Good troll there... but perhaps you're missing the rather obvious fact that NSA SELinux is in fact more secure than Windows 2000, and they worked on it because they could? Unless you show me how windows 2000 can support flexable manditory access controls with a fairly easy to define policy, with proper seperation of policy and enforcement...
Of course, I've also been told that NSA has internally been told not to use Linux at all, but that this isn't strictly followed; many groups try to find reasons they should be allowed to use it, because its what they prefer.
Slashdot Mirror
Of course, I've also been told that NSA has internally been told not to use Linux at all, but that this isn't strictly followed; many groups try to find reasons they should be allowed to use it, because its what they prefer.