It showed that they were many issues that weren't solved yet, even getting the medical support to do the thing was still not sure.
Anyway this whole article sounds *vapourous*, like if they were seeking for investor without having the technology behind it ready yet. The powering and switch off issue looks contradictory.
Big Brother doesn't care about you, why should he ?
I would have been pleased to see what he could have done if he had staid with Borland. I used to like Delphi/CppBuilder as a student, doing quick and not so dirty apps.
He could make writing apps for windows atractive again.
I think the experience was submitted 3-4 years ago by an obscure russian scientist. But we all know how the scientific community isn't eager to aknowledge experience that would contradict the current theories they pretend to be "laws".
To me it looks like when you have an artifact rotating fast enough, the matrix just can't simulate consistents gravity values anymore.
Don't you think it would have great advantages? After all it's our money!
All Eavedropping softwares in the world would benefit from it. Some parts would serve for OCR / Voice recognition systems / Encryption cracking. And citizen's privacy will suffer some more.
But do we need privacy ? We could even build an distributed spying agency to spy our governments. Like this no one has privacy and anyone can spy everyone.
No more secrets, no more lies... NO MORE LIES RATM song following
You didn't prove to know anything about french laws, there are laws agains foreign bribery. You're certainly an expert at french diplomacy, but I don't think french dipomacy differs much from others: promote french interrests and values (sometime even values before interrests). Our public services may not be very efficient, but at least that means we're not a dictature. Even if your assertions were true or funded, that still doesn't say anything about Echelon. Yes it's a great piece of technology but the purpose is not so great, and come on... it's closed source! You can't even buy it!
Most of the time, americans are OK, but when it comes to politics... Why do you flame any contry taking actions about some silly gov agency of yours ?
First, it's not France, it's some attorney, as justice is independant there. What is pointed there isn't industrial spying, it's the lack of concern for citizen's privacy, WTH don't you get it clear !
And the ease to get informations justifying ECHELON, something whose existence has been covered up for so long, should warn you.
About french laws about privacy check out http://www.cnil.fr/
and so the AIs won't send the grich to kill us all in Hyperion in 10 centuries ?
You should read some more optimistic Sci-Fi.
Man can still evolve, we're not bound to our evil habits. There is very few chances for Mars to host any form of life, so there's nothing we can destroy!
does it apply outside of USA ?
on
Faster
·
· Score: 1
One thing that used to annoy me was, when a american friend of mine told me he liked Paris because it was so relaxed. And for many of us, french (who can't spell correct english) it is the most stressed place in France.
Since, I have traveled a bit, and it seems time does not flow at the same speed in different places. On the internet it goes an other way. Time goes much faster there. So when you switch from places to places you seem out of synch with the locals, except those who spend much of their time online.
Considering Artists get paid for having their song at the radio and/or TV, we could propose a model that would allow free music (as in freedom to listen anything I want) and artist retribution:
As I already posted there, I think it would be more efficient to consider diffusing songs on file on the internet be more like broacasting threw the air, like in radio and TV.
As their is "State" radio in some states wich have an annual fee, in this model it will be on a voluntary basis, an monthly fee(about the cost of a CD). Each artist would be given a percentage of the fee of the consummer based on the logs of his player wich would be sent (in a protocol yet to be defined) to the server for processing.
I'm sure some jurist may find a breach so that we could consider the internet as a media like radio or television that would allow to diffuse music, and so make this scheme of diffusion possible.
As I already posted there, I think it would be more efficient to consider diffusing songs on file on the internet be more like broacasting threw the air, like in radio and TV.
As their is "State" radio in some states wich have an annual fee, in this model it will be on a voluntary basis, an monthly fee(about the cost of a CD). Each artist would be given a percentage of the fee of the consummer based on the logs of his player wich would be sent (in a protocol yet to be defined) to the server for processing.
I'm sure some jurist may find a breach so that we could consider the internet as a media like radio or television that would allow to diffuse music, and so make this scheme of diffusion possible.
I really think I've seen this story many times before. How can zealots still believe in it.
From all the cool stuff that made the Amiga success in the late 80s, what remains? Why not tryings to add cool hardware and software to architecture much more widespread now.
Because you where right once, it doesn't mean you're still right now. Amiga didn't adapt.
When I'm thinking to Amiga, all I have is a bunch of good old souvenirs and some regrets for the stupid marketing choices that have been made.But now rest in peace Amiga.
I'm glad i'm not the first non-zealot to post this, and that you get moderated up.
I think a cool browser for linux should be in the Gnome equivalent of ActiveX: Bonobo. Support as Well as IE5 does W3C standarts and have some of these cool features. I kmow I does more http at work that at home, but I'm sad that it's faster at work, (and not to a bandwith problem).
Re:Why GNU is Unix (though of course it's not...)
on
The End of Unix?
·
· Score: 1
As a child, Spielberg was my favorite director. But now that I'm (23) old, I really think his film only show one point of view, and are much oriented to this point of view. In Kubrick's film camera adopt's many POV, in Spielberg's, only one, (except a little moment in Shindler's List).
I suspect he won't be able to do what Kubrick had in mind, even if he also tries to understand it during the next 18 years. The result might be a good Spielberg but far from the one Kubrick should have directed. I really think, by respect for Kubrick's memory, Spielberg should not turn this movie.
I really think it would better to classify on time you really spend listening rather than apreciation. This would have to be done by the mp3 player (otherwise it would suck). The prb is portable players. Those would need "hand written" declaration and filling form sucks...
I really think this is feasable, butin many cases copyrights are owned by the editor, mot the artist. So that's prb 2.
Slashdot Mirror
Indeed it's just the documentation of the proprietary extensions, the detailed informations of what Microsoft added to the Kerberos open protocol.
Without this documentation, there can't be compatiblity on other's platforms.
Free comes from frei like in:
Arbeit macht frei
It looks like I missed some importants discoveries in physics.
for once they where other posts indexed
.sig this time :p
--
No
The technology has already been used for 7 of 9.
Well I won't object being assimilated by her.
You abandonned all right when you buy products or when you sold yourself to your employer. Katz made me post this
I remember this cover from wired a few month ago
It showed that they were many issues that weren't solved yet, even getting the medical support to do the thing was still not sure.
Anyway this whole article sounds *vapourous*, like if they were seeking for investor without having the technology behind it ready yet. The powering and switch off issue looks contradictory.
Big Brother doesn't care about you, why should he ?
I would have been pleased to see what he could have done if he had staid with Borland. I used to like Delphi/CppBuilder as a student, doing quick and not so dirty apps.
He could make writing apps for windows atractive again.
I think the experience was submitted 3-4 years ago by an obscure russian scientist. But we all know how the scientific community isn't eager to aknowledge experience that would contradict the current theories they pretend to be "laws".
To me it looks like when you have an artifact rotating fast enough, the matrix just can't simulate consistents gravity values anymore.
How work democraty:
Attorney's don't vote laws, it's the parliement.
That said, encryption has been legal here since french gov is aware if Echelon.
Jean.
Don't you think it would have great advantages? After all it's our money!
All Eavedropping softwares in the world would benefit from it. Some parts would serve for OCR / Voice recognition systems / Encryption cracking. And citizen's privacy will suffer some more.
But do we need privacy ? We could even build an distributed spying agency to spy our governments. Like this no one has privacy and anyone can spy everyone.
No more secrets, no more lies... NO MORE LIES
RATM song following
You didn't prove to know anything about french laws, there are laws agains foreign bribery. You're certainly an expert at french diplomacy, but I don't think french dipomacy differs much from others: promote french interrests and values (sometime even values before interrests). Our public services may not be very efficient, but at least that means we're not a dictature. Even if your assertions were true or funded, that still doesn't say anything about Echelon. Yes it's a great piece of technology but the purpose is not so great, and come on... it's closed source! You can't even buy it!
Most of the time, americans are OK, but when it comes to politics... Why do you flame any contry taking actions about some silly gov agency of yours ?
First, it's not France, it's some attorney, as justice is independant there. What is pointed there isn't industrial spying, it's the lack of concern for citizen's privacy, WTH don't you get it clear !
And the ease to get informations justifying ECHELON, something whose existence has been covered up for so long, should warn you.
About french laws about privacy check out
http://www.cnil.fr/
and so the AIs won't send the grich to kill us all in Hyperion in 10 centuries ?
You should read some more optimistic Sci-Fi.
Man can still evolve, we're not bound to our evil habits. There is very few chances for Mars to host any form of life, so there's nothing we can destroy!
One thing that used to annoy me was, when a american friend of mine told me he liked Paris because it was so relaxed. And for many of us, french (who can't spell correct english) it is the most stressed place in France.
Since, I have traveled a bit, and it seems time does not flow at the same speed in different places. On the internet it goes an other way. Time goes much faster there. So when you switch from places to places you seem out of synch with the locals, except those who spend much of their time online.
Yeah sure, that's why their where so many of them aplauding businessmen and technocrats at Seatle for WTC last round ?
As I already posted there, I think it would be more efficient to consider diffusing songs on file on the internet be more like broacasting threw the air, like in radio and TV.
As their is "State" radio in some states wich have an annual fee, in this model it will be on a voluntary basis, an monthly fee(about the cost of a CD). Each artist would be given a percentage of the fee of the consummer based on the logs of his player wich would be sent (in a protocol yet to be defined) to the server for processing.
I'm sure some jurist may find a breach so that we could consider the internet as a media like radio or television that would allow to diffuse music, and so make this scheme of diffusion possible.
As I already posted there, I think it would be more efficient to consider diffusing songs on file on the internet be more like broacasting threw the air, like in radio and TV.
As their is "State" radio in some states wich have an annual fee, in this model it will be on a voluntary basis, an monthly fee(about the cost of a CD). Each artist would be given a percentage of the fee of the consummer based on the logs of his player wich would be sent (in a protocol yet to be defined) to the server for processing.
I'm sure some jurist may find a breach so that we could consider the internet as a media like radio or television that would allow to diffuse music, and so make this scheme of diffusion possible.
I really think I've seen this story many times before. How can zealots still believe in it.
From all the cool stuff that made the Amiga success in the late 80s, what remains? Why not tryings to add cool hardware and software to architecture much more widespread now.
Because you where right once, it doesn't mean you're still right now. Amiga didn't adapt.
When I'm thinking to Amiga, all I have is a bunch of good old souvenirs and some regrets for the stupid marketing choices that have been made.But now rest in peace Amiga.
Koz i didn't want to start a Gnome / KDE flame war
I'm glad i'm not the first non-zealot to post this, and that you get moderated up.
I think a cool browser for linux should be in the Gnome equivalent of ActiveX: Bonobo. Support as Well as IE5 does W3C standarts and have some of these cool features. I kmow I does more http at work that at home, but I'm sad that it's faster at work, (and not to a bandwith problem).
Hum, GNU and Linux are not guys.
As a child, Spielberg was my favorite director.
But now that I'm (23) old, I really think his film only show one point of view, and are much oriented to this point of view. In Kubrick's film camera adopt's many POV, in Spielberg's, only one, (except a little moment in Shindler's List).
I suspect he won't be able to do what Kubrick had in mind, even if he also tries to understand it during the next 18 years. The result might be a good Spielberg but far from the one Kubrick should have directed. I really think, by respect for Kubrick's memory, Spielberg should not turn this movie.
Seriously...
Let's do it, it is feasable, doesn't exist yet, and I think it is 'good'.
I really think it would better to classify on time you really spend listening rather than apreciation. This would have to be done by the mp3 player (otherwise it would suck). The prb is portable players. Those would need "hand written" declaration and filling form sucks...
I really think this is feasable, butin many cases copyrights are owned by the editor, mot the artist. So that's prb 2.