Slashdot Mirror


User: dark.nebulae

dark.nebulae's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
83
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 83

  1. It may be fluff but... on Your Java Code Is Mostly Fluff, New Research Finds · · Score: 1

    At least it runs fast on all platforms!

  2. Linux users mass-installing the exploit... on New Multi-Purpose Backdoor Targets Linux Servers · · Score: 1

    It's called systemd. Many users are installing it so now there's a whole slew of linux boxen under someone else's control...

  3. Me too! on GPG Programmer Werner Koch Is Running Out of Money · · Score: 1

    I'm running out of money too, if anyone wants to send some to me that would be great!

    - Bill Gates

  4. I can't wait! on Systemd Getting UEFI Boot Loader · · Score: 3, Funny

    This was the only piece that was missing from systemd.

    I'm sure now all of the growth will end and the community will start rallying around systemd.

    Hmm, is that hell freezing over outside?

  5. Re:Does It Matter? on VirtualBox Development At a Standstill · · Score: 1

    I really need it to have <insert buzzword here> support.

  6. Re:Can they do it with corporate code? on Anonymous No More: Your Coding Style Can Give You Away · · Score: 2

    I've always found that even with style guidelines in place, developers will still leave their fingerprints all over it.

    Some devs will be verbose in their comments, some less. Some devs will embrace IoC where others shun it. Some devs will create a single method with all code in it, some will refactor the heck out of it with many methods. Heck, devs can't even agree sometimes on what should be public, protected, and private (and rarely will style guidelines dictate this kind of thing).

  7. Looks Great! on Latest Windows 10 Preview Build Brings Slew of Enhancements · · Score: 2

    I'll stick with linux, however.

  8. Your problem... on Ask Slashdot: Has the Time Passed For Coding Website from Scratch? · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your problem is you've mixed design with the site HTML.

    Developers are notoriously bad at design work. Being a developer, I can tell you that we are not usually great at the artsy aspects it takes to design good sites.

    However, if you give us a design, we can transform it (using our preferred frameworks) into a working site.

    Somewhere along the way you got the idea that you can do it all, but that's your problem. You can't (and shouldn't) be coding or generating all of the pages. If your expertise is design, then have at it. But after your design is done, hand it over to a developer for implementation.

    Just as I don't want to see a developer designing, I don't want to see a designer developing.