As if quals had any bearing on a person's integrity Thornhill actually graduated BSc in physics and electronics, and later MSc in astrophysics at Q Mary College, London. When he entered university, he was devastated by the lack of curiosity and even open hostility to what he considered interesting and valid questions. His own experiments had already convinced him the value of investigating electric effects in the cosmos. I think we have evidence above for the considerable number of closed minds within the academically groomed community.
With regards to Rosetta vs 67P it is fairly obvious that since the phrase 'if it is a snowball' has never been used in the context, we will see every possible effort to PROVE the snowball theory. More closed minds. Did anyone think of asking "Is there ANY ice on this lump of rock?" Did it really form 4.9billion years ago? Or are we wrong? Is this an opportunity to re-think our glorious Standard Model?....Is a million years long enough for these so-called scientists to change their precious assumptions?
Slashdot Mirror
As if quals had any bearing on a person's integrity Thornhill actually graduated BSc in physics and electronics, and later MSc in astrophysics at Q Mary College, London. When he entered university, he was devastated by the lack of curiosity and even open hostility to what he considered interesting and valid questions. His own experiments had already convinced him the value of investigating electric effects in the cosmos. I think we have evidence above for the considerable number of closed minds within the academically groomed community. With regards to Rosetta vs 67P it is fairly obvious that since the phrase 'if it is a snowball' has never been used in the context, we will see every possible effort to PROVE the snowball theory. More closed minds. Did anyone think of asking "Is there ANY ice on this lump of rock?" Did it really form 4.9billion years ago? Or are we wrong? Is this an opportunity to re-think our glorious Standard Model? ....Is a million years long enough for these so-called scientists to change their precious assumptions?