It's just that "Women have always been the primary victims of war" is a sociopathic, machine-like and deceitful way of fighting for women, pandering to the most extreme amongst women and promoting further extremism.
Indeed - and despite of this, the Left still supported Obama. It's amazing that you can have an entire party that pathologically unaware and problematic.
That's funny, you have literally fabricated inside your own head an alternate reality where people who take the initiative to liken Trump to Hitler or call him a racist simply don't exist. In this parallell pseduo-dimension folded up inside your mind Trump is surrounded by people asking him polite questions.
You must be an engineer to be this good at creating stuff.
The survey goes far in implying that the question is whether Apple should help to unlock THAT SPECIFIC IPHONE. The one used by the terrorists: "As the standoff between the Department of Justice and Apple Inc. continues over an iPhone used by one of the suspects in the San Bernardino terrorist attacks, 51% say Apple should unlock the iPhone to assist the ongoing FBI investigation."
Ironically, it's not even fully clear about this, the question is "In response to court order tied to ongoing FBI investigation of San Bernadino attacks, Apple... should unlock iPhone / Should not unlock iPhone".
But holy shit, if we were talking about the specific iPhone carried by these guys, then it's crazy to argue that Apple shouldn't help to unlock it. If Apple CAN unlock it - as in, if they have a key that makes it possible to unlock it - are you arguing that they should withhold that key from the FBI? Like if someone literally held the key to a lockbox belonging to a mass murdering member of a terrorist organisation, they should not be compelled to give that up or penalized if they don't?
This debate is NOT whether the Apple should assist the FBI in unlocking one specific iPhone. The situation is that Apple has apparently made lockboxes they don't have the keys for, and whether they should be forced to design all future lockboxes with spare keys. I suspect far more would answer yes to the former question than the latter.
If you receive an unwanted cold call, you dial a particular number after it, which isn't processed as a regular call, but flags the number. If the counter goes high enough, things happen.
"Yes, it is possible to file a complaint about harassment anonymously but the form makes clear that isn't likely to get much attention by itself. The form says "This form is anonymous, unless you choose to provide a contact method in the case of something that requires follow up.""
Why lie? That phrasing in absolutely no way "makes clear that isn't likely to get much attention"
It is also not "pretty clear" that "a lot of people" are sexually harassed at conferences.
It's mindboggling that there can even exist a person to make claims like these. You're a great argument for buying guns - when there exists a cult living in the parallell reality you voice here, then it's very unlikely peaceful conversation can ever produce a sensible result.
Slashdot Mirror
So... a horrible person, lower character than a KKK leader, boorish blowhard.
The funny thing is that when left-wingers are called out as sociopathic machine-creatures belonging in a ditch, they cry and call themselves victims.
You basically portray him as a complete sociopath with zero barriers to lie about anything at all.
Sounds in itself like a sociopathic and paranoid accusation.
We all know that Hillary fights for women.
It's just that "Women have always been the primary victims of war" is a sociopathic, machine-like and deceitful way of fighting for women, pandering to the most extreme amongst women and promoting further extremism.
Indeed - and despite of this, the Left still supported Obama. It's amazing that you can have an entire party that pathologically unaware and problematic.
Me, me! I want to be the one who fabricates an entire life story for Bernie Sanders inside a parallell dimension of my head next!
How to... mod presidential candidates as trolls? (score:3)
Cue Slashdotters complaining of what a mean bully Trump is, using personal attacks rather than reasoned criticism.
Trump = Terrorist
Cue Slashdotters complaining of what a mean bully Trump is.
This is the Century of Fear. Everybody promotes fear.
Ironically, this is grossly hyperbolic and in itself promoting fear.
There's plenty of people in the world who do nothing at all to promote fear.
Yeah, no.
The first time I saw PopeRatzo at +5 was when I realized this place had become Partisan Shit and Piss Heaven.
Not to mention that stopping someone from coming into your country is just another variant of imprisoning and murdering them.
Franklin D. Roosevelt didn't just block Japanese from immigrating for a limited time.
He literally built internment camps.
So however much Hitler Trump is, FDR must be five times Hitler.
You must have a funny perspective of WW2, a vision where the American ultra-extreme-Hitler fought the German quite moderate Hitler.
"Such a fascist, racist guy... just like Hitler... and he's a bully!"
Like Obama, who has given the pseudo-fascist Turkish president Erdogan a backrub and a foot massage?
That's funny, you have literally fabricated inside your own head an alternate reality where people who take the initiative to liken Trump to Hitler or call him a racist simply don't exist. In this parallell pseduo-dimension folded up inside your mind Trump is surrounded by people asking him polite questions.
You must be an engineer to be this good at creating stuff.
When left-wingers say of someone "He's a fascist" or "He's like Hitler", they see themselves as simply making a neutral observation.
When left-wingers hear someone say that they're a psychopath or they are evil, they consider that a highly subjective and biased attack on them.
You did single out Trump, and you provided no sources. So....
Sounds like you think ad hominem attacks instead of reasoned debate is NORMAL.
Sounds like you have no trusthworthy sources to refute his arguments.
Sounds like you apparently think arguments are won by the biggest dick, and that the spare time you have to post insults makes you a winner.
Pretty much, sounds like what you say about Trump fits yourself here perfectly. That's irony.
Ah, the good old "Group X is bad" -> "So you say everyone who disagrees with you is bad" sociopathic technique. I see you are well versed in its use.
Bernie is NOT a sociopath, despite his malicious spreading of the wage gap myth?
Hillary is NOT a sociopath, despite her "Women have always been the primary victims of war" pandering?
Yeah, no.
"Trump should stop making subjective and unfounded statements like someone being a loser!"
"Oh, by the way, Trump is objectively and factually a racist"
yeah, no
Clinton enjoyed the benefits of a bubble that blew up under Bush, and a bubble that he helped inflate.
No, it doesn't automatically "give him license" to repeat it to the world - but in this case it did.
The survey goes far in implying that the question is whether Apple should help to unlock THAT SPECIFIC IPHONE. The one used by the terrorists: "As the standoff between the Department of Justice and Apple Inc. continues over an iPhone used by one of the suspects in the San Bernardino terrorist attacks, 51% say Apple should unlock the iPhone to assist the ongoing FBI investigation."
Ironically, it's not even fully clear about this, the question is "In response to court order tied to ongoing FBI investigation of San Bernadino attacks, Apple... should unlock iPhone / Should not unlock iPhone".
But holy shit, if we were talking about the specific iPhone carried by these guys, then it's crazy to argue that Apple shouldn't help to unlock it. If Apple CAN unlock it - as in, if they have a key that makes it possible to unlock it - are you arguing that they should withhold that key from the FBI? Like if someone literally held the key to a lockbox belonging to a mass murdering member of a terrorist organisation, they should not be compelled to give that up or penalized if they don't?
This debate is NOT whether the Apple should assist the FBI in unlocking one specific iPhone. The situation is that Apple has apparently made lockboxes they don't have the keys for, and whether they should be forced to design all future lockboxes with spare keys. I suspect far more would answer yes to the former question than the latter.
Closing your account stops them from tweeting at you. But they are still out there.
If you receive an unwanted cold call, you dial a particular number after it, which isn't processed as a regular call, but flags the number. If the counter goes high enough, things happen.
"Yes, it is possible to file a complaint about harassment anonymously but the form makes clear that isn't likely to get much attention by itself. The form says "This form is anonymous, unless you choose to provide a contact method in the case of something that requires follow up.""
Why lie? That phrasing in absolutely no way "makes clear that isn't likely to get much attention"
It is also not "pretty clear" that "a lot of people" are sexually harassed at conferences.
It's mindboggling that there can even exist a person to make claims like these. You're a great argument for buying guns - when there exists a cult living in the parallell reality you voice here, then it's very unlikely peaceful conversation can ever produce a sensible result.