>Honestly no-fault divorce should have never been a thing, and society should look down on adultery. Its really better for all of us. We need more shame and more >shaming not less. If you don't want to commit don't get married its that simple.
I was in agreement until this. No fault divorce is by far the best thing to happen to divorce law. The fact that people can get divorced is good for many reasons, and the division of property without a long drawn out process takes a lot of load off the legal system. If you marry while drunk, vegas style, or while young and stupid, have no kids, no real property issues, no reason for divorce other than you married the wrong person at the wrong time, then please, by all means, file the papers, pay the fee, and wait the 90 days, and dissolve the marriage.
If there are kids, if there is fault, and I mean a lot of fault, not just some mildly capricious actions, but fraud or violence, then yes, there should be an at fault, or penalty for that kind of marriage dissolution. The games people play with the Private Investigators, the hidden microphones, the pages of phone calls and texts, all to get an extra 15% is ridiculous, because in most cases, a divorce with fault will only sway the distribution of property by 15 - 20 % at most.
Slashdot Mirror
>Honestly no-fault divorce should have never been a thing, and society should look down on adultery. Its really better for all of us. We need more shame and more >shaming not less. If you don't want to commit don't get married its that simple. I was in agreement until this. No fault divorce is by far the best thing to happen to divorce law. The fact that people can get divorced is good for many reasons, and the division of property without a long drawn out process takes a lot of load off the legal system. If you marry while drunk, vegas style, or while young and stupid, have no kids, no real property issues, no reason for divorce other than you married the wrong person at the wrong time, then please, by all means, file the papers, pay the fee, and wait the 90 days, and dissolve the marriage. If there are kids, if there is fault, and I mean a lot of fault, not just some mildly capricious actions, but fraud or violence, then yes, there should be an at fault, or penalty for that kind of marriage dissolution. The games people play with the Private Investigators, the hidden microphones, the pages of phone calls and texts, all to get an extra 15% is ridiculous, because in most cases, a divorce with fault will only sway the distribution of property by 15 - 20 % at most.