That's the purpose of interviewing that man - to figure out if he had anything to do with illegal activities or not. Apparently he didn't. So what's the problem?
Not really my obligation to make their fishing expedition easier, though, is it? The problem is that all there's this assumption that when the police (local, state, federal) come asking, there's some responsibility to answer them to demonstrate that your activities are legal. That's not how it's supposed to work.
Every woman I know well enough to tell me whether she has been raped has been raped.
You don't think there's anything at all that seems suspect about that? Nothing?
Every woman you know well has been raped. Really? I find this incredibly difficult to believe unless you (and they) have shifted the goal posts of what constitutes rape so far as to be utterly meaningless.
What I want to know is exactly what they think constitutes sexism, and whether it goes both ways.
It's whatever Genevieve Marie says it is, and no it won't go both ways because as she has already said, misandry isn't real.
She also sees nothing sexist about calling someone who is an asshole a "dick". Insults bashing men or male genitalia are acceptable.
It's hilarious that she pretends nobody knows KittiePie070 is her alt and unironically uses it to kiss her own ass.
Also, Jezebel sucks. No amount of new rules is going to change that, so what is she going to complain about when the masses still aren't praising the Jezebel links?
Slashdot Mirror
That's the purpose of interviewing that man - to figure out if he had anything to do with illegal activities or not. Apparently he didn't. So what's the problem?
Not really my obligation to make their fishing expedition easier, though, is it? The problem is that all there's this assumption that when the police (local, state, federal) come asking, there's some responsibility to answer them to demonstrate that your activities are legal. That's not how it's supposed to work.
Every woman I know well enough to tell me whether she has been raped has been raped.
You don't think there's anything at all that seems suspect about that? Nothing? Every woman you know well has been raped. Really? I find this incredibly difficult to believe unless you (and they) have shifted the goal posts of what constitutes rape so far as to be utterly meaningless.
They won't be happy until everywhere is a safe space.
What I want to know is exactly what they think constitutes sexism, and whether it goes both ways.
It's whatever Genevieve Marie says it is, and no it won't go both ways because as she has already said, misandry isn't real. She also sees nothing sexist about calling someone who is an asshole a "dick". Insults bashing men or male genitalia are acceptable.
It's hilarious that she pretends nobody knows KittiePie070 is her alt and unironically uses it to kiss her own ass. Also, Jezebel sucks. No amount of new rules is going to change that, so what is she going to complain about when the masses still aren't praising the Jezebel links?