Actually, the outputs of most DVDs players have the macrovision stuff on it, so you can't copy the movie to video tape. The same goes for a lot of the ppv movies you can watch on DSS
Geez, why does no one ever seem to get that for building big web sites where you're going to re-use stuff, the only way to go is to have an approach whereby you decouple presentation logic from business logic? Then you can go ahead and use asp (for microsoft people), jsp (for java people, but face its, its basically the SAME thing), or some other component technology.
There already are high performance CIFS (for that is what Samba uses) file systems out there. If people were to use dedicated optimized boxes (such as Network Appliance's filers) to serve the data rather than using an expensive SUN server that didn't perform as well, you wouldn't have the problem in the first place;-)
But 40 million page views and 2 million page visitors a month is tiny compared to the bases that lycos and yahoo (the only two companies with a profitable advertising driven model) have. I think this IPO is going the way of Salon:(
- Doubleclick does't involve any redirections, and alternate text is still possible if you use iframes/layers. - Communicating to doubleclick what pages you want what ads on is really easy - you get a tool from them to do it - Its much (much!) cheaper to outsource the entire stuff to doubleclick (ok, maybe you want to sell the ads yourself - they let you do that too) than have all the hardware in house.
I agree. Redhat should have given everyone a number of options (something small? 100?), instead offering participating in the offer. Especially because of the current stupid regulations on how options are accounted for in your balance sheet.
Options usually can't be traded for like 120 days though - but this wouldn't be a bad thing (less volatility). And then there would have been none of this E*Trade agreement cr*p.
If no one noticed (and I'm sure you all did, its open), and has a current trading range from 42 to 50 or so, although it seems to be heading lower now.
Actually, why not use something dedicated to file serving like a network appliance filer. Then your sun doesn't get maxed out on its I/O bandwidth and the processor can go do useful things. Oh, and of course, the netapps work with linux since they export their files using NFS.
More than something screwy. You can't use more than 100 threads on IIS 4. It uses Microsoft's Transaction Server thread resource pooling to do thread management, and MTS is internally limited to never handing out more than 100 threads. So basically at least some of it is incorrect.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, the outputs of most DVDs players have the macrovision stuff on it, so you can't copy the movie to video tape. The same goes for a lot of the ppv movies you can watch on DSS
Geez, why does no one ever seem to get that for building big web sites where you're going to re-use stuff, the only way to go is to have an approach whereby you decouple presentation logic from business logic? Then you can go ahead and use asp (for microsoft people), jsp (for java people, but face its, its basically the SAME thing), or some other component technology.
There already are high performance CIFS (for that is what Samba uses) file systems out there. If people were to use dedicated optimized boxes (such as Network Appliance's filers) to serve the data rather than using an expensive SUN server that didn't perform as well, you wouldn't have the problem in the first place ;-)
But 40 million page views and 2 million page visitors a month is tiny compared to the bases that lycos and yahoo (the only two companies with a profitable advertising driven model) have. I think this IPO is going the way of Salon :(
- Doubleclick does't involve any redirections, and alternate text is still possible if you use iframes/layers.
- Communicating to doubleclick what pages you want what ads on is really easy - you get a tool from them to do it
- Its much (much!) cheaper to outsource the entire stuff to doubleclick (ok, maybe you want to sell the ads yourself - they let you do that too) than have all the hardware in house.
I agree. Redhat should have given everyone a number of options (something small? 100?), instead offering participating in the offer. Especially because of the current stupid regulations on how options are accounted for in your balance sheet.
Options usually can't be traded for like 120 days though - but this wouldn't be a bad thing (less volatility). And then there would have been none of this E*Trade agreement cr*p.
Yes, but that means that redhat gets more money for selling their shares.
Unless you think this isn't a good thing?
If no one noticed (and I'm sure you all did, its open), and has a current trading range from 42 to 50 or so, although it seems to be heading lower now.
Because anyone important lives on the west or east coasts. Think about it. New York/North Carolina/Silicon Valley.
Actually, why not use something dedicated to file serving like a network appliance filer. Then your sun doesn't get maxed out on its I/O bandwidth and the processor can go do useful things. Oh, and of course, the netapps work with linux since they export their files using NFS.
Ian Stewart is not a professor of physics. He is a professor of mathematics at Warwick University.
Yes, what a great idea. Introduce a single point of failure to a mission critical system.
More than something screwy. You can't use more than 100 threads on IIS 4. It uses Microsoft's Transaction Server thread resource pooling to do thread management, and MTS is internally limited to never handing out more than 100 threads. So basically at least some of it is incorrect.