I'd put them in the ER. Why all this BS people are posing about photos at the beach or airport security? That isn't what this is about, it's about sicko's taking pictures up your skirt! Why do you think they call it "upskirting"?
In the past, the solution to this was simple. People were selected out of this behavior quite simply - if seen doing it other people would beat them up. Now though it is illegal to do that. So you get these creepers who are emboldened by the fact that nobody is going to slug them - and boom, you need a new law. Honestly a couple of right hooks are what these folks need and they won't do it again.
This behavior has not been possible until the wide spread use of cell phone cameras. I'd give a guy a good beating if he did it to me, he'd have to take a trip to the ER. I've learned the courts are useless when it comes to protecting women against sexual mistreatment.
Stupid, it's not about being comfortable, it's about men violating women's privacy to get their jollies. It's about men sticking a camera up a woman's skirt to take pictures. That's not the woman's fault, that's the man's fault, no matter how short the woman's skirt is.
I'm not saying they need to, but that's it's fun to think of them being shot, videoed, and laughed at as they twitch and die. As for being tagged, guess you could put "sex offender" on the tag on their toe. And not "men", the men who do the upskirting. How many times do you think people would have to post videos of that on YouTube before the upskirting stopped? And it has nothing to do with "moral outrage sensibilities", it has to do with men sexually mistreating women.
In states with "stand your ground" laws, I assume the women could kill them and say they feared for their lives.
Other than that, the courts are worthless when it comes to protecting women from sexual mistreatment.
I'm not advocating this, but it's fun to think about. If women would start shattering these guy's skulls with bullets, and putting pictures of what remains of their heads online, this wold stop.
You are horrible. The guy wouldn't be on trial for being a deviant, but for invading that woman's privacy.
The only rational place you can draw a line is to say: if you don't want it seen, don't hang it out where it can be seen.
That line gets a lot fuzzier if/when people start using infrared/ultrawideband/whatever to see through clothing. I suppose the argument then will be "if you're not encased in lead shielding every time you leave the house, you're pretty much asking for nude photos of yourself to be posted to the Internet".
Granted, that's not a problem yet, but the technology exists. The problem in both cases is that the difference between "what can be seen" and "what people think can be seen" is growing as technology advances. Skirts make an assumption that nobody will have a line-of-sight view from directly beneath you -- an assumption that was never entirely valid, but is a whole lot less valid now that technology has given people access to discreet digital cameras that they can easily position at floor level.
Not saying women should do this, it's just fun to think about.
But if women started killing these guys, and putting videos of their deaths online, things will suddenly stop being "fuzzy".
Want to make it clear:
(Not saying women should do this, or break any law just that it's fun to think about.)
But what do you think of making it legal for a woman to do that? Sort of a sexual stand your ground law?
Want to make it clear:
(Not saying women should do this, or break any law just that it would be cool.)
But what do you think of making it legal for a woman to do that? Sort of a sexual stand your ground law?
their deaths, and post them online. Hearing the woman yell at the pervert, pull out a gun, and as the guy begs for his life, shoot him. He starts to spew blood from both the entry and exist wounds as he coughs up blood. Another bullet smashes into him, and he can no longer stand. We she his head twitching on the ground, he is hardly aware anymore, then we see her foot enter the scene as she kicks his head and it snaps back. Then she laughs as he twitches, bleeds out and dies. How many such videos do you think it would take to end the "upskirting" problem? (Not saying women should do this, or break any law just that it would be cool.)
But what do you think of making it legal for a woman to do that? Sort of a sexual stand your ground law?
I think it would be great if women started killing these men, and putting the videos of their deaths online. I'm betting these perverts would stop the upskirting really quickly! Bam! One hole in the guy's chest as he starts to gurgle up blood. He tries to say something, tries to beg, but another gaping hole created by another bullet knocks him down. We see the woman's foot kick him in the head and hear her laughter and his life ends. Too bad there isn't a hell for people like those guys to burn in. If guys don't want gaping holes in their skulls and chests, they will learn they shouldn't stick a camera up a woman's skirt.
I think it would be really cool if the women would kill these men, and put videos of their deaths up online. Videos of them getting shot or hit by cars, videos of them in pain from gunshots, crying, moaning and begging for their lives. Bet it wouldn't take too many videos like that to get those sickos to figure out they have no business sticking a camera up a woman's skirt, long or short.
What's under your skirt isn't "in public". What if the woman waited for the guy in her car, and then ran over him, backed up, and make sure the wheels were on top of him? How could the woman know he didn't want that? You won't want her to go to jail for a thought crime, would you?
This would be cool. A woman finds a man has done that too her, she gets off the bus, follows him, and videos him as she takes out a gun and lets him know she's going to kill him. As he begs for his life, she shoots him in the chest and laughs as he bleeds out and dies. Then she posts the video online.
Hole in the law? It would be great if the women would put a hole or two in the guy's chests with bullets, the put videos of the guys moaning in pain and dying as the women laugh and kick him. That would end "upskirting" really quickly.
It would be great if the men who did this were shot to death by the women they victimize, and pics of their dead bodies put online. You can bet upskirting would stop really quickly!
The women who are victims should kill these guys, and post videos of their deaths online. They would be begging for their lives as the bullets smashed though their chests. How many videos like that do you think it would take before upskirting stopped?
Slashdot Mirror
I'd put them in the ER. Why all this BS people are posing about photos at the beach or airport security? That isn't what this is about, it's about sicko's taking pictures up your skirt! Why do you think they call it "upskirting"?
In the past, the solution to this was simple. People were selected out of this behavior quite simply - if seen doing it other people would beat them up. Now though it is illegal to do that. So you get these creepers who are emboldened by the fact that nobody is going to slug them - and boom, you need a new law. Honestly a couple of right hooks are what these folks need and they won't do it again.
This behavior has not been possible until the wide spread use of cell phone cameras. I'd give a guy a good beating if he did it to me, he'd have to take a trip to the ER. I've learned the courts are useless when it comes to protecting women against sexual mistreatment.
Wish it would be a felony! Those upskirters deserve at least 5 years in jail. Going to court over a misdemeanor is a waste of time.
Stupid, it's not about being comfortable, it's about men violating women's privacy to get their jollies. It's about men sticking a camera up a woman's skirt to take pictures. That's not the woman's fault, that's the man's fault, no matter how short the woman's skirt is.
I'm not saying they need to, but that's it's fun to think of them being shot, videoed, and laughed at as they twitch and die. As for being tagged, guess you could put "sex offender" on the tag on their toe. And not "men", the men who do the upskirting. How many times do you think people would have to post videos of that on YouTube before the upskirting stopped? And it has nothing to do with "moral outrage sensibilities", it has to do with men sexually mistreating women.
Hence the hurry....
How about the woman you victimize hurrying up and smashing your face in with a baseball bat and putting photo of your beaten mug online?
If your mother were raped, would that deserve a comic sketch?
Yep. Clear enough to get it to stop! And in "stand your ground" states, the woman could always say she thought the phone/camera was a weapon.:)
In states with "stand your ground" laws, I assume the women could kill them and say they feared for their lives. Other than that, the courts are worthless when it comes to protecting women from sexual mistreatment.
I'm not advocating this, but it's fun to think about. If women would start shattering these guy's skulls with bullets, and putting pictures of what remains of their heads online, this wold stop. You are horrible. The guy wouldn't be on trial for being a deviant, but for invading that woman's privacy.
The only rational place you can draw a line is to say: if you don't want it seen, don't hang it out where it can be seen.
That line gets a lot fuzzier if/when people start using infrared/ultrawideband/whatever to see through clothing. I suppose the argument then will be "if you're not encased in lead shielding every time you leave the house, you're pretty much asking for nude photos of yourself to be posted to the Internet".
Granted, that's not a problem yet, but the technology exists. The problem in both cases is that the difference between "what can be seen" and "what people think can be seen" is growing as technology advances. Skirts make an assumption that nobody will have a line-of-sight view from directly beneath you -- an assumption that was never entirely valid, but is a whole lot less valid now that technology has given people access to discreet digital cameras that they can easily position at floor level.
Not saying women should do this, it's just fun to think about. But if women started killing these guys, and putting videos of their deaths online, things will suddenly stop being "fuzzy".
Is that the only "action" you can get you pathetic sack of crap?
Don't want to advocate breaking the law, but it is fun to imagine!
Please understand I'm not advocating this. but it is great to picture it!
It should be clear, I'm not advocating violence or breaking the law in any of my posts. Just saying it's fun to think about
Want to make it clear: (Not saying women should do this, or break any law just that it's fun to think about.) But what do you think of making it legal for a woman to do that? Sort of a sexual stand your ground law?
Want to make it clear: (Not saying women should do this, or break any law just that it would be cool.) But what do you think of making it legal for a woman to do that? Sort of a sexual stand your ground law?
their deaths, and post them online. Hearing the woman yell at the pervert, pull out a gun, and as the guy begs for his life, shoot him. He starts to spew blood from both the entry and exist wounds as he coughs up blood. Another bullet smashes into him, and he can no longer stand. We she his head twitching on the ground, he is hardly aware anymore, then we see her foot enter the scene as she kicks his head and it snaps back. Then she laughs as he twitches, bleeds out and dies. How many such videos do you think it would take to end the "upskirting" problem? (Not saying women should do this, or break any law just that it would be cool.) But what do you think of making it legal for a woman to do that? Sort of a sexual stand your ground law?
I think it would be great if women started killing these men, and putting the videos of their deaths online. I'm betting these perverts would stop the upskirting really quickly! Bam! One hole in the guy's chest as he starts to gurgle up blood. He tries to say something, tries to beg, but another gaping hole created by another bullet knocks him down. We see the woman's foot kick him in the head and hear her laughter and his life ends. Too bad there isn't a hell for people like those guys to burn in. If guys don't want gaping holes in their skulls and chests, they will learn they shouldn't stick a camera up a woman's skirt.
I think it would be really cool if the women would kill these men, and put videos of their deaths up online. Videos of them getting shot or hit by cars, videos of them in pain from gunshots, crying, moaning and begging for their lives. Bet it wouldn't take too many videos like that to get those sickos to figure out they have no business sticking a camera up a woman's skirt, long or short.
What's under your skirt isn't "in public". What if the woman waited for the guy in her car, and then ran over him, backed up, and make sure the wheels were on top of him? How could the woman know he didn't want that? You won't want her to go to jail for a thought crime, would you?
This would be cool. A woman finds a man has done that too her, she gets off the bus, follows him, and videos him as she takes out a gun and lets him know she's going to kill him. As he begs for his life, she shoots him in the chest and laughs as he bleeds out and dies. Then she posts the video online.
Hole in the law? It would be great if the women would put a hole or two in the guy's chests with bullets, the put videos of the guys moaning in pain and dying as the women laugh and kick him. That would end "upskirting" really quickly.
It would be great if the men who did this were shot to death by the women they victimize, and pics of their dead bodies put online. You can bet upskirting would stop really quickly!
The women who are victims should kill these guys, and post videos of their deaths online. They would be begging for their lives as the bullets smashed though their chests. How many videos like that do you think it would take before upskirting stopped?