I work with embedded devices. These things are limited (small battery, long life, low cost etc). Every clock tick costs power.
State of the art ARM Cortex implementations use less power per clock tick than 10 year old 8 bit stuff, plus they do a lot more per instruction.
Time-to-market is also important, and embedded devices are doing more and more complex tasks, so this means that your average programmer is just going to grab a couple of big libraries, instead of working out all the little details to increase performance.
You can't just grab a handful of lines of code and make it a separate function. A function needs to have a clear purpose, not too many arguments, and preferably not more than 1 return value.
I find the gotos easier to read than the nested set of if statements. Especially because the gotos are a well known idiom for handling this type of error/cleanup.
I think they are mainly talking about people who carry a simple device to count their steps during a normal day. In that situation, it's perfectly normal to be carrying a smart phone, and not worry too much about it getting covered in sweat or getting exposed to shocks.
This would be just another facility that could go boom that we'd have to secure
All you need to do is pipe the alcohol to a central storage facility, and then secure that. People routinely secure storage facilities containing in excess of 100.000 cubic meter of crude oil and derivatives, so this would be fairly easy.
Theres no such thing as an ethernet re-transmit, and switches dont do them
There are possibly retransmits after a collision on a half-duplex connection. But most equipment is full-duplex, so that's not really an issue in typical cases.
TCP retransmits could be used in combination with a buffer. With audio over ethernet, you're going to need some buffering anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
From the table, it looks like the Oracle is the fastest, but also the highest price/tpmC, while the Dell is the cheapest.
You have to be kind to your customers, otherwise they move too much when you rape them.
I work with embedded devices. These things are limited (small battery, long life, low cost etc). Every clock tick costs power.
State of the art ARM Cortex implementations use less power per clock tick than 10 year old 8 bit stuff, plus they do a lot more per instruction.
Time-to-market is also important, and embedded devices are doing more and more complex tasks, so this means that your average programmer is just going to grab a couple of big libraries, instead of working out all the little details to increase performance.
Lot of talk about number of cores, and cache sizes, but what is the actual performance compared to intel's chips ?
No, but neither should the programmer overload the '+' and '*' operator to do all of those things.
But it doesn't work, because you didn't initialize hasResource2 and hasResource3 variables to false.
If AcquireResource1() fails, you have unitialized entries in resources[1] and resources[2].
And this array only works if your resources all look the same.
You can't just grab a handful of lines of code and make it a separate function. A function needs to have a clear purpose, not too many arguments, and preferably not more than 1 return value.
Lots of Internet of Things stuff runs on ARM Cortex M3/M4 on > 100 MHz CPUs. Plenty of resources for lazy development.
That's horrible with the code duplication. It gets even worse if the cleanup is 2 or 3 lines per resource.
I find the gotos easier to read than the nested set of if statements. Especially because the gotos are a well known idiom for handling this type of error/cleanup.
Buying a second ticket on the other hand doesn't add any utility and it's still a bad investment, but for some reason people do it anyway.
It doubles your hope !!
I think they are mainly talking about people who carry a simple device to count their steps during a normal day. In that situation, it's perfectly normal to be carrying a smart phone, and not worry too much about it getting covered in sweat or getting exposed to shocks.
This would be just another facility that could go boom that we'd have to secure
All you need to do is pipe the alcohol to a central storage facility, and then secure that. People routinely secure storage facilities containing in excess of 100.000 cubic meter of crude oil and derivatives, so this would be fairly easy.
I always write my code in tar.gz format, you insensitive clod.
If I had the choice of alcohols
They probably didn't.
Have you seriously thought about this?
Yeah, I figured that somebody could be clever enough to not leave the alcohol out in the open where it can evaporate away.
And what happens if you use 100 square kilometer instead of a square meter ?
mankind has been using yeast & bacteria to make alcohols of various forms since the dawn of time
Not from hydrogen and carbon dioxide, though.
Real navigation keys are called H, J, K, and L.
Theres no such thing as an ethernet re-transmit, and switches dont do them
There are possibly retransmits after a collision on a half-duplex connection. But most equipment is full-duplex, so that's not really an issue in typical cases.
TCP retransmits could be used in combination with a buffer. With audio over ethernet, you're going to need some buffering anyway.
There's no reason a well designed mechanism would ever have to be replaced.
The RJ45 connector is a regrettable standard. They should have put the tab on the socket, instead of on the cable end where it easily snags.
What do you think all the "cooperation across all governance scales" is all about, anyway?
International treaties and agreements, of course.
Any population reduction effort begins with education
History teaches us they usually begin with genocide.