Your comments aren't "disappearing in the void". Get an account and log in, fool!
As for diff, it's super easy when used in conjunction with sort and uniq (unless you don't grok *nix). You could do al 30,000 with one command. Then again, if they hadn't been using Windows, they wouldn't have been hacked so easily. While the barrier to entry for *nix isn't that high., it does serve to keep the riffraff out.
Let's be honest here, would you believe HRC if she paid an independent consultant to dig through the e-mails and verify/refute them? Probably not. If you are already convinced she is a liar, then you are basically never going to believe her, regardless of any evidence. That's why she hasn't said they are fake, because it doesn't matter to her detractors.
Hey, I don't like Stallman, but if she paid him to compare all the emails, I'd trust him. As for "she hasn't said they are fake, because it doesn't matter to her detractors", sure it does. If she says they're fake and it turns out she's lying, her own supporters will walk. Ditto if she say's they're real, Keep hand-waving - you're as full of shit as the people who support either candidate.
Neither one would be allowed to drive a taxi here. It's part and parcel of the requirements that taxis be less than 5 years old, be clean inside and out, inspected before every shift and a report filled in to confirm that everything is working properly, etc. Nobody wants to get into a dirty cab, and here you'd be hard pressed to find a dirty cab, or an old sh*tbox, etc.
My point is that if they're ready to grab one illegally, they're certainly ready to grab the other. In the eyes of the US administration there is no difference between them.
President Obama can forget his legacy. This is the guy who hasn't closed Gitmo, started the US kill list, aka disposition matrix, failed at real health care reform, made the really stupid decision of giving arms to rebels with the predictable result that it would further destabilize the region.
He's not the only one to blame, of course. Previous governments have almost always been ready to help overthrow any government that is against US business interest, and ignore the human rights records of those with oil.
There is no "accused" in civil courts. It's a civil, not criminal, proceeding. Only defendants in criminal proceedings are referred to as "the accused." In civil cases, there's the plaintiff and the defendant.
And Clinton did commit criminal acts with the emails - but the government, oddly enough, refused to apply the law because "they couldn't show intent" - even though intent isn't necessary to secure a conviction. It's all bullshit.
The United States has a long history of overthrowing democratically elected governments, always over economic interests of American business. Just look at Iran. Or Venezuela. Or look at the list of 57 countries the US has either overthrown or tried to overthrow since WW2. Or the countries which the US meddled in from which we get the term banana republic.
And then there's assassinations and attempted assassinations. Cuba and the Bay of Pigs, anyone? Or Obama's creation of an extra-judicial and illegal hit list.
So no, you're totally, totally full of shit when you say that the US encourages western democracy. "Only when it suits US business." We wouldn't be seeing the problems in the middle east if the democratically elected government hadn't been overthrown. Iran would be secular (as it was before the overthrow), and an anchor of stability. But no, oil oil oil.
It's called professionalism. If you can't be arsed to dress half-way decently, I'm going to be worried that you don't take other things all that seriously either - like safety and maintenance. Besides, why should I have to put up with a driver who hasn't changed his shirt in 4 days and has bad b.o?
The facts that we have indicate that the charge is bogus. The rape charge comes from him not using a condom - not forcible rape. The two women were willing participants, and don't deny it. One of them continued to sleep with him The timing of the accusation is also very suspicious.
How stupid can you be? He only went into hiding after his final appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected. Until then, he wasn't in hiding. After the appeal was rejected, he had 10 days to turn himself in to be extradited.
Austrian media later reported that when the plane landed in Vienna to refuel, US Ambassador to Austria, William Eacho, “claimed with great certainty that Edward Snowden was onboard” and mentioned a “diplomatic note requesting Snowden’s extradition."
The US extradition aspect is hardly bullshit when the US Ambassador to Austria already tried it.
Judging by the complaints, it IS superior to what goes on in the US. So what's your point? That you shouldn't copy a model that works for the customer?
They can be one and the same, you know. It's not like they're mutually exclusive. Besides, the US does it all the time to governments around the world, actively interfering in elections. So stop your hypocritical whining. It's embarrassing.
There are plenty of people in Quebec who only speak French and would put even Trump to shame with the amount of racism and ignorant rhetoric, and political parties that actually support that type of ideology and try to enforce it. In ten years it'll be Nazi Quebec
Ditto for some of the English, and some of every other ethnic group. This is pretty much true everywhere in the world - you can always find a redneck. So what's your point? That taxi drivers in England shouldn't have to know how to speak English because... ?
You need a lingua franca to enable better communications. Canada has 2 of them - English and French.
And for businesses that have more than 50 employees, the law is even more strict. They’re required to use French in everything from internal communications to computer software – and to obtain a certificate from the Office québécois de la langue française, the provincial agency that regulates language, attesting to this “generalized” use of French.
(8) une politique d’embauche, de promotion et de mutation appropriée;
or "an appropriate policy of hiring, promotions, and transfers" - appropriate meaning policies to encourage the business to be able to operate completely in French.
If two people are equally qualified, and one doesn't speak french, the one that does gets hired. Hey, don't blame me - I protested against this law for a couple of weeks, and almost got arrested.
So what if they were stolen? So were the Pentagon Papers., which outed the US's secret and illegal expansion of the Vietnam war into Cambodia and Laos, and the lies the government was using to sell it to the public. Ditto with Edward Snowden's documentation of the US's illegal and massive surveillance of American citizens on American soil.
Whistle-blowers should be rewarded, and in an honest and open government they would be.
Try to keep up. The Swedes already agreed to question him at the embassy. As for what information Assange has, well, that's what the interview is for. To determine if there are reasonable grounds that a criminal offense was committed. That's how these things work.
He was about to be handed over to the Swedes when he jumped bail. The Swedes have since agreed to interview him at the embassy, and that interview was supposed to take place today. Of course, nothing is simple about this case.
Sensible people would damn well have jumped bail rather than certainly being snatched by the US. Gitmo was supposed to be temporary - here it is 10 years later, and it's still not closed. The US has a hard-on for Assange over the 779 Gitmo files that were leaked. The US also has the cooperation of the US media in trying to paint a different picture of what's really going on at Gitmo.
Some dude? WTF. Learn what the RAND Corporation is. It was originally created by Douglas Aircraft to advise the US military. They've been doing so since 1948. They are far from "some dude." Also, the military is using their findings to argue for increased funding for more 4 battalions to offset this imbalance, so they believe it too.
And no, deploying more troops isn't something they would want to do if it weren't required - it takes away funding from the "gee whiz new shiny" stuff.
You seem intent on ignoring the fact that these leaks aren't coming from Russia, but from Wikileaks, who have a pretty good track record of getting it right. And let's face it - now that we know Hillary's "I have one position for the public and another private position when talking to the rich and powerful", whoever copied the docs deserves a public service medal.
How anyone can vote for either candidate is beyond me. The western world is scratching it's collective head wondering WTF happened.
Except that the US has already intercepted an aircraft they thought he was on, and are determined to do the same should he ever attempt to go to Sweden. He would simply never make it there.
The US has no credibility when it comes to this - same as Obama's extra-judicial kill list, which is a violation of international law.
And how is this distraction supposed to be more important than the actual contents of the leaked documents, that show Clinton is a two-faced liar? If the Russians leaked them, they did a public service. Same as if they were to leak Trump's tax returns. Shoot-the-messenger because you don't like the message?
"Presumption of innocence" is ONLY for criminal courts. The "presumption of innocence" doesn't work for someone who's already been caught being deceptive and lying. Let's face it, there's enough stink going around that she has to respond to it, not hide. The onus now is on her, because at this point it's more likely than not (which is the rule for civil trials - preponderance of the evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt) that she's not "innocent" in any sense of the word.
Trump and Clinton are two peas in a pod. They're both power-hungry lying scumbags.
Maybe you should copy our regulations. Taxis are required to be clean, may not be older than 5 years, the drivers must dress appropriately (no t-shirts, Hawaiian shirts, no jeans, etc), pass the exams, pass the physical, pass regular inspections as well as surprise inspections on the road, etc.
They also have to be able to take credit and debit cards.
In short, they have to conduct themselves professionally.
There is most certainly a point for interviewing him at the embassy - it could very well convince the prosecutor that there is no case. Prosecutors drop cases all the time.
And as I pointed out, your "example" is full of shit because they guy who was extradited wasn't in another country's embassy. Give it up, or at least try harder when you want to troll.
Slashdot Mirror
Your comments aren't "disappearing in the void". Get an account and log in, fool!
As for diff, it's super easy when used in conjunction with sort and uniq (unless you don't grok *nix). You could do al 30,000 with one command. Then again, if they hadn't been using Windows, they wouldn't have been hacked so easily. While the barrier to entry for *nix isn't that high., it does serve to keep the riffraff out.
Let's be honest here, would you believe HRC if she paid an independent consultant to dig through the e-mails and verify/refute them? Probably not. If you are already convinced she is a liar, then you are basically never going to believe her, regardless of any evidence. That's why she hasn't said they are fake, because it doesn't matter to her detractors.
Hey, I don't like Stallman, but if she paid him to compare all the emails, I'd trust him. As for "she hasn't said they are fake, because it doesn't matter to her detractors", sure it does. If she says they're fake and it turns out she's lying, her own supporters will walk. Ditto if she say's they're real, Keep hand-waving - you're as full of shit as the people who support either candidate.
They certainly have the ability to release their copies to prove that the leaked docs have been modified. They haven't because the leaks are legit.
Neither one would be allowed to drive a taxi here. It's part and parcel of the requirements that taxis be less than 5 years old, be clean inside and out, inspected before every shift and a report filled in to confirm that everything is working properly, etc. Nobody wants to get into a dirty cab, and here you'd be hard pressed to find a dirty cab, or an old sh*tbox, etc.
My point is that if they're ready to grab one illegally, they're certainly ready to grab the other. In the eyes of the US administration there is no difference between them.
President Obama can forget his legacy. This is the guy who hasn't closed Gitmo, started the US kill list, aka disposition matrix, failed at real health care reform, made the really stupid decision of giving arms to rebels with the predictable result that it would further destabilize the region.
He's not the only one to blame, of course. Previous governments have almost always been ready to help overthrow any government that is against US business interest, and ignore the human rights records of those with oil.
And Clinton did commit criminal acts with the emails - but the government, oddly enough, refused to apply the law because "they couldn't show intent" - even though intent isn't necessary to secure a conviction. It's all bullshit.
The United States has a long history of overthrowing democratically elected governments, always over economic interests of American business. Just look at Iran. Or Venezuela. Or look at the list of 57 countries the US has either overthrown or tried to overthrow since WW2. Or the countries which the US meddled in from which we get the term banana republic.
And then there's assassinations and attempted assassinations. Cuba and the Bay of Pigs, anyone? Or Obama's creation of an extra-judicial and illegal hit list.
So no, you're totally, totally full of shit when you say that the US encourages western democracy. "Only when it suits US business." We wouldn't be seeing the problems in the middle east if the democratically elected government hadn't been overthrown. Iran would be secular (as it was before the overthrow), and an anchor of stability. But no, oil oil oil.
It's called professionalism. If you can't be arsed to dress half-way decently, I'm going to be worried that you don't take other things all that seriously either - like safety and maintenance. Besides, why should I have to put up with a driver who hasn't changed his shirt in 4 days and has bad b.o?
The facts that we have indicate that the charge is bogus. The rape charge comes from him not using a condom - not forcible rape. The two women were willing participants, and don't deny it. One of them continued to sleep with him The timing of the accusation is also very suspicious.
How stupid can you be? He only went into hiding after his final appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected. Until then, he wasn't in hiding. After the appeal was rejected, he had 10 days to turn himself in to be extradited.
The US has already tried to grab him when they thought he was on a flight that landed in Austria.
Austrian media later reported that when the plane landed in Vienna to refuel, US Ambassador to Austria, William Eacho, “claimed with great certainty that Edward Snowden was onboard” and mentioned a “diplomatic note requesting Snowden’s extradition."
The US extradition aspect is hardly bullshit when the US Ambassador to Austria already tried it.
Judging by the complaints, it IS superior to what goes on in the US. So what's your point? That you shouldn't copy a model that works for the customer?
They can be one and the same, you know. It's not like they're mutually exclusive. Besides, the US does it all the time to governments around the world, actively interfering in elections. So stop your hypocritical whining. It's embarrassing.
There are plenty of people in Quebec who only speak French and would put even Trump to shame with the amount of racism and ignorant rhetoric, and political parties that actually support that type of ideology and try to enforce it. In ten years it'll be Nazi Quebec
Ditto for some of the English, and some of every other ethnic group. This is pretty much true everywhere in the world - you can always find a redneck. So what's your point? That taxi drivers in England shouldn't have to know how to speak English because ... ?
You need a lingua franca to enable better communications. Canada has 2 of them - English and French.
All it takes is one complaint. Obviously the people they are dealing with won't complain because they're English. However, the law is clear. Even internal business communications for companies with more than 50 employees must be in French, though they can also be accompanied by a translation. There are 54 companies that have been granted exemptions.
And for businesses that have more than 50 employees, the law is even more strict. They’re required to use French in everything from internal communications to computer software – and to obtain a certificate from the Office québécois de la langue française, the provincial agency that regulates language, attesting to this “generalized” use of French.
Also, see Article 141 subsection 8 of bill 101
(8) une politique d’embauche, de promotion et de mutation appropriée;
or "an appropriate policy of hiring, promotions, and transfers" - appropriate meaning policies to encourage the business to be able to operate completely in French.
If two people are equally qualified, and one doesn't speak french, the one that does gets hired. Hey, don't blame me - I protested against this law for a couple of weeks, and almost got arrested.
So what if they were stolen? So were the Pentagon Papers., which outed the US's secret and illegal expansion of the Vietnam war into Cambodia and Laos, and the lies the government was using to sell it to the public. Ditto with Edward Snowden's documentation of the US's illegal and massive surveillance of American citizens on American soil.
Whistle-blowers should be rewarded, and in an honest and open government they would be.
Try to keep up. The Swedes already agreed to question him at the embassy. As for what information Assange has, well, that's what the interview is for. To determine if there are reasonable grounds that a criminal offense was committed. That's how these things work.
He was about to be handed over to the Swedes when he jumped bail. The Swedes have since agreed to interview him at the embassy, and that interview was supposed to take place today. Of course, nothing is simple about this case.
Sensible people would damn well have jumped bail rather than certainly being snatched by the US. Gitmo was supposed to be temporary - here it is 10 years later, and it's still not closed. The US has a hard-on for Assange over the 779 Gitmo files that were leaked. The US also has the cooperation of the US media in trying to paint a different picture of what's really going on at Gitmo.
Some dude? WTF. Learn what the RAND Corporation is. It was originally created by Douglas Aircraft to advise the US military. They've been doing so since 1948. They are far from "some dude." Also, the military is using their findings to argue for increased funding for more 4 battalions to offset this imbalance, so they believe it too.
And no, deploying more troops isn't something they would want to do if it weren't required - it takes away funding from the "gee whiz new shiny" stuff.
You seem intent on ignoring the fact that these leaks aren't coming from Russia, but from Wikileaks, who have a pretty good track record of getting it right. And let's face it - now that we know Hillary's "I have one position for the public and another private position when talking to the rich and powerful", whoever copied the docs deserves a public service medal.
How anyone can vote for either candidate is beyond me. The western world is scratching it's collective head wondering WTF happened.
Except that the US has already intercepted an aircraft they thought he was on, and are determined to do the same should he ever attempt to go to Sweden. He would simply never make it there.
The US has no credibility when it comes to this - same as Obama's extra-judicial kill list, which is a violation of international law.
And how is this distraction supposed to be more important than the actual contents of the leaked documents, that show Clinton is a two-faced liar? If the Russians leaked them, they did a public service. Same as if they were to leak Trump's tax returns. Shoot-the-messenger because you don't like the message?
"Presumption of innocence" is ONLY for criminal courts. The "presumption of innocence" doesn't work for someone who's already been caught being deceptive and lying. Let's face it, there's enough stink going around that she has to respond to it, not hide. The onus now is on her, because at this point it's more likely than not (which is the rule for civil trials - preponderance of the evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt) that she's not "innocent" in any sense of the word.
Trump and Clinton are two peas in a pod. They're both power-hungry lying scumbags.
Maybe you should copy our regulations. Taxis are required to be clean, may not be older than 5 years, the drivers must dress appropriately (no t-shirts, Hawaiian shirts, no jeans, etc), pass the exams, pass the physical, pass regular inspections as well as surprise inspections on the road, etc.
They also have to be able to take credit and debit cards.
In short, they have to conduct themselves professionally.
There is most certainly a point for interviewing him at the embassy - it could very well convince the prosecutor that there is no case. Prosecutors drop cases all the time.
And as I pointed out, your "example" is full of shit because they guy who was extradited wasn't in another country's embassy. Give it up, or at least try harder when you want to troll.