked into everything that they have posted and haven't found anything yet.). Cult Hero and crew would be severely embarrassed if they had put up false information since that is their greatest complaint against CM & JP. They, unlike the two, are more than happy to change anything that anyone finds wrong with their site and thank the people who help correct them. EK