Slashdot Mirror


User: Synoptic

Synoptic's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Developing for XBOX on Developing for the XBox and Gamecube? · · Score: 1

    Can't say much for the game cube, but developing for the xbox is REALLY easy if you know directX. The SDK includes pretty much everything as an interface to directX (directinput, etc), with some minor changes for HW optimization.

  2. Re:Of equal importance.. on Microsoft Verdict Vacated · · Score: 1

    Aren't most of the crimes against other corporation entities? If you are saying that technology would be further along without a Windows monopoly, could we sue corporations for not researching enough or for making stupid decisions?

    -Synoptic

  3. Re:The Story Of Mel on Where Can I Find Beautiful Code? · · Score: 1

    Heh.. makes me think of something I always do, but still get in trouble for with my coworkers.

    Elem *pMyLinkedList;

    Elem **pSrch;

    for (pSrch = &pMyLinkedList; *pSrch;
    pSrch = &((*pSrch)->pNext));
    (*pSrch) = new Elem;

    (management of a link list with double ptrs so you don't have to condition the first element)

  4. Re:Hmm... on Michael Abrash on Games Programming · · Score: 2

    I'm work for MS (Yeah, yeah), in XBOX development. Per-poly detection is a real problem because of the sheer number of operations. We'll probably end up using a lower poly count to do the shadow volumes and the collision (with a higher poly count for the characters themselves). The biggest problem we run into is the memory to store it all- in the latest generation of video cards, it's bad to try to access the polies the video card uses, which means you have to duplicate polies. 64M is a lot, but it's still tough to fit everything in it.

  5. Re:Solid state quantum computing on Stepping to Solid State Quantum Computing · · Score: 1

    Well, couldn't you in theory also use the
    quantum computers to come up with mega-bit
    encryption keys? The whole point of RSA is that
    it's much easier to encrypt than decrypt- when
    processing power means you can decrpypt something, it also means you can encrypt it another order
    of magnitude up..

    (Not very technical, I know, but the point is that
    there could be new forms of encryption also
    based on quantum computers)