So why aren't there twenty rovers sending 4k video back from the Moon every day, to millions of willing subscribers on Earth, who would love to see the Moon like that?
Once you've seen one grey lunar hill, you've seen them all.
Assume the device sits in your house behind a NAT router, and you want to access it with your PC at work. How does that work, without zeroconfig, without security, wihout DNS, and without a web server ?
Nobody in their right mind is going to write rover code in assembly. Too much work, and too much chance of a silly mistakes fucking things up, while the actual code saving is not much. It's much easier and cheaper to add some extra memory instead.
A TCP/IP stack is simple, but there's a lot more to networking than just TCP + IP. You also need a web server, security protocols, zeroconfig, DNS, and plenty of other things.
For few bucks you get a chip that offload the TCPIP layer and the whole TLS/SSL protocols and encryption from the processor. That is how the IoT should be done.
Makes no sense. The chip that does the TCP/IP can also do all the other work.
They also conveniently forget about the many women they interact with every day who don't do anything strange.
For casual contacts, such as with bus drivers or cashiers, that's true. However, there's certainly a difference in the way I treat my male and female co-workers. It's not a big deal to call a male co-worker a stupid dick head when he makes a mistake, but I wouldn't dare to say something similar to a woman. Instead, I would try to find carefully worded positive suggestions on how to improve the work. Or just ignore it, and let somebody else deal with it.
Why the hell is it government's business to "allow" people to marry in the first place?
Because at some point in time, the majority of the people thought it was a good idea. Probably because they had first hand experience of what it was like without that.
How about no one has to mine coal or collect bottles to survive? I bet that blows your mind, huh?
Depends on how you plan to implement that. And don't forget logging, and working on oil rigs. Or will we be okay without wood and oil as well as coal ?
I am also unaware of any study that establishes a propensity in gay men to become hairdressers and fashion designers.
Do you really need a formal study for that ? Just walk into a couple of hair salons. It's quite obvious. Also, having been on dozens of plane trips, I yet have to meet a straight male flight attendant.
Slashdot Mirror
So why aren't there twenty rovers sending 4k video back from the Moon every day, to millions of willing subscribers on Earth, who would love to see the Moon like that?
Once you've seen one grey lunar hill, you've seen them all.
It's not clear what exactly the piece of code does. The "instrument" could refer to the ChemCam.
Arduinos can get by with as little as 5 uA in standby:
And how much for the wifi ?
Assume the device sits in your house behind a NAT router, and you want to access it with your PC at work. How does that work, without zeroconfig, without security, wihout DNS, and without a web server ?
Assembler doesn't help you save data memory, which is going to be the biggest part in a simple networked device.
Any ARM can do TCP/IP, and is cheap and tiny. Having two chips talk to each other only makes things more complicated, and in the end, more expensive.
Nobody in their right mind is going to write rover code in assembly. Too much work, and too much chance of a silly mistakes fucking things up, while the actual code saving is not much. It's much easier and cheaper to add some extra memory instead.
A TCP/IP stack is simple, but there's a lot more to networking than just TCP + IP. You also need a web server, security protocols, zeroconfig, DNS, and plenty of other things.
enough address space to make use of that 32MB without contorted bank-switching bullshit
In other words: any kind of ARM CPU, which is fine because they are cheap and easy to use.
3.8K of RAM results in piss-poor networking performance, since it can only hold two full sized network packets.
For few bucks you get a chip that offload the TCPIP layer and the whole TLS/SSL protocols and encryption from the processor. That is how the IoT should be done.
Makes no sense. The chip that does the TCP/IP can also do all the other work.
They also conveniently forget about the many women they interact with every day who don't do anything strange.
For casual contacts, such as with bus drivers or cashiers, that's true. However, there's certainly a difference in the way I treat my male and female co-workers. It's not a big deal to call a male co-worker a stupid dick head when he makes a mistake, but I wouldn't dare to say something similar to a woman. Instead, I would try to find carefully worded positive suggestions on how to improve the work. Or just ignore it, and let somebody else deal with it.
Oh, I see, I thought you wrote 'countries', but you wrote counties. And where you said 50%, you meant 20-40%.
And with modern equipment logging is fairly safe now.
You have a strange definition of 'safe'
http://circanews.com/news/onth...
That's not the point though
The point is that women aren't complaining about equality when men do the majority of dangerous and dirty jobs.
hardly any Stuff that Matters
But we get Matter that Stuffs.
Why the hell is it government's business to "allow" people to marry in the first place?
Because at some point in time, the majority of the people thought it was a good idea. Probably because they had first hand experience of what it was like without that.
The fact is that in many counties 50%of science students at university level are female.
What kind of science ? And where's your evidence ?
How about no one has to mine coal or collect bottles to survive? I bet that blows your mind, huh?
Depends on how you plan to implement that. And don't forget logging, and working on oil rigs. Or will we be okay without wood and oil as well as coal ?
Here's a study that shows gender-related differences starting in neonatal brains:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm...
without the benefit of actual scientific inquiry
http://pss.sagepub.com/content...
I am also unaware of any study that establishes a propensity in gay men to become hairdressers and fashion designers.
Do you really need a formal study for that ? Just walk into a couple of hair salons. It's quite obvious. Also, having been on dozens of plane trips, I yet have to meet a straight male flight attendant.
Feel free to provide some scientific evidence that contradicts the well-established fact that this is a social and not a biological issue.
http://edge.org/conversation/t...
Not superior overall, but some of the differences lead to superiority in certain fields.
That's not terribly interesting. The question you should be asking now is "why".
Because higher levels of testosterone influence the brain to optimize for things that are good for doing science.
Fortunately, we have zillions of studies that indicate it's a social, not a biological, consequence
How do these studies explain why so many gay men go into hairdressing and fashion design ? Because society pushed them ?
There is no "correct" gender. There are different genders, each with their own privileges.
This means it will still take just as long to obtain each image
Not having to send the images to earth saves a lot of time.