In my opinion Mozilla should just be a browser. If a generic IRC client has to be integrated, it should be done once and for all and in the desktop. What makes a browser more special than a calculator when it comes to chatting?
I am fairly confident that OpenLinux 2.2 has the exact same solution to this problem as Red Hat. It is not a solution specific to any one distribution, it's an option making it possible to specify what kind of libraries are where: the libc5 directory has a =libc5 appended in/etc/ld.so.conf.
Anybody mocking with/etc/ld.so.conf without understanding what he's doing is likely to screw up his system.
As long as you install your libraries in standard places like/usr/lib and/usr/local/lib you don't have to mock with/etc/ld.so.conf.
This is dated March 1, and I remember reading this on Slashdot before.
This article has a lot more than 20 comments as advertised on the front page.
Visit the chat and try to reason with them... they only want to hear about all the lights going out.....
Truth No. 3: With a gun in your hand it's pretty easy to kill someone.
In my opinion Mozilla should just be a browser. If a generic IRC client has to be integrated, it should be done once and for all and in the desktop. What makes a browser more special than a calculator when it comes to chatting?
but not for more than 3 years.
I am fairly confident that OpenLinux 2.2 has the exact same solution to this problem as Red Hat. It is not a solution specific to any one distribution, it's an option making it possible to specify what kind of libraries are where: the libc5 directory has a =libc5 appended in /etc/ld.so.conf.
/etc/ld.so.conf without understanding what he's doing is likely to screw up his system.
/usr/lib and /usr/local/lib you don't have to mock with /etc/ld.so.conf.
Anybody mocking with
As long as you install your libraries in standard places like
And StarOffice is one of those programs that depend on specific symbols.