Slashdot Mirror


User: rodgerd

rodgerd's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,219
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,219

  1. Re:turn a 45/55 into a 56/55 on The Free State Project · · Score: 2

    See also: Christian fundamentalists taking over US school boards.

  2. Re:Utopia means nowhere.... on The Free State Project · · Score: 2

    The shorter version: libertarians suffer from the same problems as Marxists. They've even got Rand to substitute for Lenin.

  3. Re:If they're going to do this.... on The Free State Project · · Score: 2

    But if they did it on an island, they'd have to shell out for an army! And a navy! And an air force! Then they'd need an opressive government!

    See, much better to seceede in a mid-west state where you can free-load off the US defence forces.

  4. Re:Absolutely ridiculous on The Free State Project · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's called the Mafia. You can study a little Sicillian history to see this libertarian paradise in action.

    (Actually, the fueding families of any number of the Italian city-states would be just as valid).

  5. Re:Highway funds only persuasive to some states on The Free State Project · · Score: 2

    So? Most of the taxes spent on defense are wasted, to. And landlocked states without millitary installations get a worse deal than coastal ones.

  6. Re:Tough choice. on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    Go away. Read the article.

    Feel like an idiot now?

    The test was available before the company patented the gene sequence. It was being used. The company has done absolutely nothing to advance the medical field - it has claimed ownership of the DNA of a substantial chunk of the population.

  7. Re:Got a letter from my federal rep this weekend.. on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    Sure. After all, Salk, Fleming, and Pastuer were only in it for the mondo dollars.

  8. Re:A fundamentalist by another name... on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    This argument might hold water if it wasn't for the fact the company didn't develop the test, only claimed a patent on the gene sequence.

  9. Re:You can bet... on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    Jesus, is this "national fucking illiterates post to /. day"? First the cretins who didn't read the article and keep claiming the company patented the test, now someone who failed to note the same company holds gene patents on the prostate, but would have, if only they'd read the artcle.

  10. Re:Gene Patent on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    Wrong. RTFA. The patent is on the gene.

  11. Re:Previous Art, Anyone? on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    RTFA. The patent has nothing to do with testing for the cells. The company purports to own the actual genes.

  12. Re:Whew! on British Columbia Bows To Breast Cancer Patent · · Score: 2

    Yeah excpt the company with the patent didn't develop the test. They have a patent on the gene, which they're using to control the test - which existed beforehand. They've done squat to advance medical science.

  13. Re:Lets face facts on Two Reviews of Debian 3.0 · · Score: 2

    *Right now* it doesn't work as well as kickstart. When it does, that'll be great.

  14. Re:The problem with those reviews... on Two Reviews of Debian 3.0 · · Score: 2

    And that's great. When it's delivered, and works with all the packages in the distro it's delivered with.

  15. Re:The problem with those reviews... on Two Reviews of Debian 3.0 · · Score: 2

    The inability to do unattended installs, and the lack of a kickstart equivalent, makes Debian suck on servers, IMO.

  16. Re:Lets face facts on Two Reviews of Debian 3.0 · · Score: 2

    I know people who are professional admins who dislike Debian's install because it makes it hard for them to do their jobs - no unattended install, no kickstart (a la RedHat) is a pain in the arse for a server farm.

  17. Re:Yup on Two Reviews of Debian 3.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, you can. You need, though, to manually install the redhat-release RPM for the appropriate distro (eg 8 if you're coming from 7.3). At that point, running up2date -u will pull down all the packages that upgraded in the distro.

  18. Re:Misleading Summary on Microsoft: No Xbox for You! · · Score: 2

    Actually, they'll just do what the MPAA have done to undermine the free market in DVDs in New Zealand: get thier friends in the US government to threaten New Zealand's trade by claiming we're a company which does not properly respect copyrights.

    (We do, but we freely allow parallel importing - if a free market is good enough for US corporations seeking to fire their American employees and evade US taxes, it must be good enough for consumers looking for a good deal).

  19. Re:KDE/Gnome on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your WM will want to understand it, and your toolkit should understand it. But if you read the paper, you'll see they have solutions to help apps that are unfamiliar with the extension cope with their world changing underneath them.

  20. Re:When they say rotate.... on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 2

    Once the core extension is in there, it should be simple enough to add - the monitor must have some way of telling a Windows host "I have pivoted", so as long as it can be identified and passed to the server as an even, Bob's your uncle. It needn't even be an X addition - a userland daemon could manage it.

  21. Re:when, oh god when on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You'll note if you read some of the correspondence around this that various members of the GNOME team (and presumably KDE) are adding a control-centre gadget to do exactly that.

  22. Re:Just how bad is X? on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    They (essentially) use Display PDF, an evolution of Display PostScript. There is no X server. What they gain from that is, well, a pretty GUI. One that does not have many of the useful features of X (no remote windowing, which matters when you're seling Xserves). More importantly, it has none of the X software, which means people have had to hack a working X server onto the platform - Apple refuse to - and run them there. If all you want are the pretty effects you can get from Display PDF, you can go contribute to one of the projects adding Display PostScript to X. There's not much that uses it, but you can have it.

    Which means Apple may have a Unixish personality of their Mach core, but out of the box, no Unix GUI tools work.

    And if you think Apple, who routinely sue people for producing OS X look-a-like themes would stand for you cloning the Quartz API, you can pass me some of whatever you've got.

  23. Re:What about bits per plane (bpp)? on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not according to Jim Gettys - this is TBD.

  24. Re:Just how bad is X? on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    X is a lot better than many competing efforts. For starters, it works, is in wide distribution, and has a huge suite of apps. Unlike, say, Berlin, or any of the other "Let's replace X" projects (Berlin, to its credit, at least works. Most alternatives are SourceForgeWare with a few Beavis and Buttheads dissing X withou anything to replace it).

    X gives you a base. You can reimplement everything X already does to get the features X doesn't have, or you can implement extensions to X, or rewrite core parts, to correct the faults X has. Guess which is less work?

  25. Re:This is not a rhetorical question. on RandR Support on XFree86 4.3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The rotation is for people with pivoting monitors which can swap between landscape and portait views, I assume.

    Mirroring may be reflection, but it could also be mirrored video for multihead setups.