Slashdot Mirror


User: John+Hasler

John+Hasler's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,663
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,663

  1. Re:No way on Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I run firewalls and I have virus scanners, but if you haven't been infected with a virus before then you haven't been on the internet long enough.

    I've been on the Internet for about 25 years. No computer under my administration has ever been infected by malware of any sort.

    Why do I get punished for what other people do?

    You aren't being punished. The Net is being protected.

    Should car manufacturers be able to remotely turn off your car when your car starts to leak oil or freon?

    Bad analogy. The manufacturer is not shutting off your car. The toll-road operator is telling you to leave and not come back until you fix your oil leak.

  2. Re:The ISP should work with the customer... on Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? · · Score: 1

    > The customer is probably not the villian here...

    No, but he's the fool, cheapskate, and/or lazy sod. He could have hired someone to help him.

  3. Re:I don't know for you... on Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? · · Score: 1

    What about a ISP level antivirus/malware detection mechanism.

    That's called "deep packet inspection". Expect to be able to reach only Disney, ESPN, and Fox. No P2P, of course. Maybe Blizzard, if they pay enough.

    If I pay for my bandwidth and I got cut-off because of malware, I expect a full refund for the loss of service plus compensation for the trouble.

    Sue the infested site where you clicked to see the cute puppy and got infected. Don't make the rest of us suffer for your incompetence.

  4. Re:Cut off vs. filtered on Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...ISPs should have firewalls / filters they control further upstream, where they can add rules to block certain types of traffic only when necessary.

    So much for "network neutrality".

    Anyway, I don't like the idea of being cut off from network access without at least a few weeks' advance notice and time to respond.

    It's easy to avoid getting infected.

  5. Re:No Way! on Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That door has always been wide open.

  6. Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? on Should ISPs Cut Off Bot-infected Users? · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  7. Re:Dosnt Support Google Chrome on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    > Other search engines are available.

    Bing?

  8. Re:Why not just not have a Google account? on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    Google is an advertising agency. I see no ads.

  9. Re:Suddenly, it doesn't feel like '1984' anymore! on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    > I don't believe anything could go wrong at all.

    Advertisiers, who are the only ones Google cares about, can tolerate quite a bit of inaccuracy in their targeting. All that they are going to do with "fingerprinting" is cluster searches together as probably having come from the same person. Being wrong 10% of the time is no great loss to them. To me "targeted" ads are of no consequence at all as I see no ads anyway

  10. Re:Suddenly, it doesn't feel like '1984' anymore! on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    "Bam" what?

  11. Re:Why not just not have a Google account? on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    That would be a silly waste of their resources.

  12. Re:Why not just not have a Google account? on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    > I imagine you're still tracked by your IP address...

    Dynamic. They might be able to tie clusters of my searches together that way. So what?

    > ...by cookies...

    No cookies, no scripts.

    > ...and/or any other methods I don't know about.

    Which would be just as likely to work through this thing. Browser fingerprinting would be one such. It would let them tie all of my searches together. So what?

  13. Why not just not have a Google account? on GoogleSharing, Now With No Trust Required · · Score: 1

    Google search and news work fine without one.

  14. Re:So... what? on Privacy Option Proposed To Control Behavioral Ads · · Score: 1

    I don't actually much care about their "data mining". I just don't want to see their asinine ads. And I don't. They don't get much data either, but that's really a side-effect.

  15. "easy-to-use opt-out option" on Privacy Option Proposed To Control Behavioral Ads · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've already got one of those. It's called Privoxy.

  16. Re:Palindrome on The Binary Code In Canada's Gov-Gen Coat of Arms · · Score: 1

    > I noticed that too, from reading the summary.

    Yes, but it's a Slashdot summary so there is no reason to believe it is true without verifying it.

  17. Re:Palindrome on The Binary Code In Canada's Gov-Gen Coat of Arms · · Score: 1

    Honestly, if I had only 33 bits to encode something I'd use a compact encoding to fit the most meaning in it.

    Which would consist of writing "This number stands for the entire Library of Congress" on the corner of your blotter.

  18. Re:Can get even worse on The Binary Code In Canada's Gov-Gen Coat of Arms · · Score: 1

    Yes, but they only have two of them.

  19. Re:I still can't believe on The Binary Code In Canada's Gov-Gen Coat of Arms · · Score: 1

    > ...we pledge allegiance to a foreign head of state.

    She's your Queen. She just happens to also be queen of a number of other nations.

  20. Re:The bigger question is: on Bittorrent To Replace Standard Downloads? · · Score: 1

    Looks like a good reason to stay away from VMWare.

  21. "Illegal media"? on Anti-Piracy Lawyers Caught Pirating Each Other · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the hell is that? And how do you download any sort of media?

  22. Re:Just because 50 billion flies think.... on The Science of Truthiness · · Score: 1

    It does, if you are a fly. Of course different kinds of flies like different kinds of shit, and so we have political parties.

  23. Re:No Market on The Science of Truthiness · · Score: 1

    > Nobody wants to listen to reason...

    Don't worry. There will be no actual reason involved. This will just be another source of "truthiness".

  24. Re:Truthy on The Science of Truthiness · · Score: 1

    It isn't serious.

  25. Re: uncover deceptive tactics and misinformation.. on The Science of Truthiness · · Score: 1

    I've been observing politicians for half a century. I was even actively involved in politics for a decade or so.